Israeli Atrocities = Mischief on Earth

The HolyLand...Palestine too

The history of Israelites and the Holy Land has never been an easy one. It has been tumultuous, what with the ever so rebellious and defiant nature of the Israelites brought wratchs and punishments upon them. Today, even with the illegal state of Israel's mass-fillers, the caucasian jews, not much have changed. The jewish nation is still committing falsehood, persecution on Palestinians and Muslims and plots to create mischief unto the world.

A long time ago, the Prophet Moses (A.S) liberated the Israelites from the clutches of the Pharaoh and Egypt. They were saved by God and taken to a land which was promised to them but despite the divine instruction to enter and take the land for themselves, they refused to fight the occupants and stated that they will only enter when the occupants leave. For this act of defiance, Allah punished the Israelites to wander the deserts for the next 40 years in bewilderment.

In the Quran,it has been stated that the Holy Land was given to the Israelites. There was no doubt that God chose them and gifted so much on them, but the Israelites have proven themselves to be rebellious. The Prophet Solomon prayed and was granted a kingdom so great and wealthy, which became the pinnacle of the Israelites' greatness on earth. However, long after Solomon, the kingdom of Israel split apart and rifts become apparent, and as usual, the Israelites went astray. In short, the Israelites kept violating the divine terms and conditions that was set upon them in receiving the Holy Land.

“And remember it was said to them ‘Dwell in this town (i.e., Jerusalem) and eat therein as ye wish but say the word of humility and enter the gate in a posture of humility’...”
(Qur’an, al-‘Araf, 7:161)

Despite warnings from prophets such as Jeremiah, the Israelites committed so many sins, among them, altering the Torah whereby making it permissible to lend money with interest to non-jews and yet charging interest among jews remain prohibited, as seen here:

“Thou shalt not lend on interest to thy brother (Jew); whether it be lending money on interest, or lending commodities on interest (because commodities were sometimes used as money) or lending on interest anything which is lent on interest"
Unto a stranger (i.e., one who is not a Jew) you may lend on interest…”
(Deuteronomy , 23:19-20)

To this, in 587 BCE, the Israelites were punished when a Babylonian army led by Nebuchadnezzar laid siege to Jerusalem, burned the city, murdered its inhabitants, destroyed the Temple of Solomon, and carried the cream of the Jewish population into slavery in Babylon. The Prophet Jeremiah had warned them that this would happen (Jeremiah: 32:36), exactly as Allah had declared in the Qur’an that He never destroys a people before sending a warning to them  (Qur’an, Banu Israil, 17:15-16).

Allah is Merciful and Forgiving, and the advent of Dhul-Qarnayn saw the Babylonian kingdom conquered without a single shed of blood almost 70 years later. The Israelites were allowed to return home and again, the Holy Land gained prominence, and yet again, the Israelites went astray. Their refusal to follow the Prophets chosen by God and their love to make profits in ill gotten ways became a trademark for them. They murdered the Prophets Zakaria (A.S) in a holy place, and Yahya (John) by deceit. According to the Bible, even Jesus did not mince his words in condemning these murders:

“This is why the wisdom of God said: I will send them Prophets and Messengers. Some they will kill and some they will persecute. It was that the blood of all the Prophets shed from the foundation of the world might be charged upon this generation (of Jews), from the blood of Abel down to the blood of Zakariah, who was slain between the altar and the House of God - yes, I tell you, it will all be charged upon this generation….”
(Luke, 11:49-51)

Finally the Israelites boasted of how they killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary (but Allah, the All-Powerful, saved him from death):
“That they said (in boast): We killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah; but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.”
(Qur’an, al-Nisa, 4:157)

After the so-called killing of Jesus and their boast, the Israelites were punished again. A Roman army led by General Titus besieged Jerusalem in 70CE. Titus destroyed the city of Jerusalem, murdered the inhabitants and expelled the remnant of Jews from the Holy Land. The temple was again destroyed and the Roman soldiers tore it apart, stone by stone, in search of melted gold, exactly as Jesus (‘alaihi al-Salaam) had warned and prophesied "not one stone will be left upon another; all will be thrown down."
(See Qur’an, Banu Israil, 17:4-7)

</

div> “And there is a ban on (the people of) a town which We destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim their town) (Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95)

Islamic scholars believe that Jerusalem is the name of the town referred to in the Surah above, and the Israelites were not allowed to return there for quite some time.

The Quran made it clear on the punishment upon the Israelites, and the terror brought down by God:

“And We gave (clear) warning to the Children of Israel in the Book that twice would they commit Fasad on ‘the land’ and be elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!”

“When the first of the warnings came to pass, We sent against you Our servants capable of terrible warfare.” “They entered the very inmost parts of your homes; and it was a warning (completely) fulfilled.”

“And after a time We allowed you to prevail against them once again, and aided you with wealth and offspring, and made you more numerous (than ever).” “(And We said) “If you persevere in doing good you will but be doing good to yourselves; and if you do evil it will be done to yourselves.” And so when the prediction of the second (period of iniquity) came true, (We raised new enemies against you and allowed them) to disgrace you utterly, and to enter the Temple as (their forerunners) had entered it once before, and to destroy with utter destruction all that they had conquered.”
(Qur’an, Banu Israil, 17:4-7)

“….soon shall I show you the homes of the wicked (how they lie desolate).”
(Qur’an, al-‘Araf, 7:145)

In the Holy Quran, God declared His intention to punish the Israelite Jews over and over again and expelling them if they kept on desecrating the Holy Land with violations of the condition of faith and righteous conduct:
“….but if ye revert (to your violation of the condition imposed for inheritance of the Holy Land) We shall revert (to Our punishments. i.e., you will be expelled again and again)….”
(Qur’an, Banu Israil, 17:8)

For more than a thousand years after the final expulsion, the Israelite Jews remain scattered around the Jerusalem and the Holy Land.

Interestingly, as I have mentioned before in previous articles, the descendents of those who destroyed the Israelites returned as their "saviours." Among the tribes who were in the service of the Babylonian king were the Scythians, a ferocious tribe of barbarians from the north, who dwelled behind a great range known as Caucasus. Their atrocities on the known world of the time were legendary, and the mischief they created on earth was enough to send any civilization trembling in fear. Now scholars who studied Surah Al-Kahf stated that Dhul-Qarnayn, the just king, met a tribe of Georgians (located just outside of his empire, hence the difficulty in understanding their language), who have long suffered at the hands of the Scythians, as their town was very close to Daryal Gorge, the only road in and out to where the Scythians lived. God inspired Dhul-Qarnayn on the dangers of the Scythians thus making him construct the dam-like wall, cutting off the Scythians from ever causing mischief unto the world, for a time being.

The Scythians established a kingdom known as Khazaria later on, still located behind the Caucasus, and under pressure from the Russians in the east and the Muslims in the west, they converted to Judaism. The fall of the kingdom by the Russians sent the Khazars into Europe. It is in Europe that sent plotted their reign around the world. After attempts to buy the Holy Land from the Ottomans failed flat, they designed the destruction of the last Muslim Caliphate of the world through their proxys. It must be noted that by the late 19th century, a large number of caucasian jews have emigrated to areas outside of Jerusalem.

Just like the Quran stated that the Holy Land was given, or gifted to the Israelites (under strict divine terms and conditions) before, it was also prophesied in the Quran that the Israelites will return to Jerusalem and the Holy Land, but this time with a condition, which is also a chilling note for Muslims everywhere:

“And there is a ban on (the people of) a town which We destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim their town) until Gog and Magog are released and (eventually) they descend from every height (or spread out in every direction).”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95-6)

How do one justify the so-called liberation (in the eyes of the jews) of the Holy Land? The British snatched the land away from the Palestinians, and made deals with the jewish-terrorists who were still scattered outside of Jerusalem at the time. These terrorists were the atheistic zionists, who represent only a minute percentage of the jews around the world. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 promised the handover of the territories to the zionists by the British...well, hardly surprising,it's the British anyway. How do you justify granting somebody else's home to somebody else? But the prophecy was completed and the secular and godless state of Israel was born, with the non-semitic caucasian jews occupying Jerusalem and the Holy Land, and the Palestinians were to be made extinct by them.

So, in one group, we have the Semitic "Chosen People", who were granted the Holy Land,but never could maintain themselves from violating every single divine terms and conditions given to them, and not to mention, so accustomed in basing their comfortable life from a holy book that was altered to suit their needs. On the other hand, we have a group of non-Semitic savages, whose atrocities caused them to be contained behind a metal wall between the great range and who had evolved into Israelite-wanna-be, created the atheistic zionism, plotted the New World Order and the world domination. What has the combination of these 2 groups brought to the world? So far, we have seen sheer terrorism.

These jews,through their various satellites and organizations, have been funding leaders in Muslim and non-Muslim countries to change the geo-political structure in countries accross the world and create a more "Israel-friendly" Muslim countries. Malaysia has tasted the bitter poison that the jews tried to inject when pakatan attempted to create chaos in the country. In fact, where are the great leaders of pakatan on the current issue of Israeli atrocity? Maybe they learnt their lesson on not to be too vocal about it.

By the way, where are the pakatan leaders when Israeli decided to "flatten Gaza"?

The Prime Minister, Najib Abdul Razak and the President of Indonesia managed to voice out their concern and complaint to the newly re-appointed President of the United States, Barrack Obama on the plight of the Palestinians. Obama has promised action, but knowing that he is the leader of a satellite country of Israel, one can doubt as much as possible. The Malaysian leaders have taken extra-ordinary steps to mount support for the plight of the Palestinians, as they have always done so in the past. Even Tun Mahathir personally rallied to gain support and donations for Palestinians. Funds have been set up and concerned Malaysians have responded.

But Pas was too busy trying to mount support for themselves. Instead of praying for the well-being and safety of Palestinians, they were doing the pas-religion-only do'a for the death of fellow Muslims in UMNO. To add stupidity to the already brain-dead, n.ajis used his usual indirect statement, to which he declared that UMNO is apostate. Maybe he forgot that he is not God. Strangely, this caused a slight stir among those who had very little faith in their hearts, of which they asked about their status in religion. How do you do that, asking a man about a status which Allah alone knows.

Where was anwar ibrahim and his mulberry-bush daughter? Where's the million RM bus? Where's the jet plane? Why aren't the both of them using those vehicles to rally support for the Palestinians? Where's his fiery speeches against Israel? Oh yes, I forgot, the last time he was vocal about Israel, he had to bow, beg and kiss the jewish lobbyists' ass for forgiveness. I guess he has learnt his lesson. What do expect from a chap who supported the security of Israel? I am sure he is somewhere discreetly "criticizing" Israel via his blog and twitter, but never in public. Not to mention, even his MalaysiaKini is "quiet" on the issue of the Israeli air-strike, I mean, they usually pretended to be tigers when attacking UMNO or BN. After amplifying the number of pakatan rally attendants, MalaysiaKini seem to be strangely neutral in reporting that only 1,000 people turnedup for the anti-Israel demo. Well, what can I say, they have to be careful, their accounts rely on it.

What is there to say about the socialist dap? With their fatherland, Singapore being the satellite for US, which itself is a satellite for Israel, what else is there to say? The treacherous CIA and the murderous Mossad use the island as their base for South East Asia. Why do you think they keep mum?

While the Muslims in Malaysia remain fractured and the Muslim worlditself divided by ideologies and sects, the air strikes have no discrimination on Palestinians: the Muslims, Christians,  children, the old...everything is the target for extinction by the zionists.

Who has the right to control the Holy Land? Here's a clue from the Quran:
“And We declared in the Zabur (i.e., the Psalms) which followed (Our declaration in) the Zikr (i.e., the Torah) that it is (only) those servants of Mine who are righteous in their conduct who would inherit the (Holy) Land.”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:105)

When the Muslim army conquered the Holy Land some six hundred years after the last expulsion of the Jews by the Romans, a prophecy to that effect in the Qur’an was fulfilled:
“It is He Who has made you inheritors of the (Holy) Land: He has raised some of you by degrees above others that He might test you through that  which He bestowed upon you (Banu Israil got more than any other people): for thy Lord is swift in punishment: yet He is indeed Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
(Qur’an, al-An’am, 6:165)

In the Quran,it is stated that God punished the jews everytime they commit intolerable sins in the Holy Land, and they have been expelled twice. Now they're at it again, with a chilling twist as this time they are not alone, they are joined by a tribe who causes mischief on earth.

To those who tasted the sweet funds from the jews through bersih 1, 2,or 3, and other programs by pakatan, take a good look. The atrocities committed on the Palestinians in Gaza are from the same funds, maybe the Muslim Malays who have already belched and crapped those funds are happy and proud of this.

Hamas Rolling Over Anwar's Spins...Hamas Never Agreed With Anwar's Stand

I always remember my friends who were involved in volunteer aid groups, who spent time helping Palestinian refugees who had been victimized by the vile regime of the non-semitic zionist jews. Many of them keep telling how, everytime they tell the refugees that they are from Malaysia, the name Mahathir is uttered from their mouths. The same happened in Bosnia during the Balkan conflicts.

Tun Mahathir did so much that he can in standing up for the rights of the Palestinians and Bosnians. Even now, despite no more as a Prime Minister, he still dedicate a lot of his time for their plight. Undoubtedly, he is a celebrated statesman, although he himself never admitted to be one.

On the far side of the scale, we have the questionable anwar ibrahim. Since his release from prison, we have seen him working hard to pass himself as a statesman as well. He has even instructed his writers and bloggers to label him as a statesman, although nobody can be sure whether he's even fit to be an estates-man. Since Palestinians and Bosnians have no idea who he is, anwar dedicated himself as the champion for human rights, the new religion that is spreading fast around the world.

However, with his remarks about supporting Israel's security hitting Muslims in the face, anwar got more than what he bargained for. His name became famous, strangely not for the reasons he wished. Palestinians now know his name, though it can be assumed that they wish they never heard it. Anwar's name was even celebrated by Jerusalem Post, while Muslims were shocked and appalled. Well, I guess that's why sometimes you have to be careful with what you wish for, you might just get it albeit on the wrong end of the spectrum.

I have written, earlier this week, on anwar's supposed meeting with Hamas and sharing the same stand (article here ) Anwar has claimed that his stand, based supposedly on Ismail Haniyeh's statement, was understood and shared by Hamas. Given the timing and the events happening, it never really made sense. Let me recount them in chronological order:

2006 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was about to become the Palestinian Prime Minister, was quoted by Washington Post as saying:

“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognize them.”

2006 (a day later) - Ismail Haniyeh refuted the interview, saying that Washington Post misquoted him as he never made any statement saying that he will recognize Israel as a state. In short, the supposed stand stated by Washington Post never existed.

26 January 2012 - Anwar made his famour remark on his support for Israel - and starts using the Washington Post misquoted article as the basis of his stand

Early February 2012 - Hamas and Fatah signs and endorses an agreement in Doha, reconciling after years of conflict. Agreement stipulates only ruling and administrative details with nothing pointing to any stages or intentions of recognizing Israel as a state whatsoever.

11 February 2012 - Anwar Ibrahim's blog released 2 pictures showing him meeting the Hamas Leader, Khalid Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi. No details were given, and no other media in the world reported the meeting. Anwar's supporters mostly assume and claim that this is the meeting where anwar explained his stand, which is purportedly "in line" with the stand taken by Hamas on Israel.

11 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Iran, announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel

14 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh and Hamas officials conveyed their shock and dismay to anwar's support for Israel through Nasharuddin Mat Isa, MP for Bachok. Message was conveyed to him in Kuwait.

21 February 2012 - Anwar met with nik aziz, and during interview, he reiterated his stand, quoting almost all the points based on the Washington Post misreporting. In fact, he used the misquoted Washington Post report to justify his stand.

The update that burst anwar's bubbles is that Hamas, through the deputy chairman of its political bureau Dr Mousa Abu Marzook, denied sharing a similar stand as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who supports the security of Israel. (Full report here )

Dr Mousa also said Hamas will never recognise the Zionist regime as its existence is invalid.

Should anwar reiterate on somebody missing the part about "contingents" or "stages", let it be known that Dr Mousa has simply stated, "In any case, Hamas will not recognise Israel.” Period!

So what was anwar's meeting with Khaled Mashaal and Sheikh Yusoff Qaradawi all about? With their extreme stand, especially by Qaradawi on Israel and anybody who supports Israel, I don't think they will take anwar's stand kindly, let alone his claim that the stand was based on Hamas'.

Anwar's so-called human rights stand has so far taken him to Malaysia's dark alleys so far. His support for Lesbians, Gays, Bi-sexual and Transgendered, and now for Israel, has drawn fire from the Muslim community not just from Malaysia. Of course, by doing so, he has drawn himself as the darling of the west. It matters so much to him about the security of Israel, but not to the genocide brought about by the descendents of the tribe who were locked away behind a wall of iron and copper between the two ranges, who tried to pass themselves off as semites.

Let's face it: Tun Mahathir was branded as "anti-semitic" for his "Jews kill by proxy" statement. Even that label was ridiculous as only 21% of jews in Israel are semitic, while the rest of the semitic world are the Arabs. Anwar ranted during the Freedom Flotilla rally on the cruelty of Israel, yet bundles off to meet up jewish lobbyists in US to apologize and get support.

Anwar's statement of defence for the pro-Israel was riddled with pot-holes. It never made sense how leaders of Hamas with extreme views, such as killing any person who supports Israel, can even share and support anwar's position, and how anwar claimed that the stand was Hamas'. If it were, then Ismail Haniyeh wouldn't have announced that Hamas WILL NEVER recognize Israel during his visit to Iran shortly after that.

The jig is up, anwar. Where will he go from here? Many are betting that anwar will be spinning stories such as:
1) UMNO paid Hamas to say that statement
2) Hamas' policies/stand changed after he met them
3) Dr Mousa did not read anwar's whole statement
4) It was not Dr Mousa who made the statement, but an actor paid by UMNO
5) Hamas is like UMNO
etc etc...

I wonder how many times anwar has bamboozled Qaradawi into defending him since the famous "Qaradawi defended Anwar" vcd a few years back.

But who cares what anwar will spin. His spin on his pro-Israel statement has so far reached its end of its tether. Even before Dr Mousa's statement, it can be detected from their spins on how stressful it has become for pro-pakatan bloggers to defend anwar on this issue.

I am sure anwar and his cohorts are much busier, trying to spin Dr Mousa's statement, trying to sift through Tun Mahathir's letters so that they can twist it around, look for major plots to clear the "your-wife-is-my-sleeping-partner" badrul aming. We also understand that a major shipment of omega-sized panadols are being shipped to their office every now and then...well, at least they don't need lubricants.

Well, I have always noticed how anybody who has a scandal and issues that can threaten anwar's position "vanish" until such time. With Hamas still shocked and upset over anwar's statement, maybe anwar should just disappear...

Letters From Tun Mahathir

While anwar is strunggling to prove himself to his one-eyed sponsors that he is affable as a leader of a country, his problems are more compounded than ever with a string of "mishaps."

Pkr is facing flak from the public with the chap who had proclaimed him as the Mahdi. Yes, the self proclaimed ustaz who found it hard to keep his robes on, who claimed to be beaten by 20 men who never were and now suffering from injuries that doesn't exist. Not to mention, Kedah's Menteri Besar made it obvious through his statement that he's not bothered of anwar ibrahim and opted to follow hadi. Not enough with the tight slap from Azizan, anwar got stubbed up his behind when Haji Hadi chided the MP for Kuantan, Fuziah Salleh openly for not referring the Lynas issue to the right people as Pas has Che Rosli, a nuclear scientist who is also the MP for Hulu Langat. Then again, how can Hadi contend with Fuziah's arrogance in being ignorant?

As anwar has been taking swipes, accusing Tun Mahathir of being openly friendly with Israel, and of congratulating Israel. Well, anwar is facing a backlash now with the government releasing the letters by Tun to 2 Israeli Prime Ministers on seperate occassions.

Dr Mahathir's Letter To Benjamin Netanyahu

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 29 (Bernama) -- The following is the letter written by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel in 1997, as released by the Foreign Ministry here today.

PRIME MINISTER MALAYSIA


14 March 1997


His Excellency
Mr Benjamin Netanyahu
Prime Minister of Israel
JERUSALEM


Your Excellency,


Your letter dated January 23rd only reached me yesterday. I appreciate very much your taking the trouble to inform me on the situation in Palestine and the region. Unfortunately much of what you have written has been overtaken by events.


Malaysia believes in peace and in settlement of problems between neighbours through negotiations. As a last resort, we turn to third parties. In disputes over territories between Malaysia and Singapore and Malaysia and Indonesia we have agreed to get the World Court to decide. Dispute between Malaysia and Thailand over territorial waters was resolved by agreeing to share the non-marine resources equally.

Within the country, disparities in wealth distribution between the indigenous people and those of immigrant origins were resolved through affirmative action in which the have knots would have a bigger share of a growing economic cake but there would be no expropriation and redistribution of what already belonged to the descendants of immigrants. Everyone has very nearly a fair share now and everyone is fairly satisfied. Relations between the different races in Malaysia are good and not disruptive.


The important point I would like to stress is not to take what already belongs to others even though historically they may be yours. Lately, Israel has been pulling down Arab dwellings in order to erect houses for Israelis. The whole world, including your ally, the United States condemns this. But Israel has gone ahead.


You condemn Syria for making threats. But their threats are the response to your own action. If you forcibly take over land and property belonging to the Palestinians, the only response if they are not to violently act against you, is to threaten to act against you. If they cannot retaliate and they cannot voice their intended retaliation, than they would have to submit to all your action no matter how wrong. What you are doing now is against the spirit and the letter of the peace process agreed to by your predecessor. How can we trust Israel if a change in the government negates solemnly given undertakings by a Government of Israel. Please reconsider your decision to build new Jewish settlements on Arab land.


The Israeli youths are here. Our intention is to show them that Muslims are normal rational people who want to live in peace and freedom. We hope that they will have a new impression of Muslims and Islam. There will be aberrations among Muslims but there are also aberrations among Jews and Christians and people of every religion. No religion should be judged by these aberrations. We hope that the youths will understand Muslims better and will want to be at peace with them. To have peace you have to make sacrifices. The Palestinians no longer demand the elimination of Israel. They are even prepared to share Jerusalem with you. They have made sacrifices.


We should remember that when Jews were persecuted in Europe, they had always found sanctuary among Muslims in Muslim countries. We don't regard Israelis as eternal enemies. But we cannot help but sympathise with the Palestinians because their land is being taken away from them now. It may have belonged to Jews three thousand years ago. A lot of traditional Malay land have been made part of Thailand. But we are not claiming Southern Thailand as part of Malaysia. If we go too far into the past we cannot live with our neighbours.


We are ready to have economic and technological cooperation with Israel but we cannot do so yet because you have not honoured commitments made by a legitimate Government of Israel. We would like to think that once we have established relations with you, it would be permanent.


DR MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD


--BERNAMA

Dr Mahathir's Letter To Ehud Barak

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 29 (Bernama) -- The following is the letter written by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to Ehud Barak, Prime Minister Elect of Israel, in 1999, as released by the Foreign Ministry here today.

PRIME MINISTER MALAYSIA


8 June 1999


His Excellency
Mr Ehud Barak Prime Minister Elect of Israel
TEL AVIV


Your Excellency,


May I extend my congratulations on your victory in the recent elections. With this impressive mandate, I hope that you and your coalition partners will be able to guide the destiny of the people of Israel at the threshold of a new Century.


I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate that Malaysia has always sought peace and the settlement of problems between neighbours through negotiations. It is therefore our hope to see the mutual implementation of the agreements signed between the PLO and Israel. We also believe that if the peace process is to be salvaged, sincere and effective steps must be taken to honour commitments.

As an important partner in the peace process it is crucial for Israel to be more accommodating. The Palestinians have made major sacrifices. They no longer demand the elimination of Israel. They are even prepared to share Jerusalem with you. It is therefore timely that Israel respond positively so as to sustain the hopes of the people in both Palestine and Israel. Solemn commitments made by a previous Government must be honoured. The alternative I am afraid, would be a permanent state of conflict and regional instability extending into the next Century. This is certainly a prospect that must be avoided.


The crux of the problem is that no party should revert to the old ways of taking what belongs to others, on the one hand and instigating hatred and violence, on the other. Malaysia cannot countenance aggression by anyone, whether friend or foe. Any country that forcibly takes over land and properties of others, or demolishes dwellings belonging to others in order to set up its own settlements cannot be said to be sincere in wanting peace.


Malaysia is of the firm conviction that the security of all countries in West Asia can only be assured with the establishment of a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace in the region. This must be based on the principle of "exchange of land for peace" and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.


The world looks forward to Israel under your leadership, to push forward the peace process with true determination. It is my sincere hope that the attainment of a comprehensive settlement in the region would allow Malaysia to realistically envisage a positive move towards the establishment of normal relations with Israel.


Yours sincerely,


DR MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD


-- BERNAMA

Maybe Tun's less than friendly but diplomatically toned letter drew ire from anwar, as both letters proves that there was nothing friendly between Malaysia under Tun Mahathir and Israel. So far, the only one supports Israel using a non-existent Hamas stand is anwar ibrahim.

Anwar's headache is now apparent, he will now have to rely on his spin-master, the deluded saifuddin nasution to find any way to turn this story around. Most probably, he will take something out of context, as usual, and spin it around to any imbeciles that might believe the pro-Israel leader of pakatan.

That's anwar, in 2008 he looks like he is running a country; now, well, he looks like he's trying to run away from the country.

Anwar Met Hamas? When Did Who Say What?

It all began with his statement to the Wall Street Journal:

"I support all efforts to protect the security of the state of Israel," said Mr. Anwar, although he stopped short of saying he would open diplomatic ties with the Jewish state, a step which he said remains contingent on Israel respecting the aspirations of Palestinians. Malaysia has consistently refrained from establishing diplomatic relations with Israel, although limited commercial ties exist between private companies in the two countries.
Full article here

From his statement above, it can be clearly seen that anwar is a proponent of the "two-state solution", which has been championed by the west, whereby 2 states will be recognized, Palestine and Israel.

Anwar was quoted as saying that he had explained to pas spiritual leader, n.ajis what he had explained to the leader of Hamas, Khaled Mashal during his meeting with Khaled and Sheikh Yusuf Qardhawi.


In short he stated that he met Khaled Mashaal and Khaled understood that Israel will only be recognized once all the contingents or pre-requisites are honored, or obeyed.

It should be a nice ending with anwar meeting the top leader of Hamas and Qardawi, we were even treated with nice pictures of anwar and the two leaders. In fact, all of these would be a very sweet ending to the whole "Anwar-pro-Israel" statement that he made to the Wall Street Journal.

Anwar posted on his blog, 2 pictures of him meeting Khaled Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusof Qardawi but kept mum on what were discussed. Other pro-anwar blogs followed suit with the pictures, but with no explanation. It's very strange that no media in Palestine and the world reported or mentioned this meeting in their newspapers, television, radio and/or their on-line publications. We spent hours searching the net for any news on the meeting itself and/or what they discussed about.

All searches on the net on anwar meeting Hamas leaders only return to anwar's blog. So, how come only anwar's blog claimed that he met Khaled Mashal without anydescription of what transpired? To say that all other medias in the world were on leave is highly speculative. When exactly did they meet?

We find it bizarre: when anwar stated his infamous remarks of supporting the security of Israel, it was reported on a global scale. The Islamic world views it as a sort of a death wish on anwar's part. Anwar should be pleased, after years of self proclaiming himself as a statesman, he finally got a reaction like one. The man stirred the Muslim world, and yet when he meets Hamas leaders, nobody bothers to report on the situation. In fact, no where can be found that Hamas met, discussed or even agreed with anwar's stand.

So, what did anwar claim he told n.ajis? Basically, what he claimed that a view shared by Hamas and himself: Anwar said he had explained that his stand on Israel is consistent with that of the Palestinian political factions Hamas and Fatah.

"I feel good as I could explain. In the end I said I follow the desires of Hamas and Fatah and what was negotiated among them in Doha two weeks ago," he said.


Anwar also, in the video above, quoted Ismail Haniyeh, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority representing Hamas:


“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognize them.”


Anwar also claims that the Hamas leader is clear on his stand and understands it.

We have searched media archives on the net looking for this, as we could not find this stand made by either Hamas, but we did find that the quote was made by Ismail Haniyeh in 2006, just days before becoming the Prime Minister, which was reported by The Washington Post. (An copy still available here)

However, a day later, Ismail Haniyeh made a statement that Washington Post misquoted him; that he never made any statement or has any intention of recognizing Israel. Full article here 

Alleviating anwar's problem, on 11th of February 2012, while in Iran, Ismail Haniyeh announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, full article here 

How could anwar claim that what he has explained is the stand that Hamas took, when Ismail Haniyeh himself refuted it? Whose stand did he share, Hamas or Washington Post? How come he used a refuted 6-year old interview as his basis?

Does N.ajis share his view on the "two state solution"? This report clears the air, here

So, anwar, when did who say what? His interview in the video above clearly shows his support for a two state solution, a stand that Hamas clearly condemn. Did anwar actually explain his stand to Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi? If he did, I'm surprised anwar got back to Malaysia fully intact. Here's part of a profile on Qardhawi:

Qaradawi similarly expressed his desire to see a "conquered" Jerusalem in a January 24, 2011, fatwa in which he negated Jewish attachment to Jerusalem and stated that it is the duty of Muslims to"defend" Jerusalem with "their lives, their money and all they possess, or else they will be subject to Allah's punishment."


This fatwa is part of Qardhawi's long record of inciting violence against Jews and Israel. During a sermon that aired on the Arabic satellite channel Al-Jazeera TV on January 28, 2009, Qaradawi told his audience, "I will shoot Allah's enemies, the Jews, and they will throw a bomb at me, and thus I will seal my life with martyrdom." In another sermon on January 9, 2009, Qaradawi lashed out at Jews, including calling on God to "kill them, down to the very last one."


He has also refused to dialogue with Jews. Qardawi declined to participate in the 8th annual conference organized by the Doha International Center for Interfaith Dialogue because of the participation of Jews.


In a statement released by Qaradawi's office, he reportedly said, "How can we conduct a dialogue in a time when they seize lands, shed blood, burn farms, and demolish houses? Palestine's conundrum has to be resolved first before we sit together at the same table."
(Reference taken from Dr. MIM, here)

Even anwar's attempt to have the contingents honored before giving recognition to the state of Israel contravenes the 1988 fatwa issued by 66 mufti that any action that gave recognition to Israel's existence is an act that opposes Islam, or does anwar really not bothered? Doesn't his action also swipe Sheikh Yusoff Qardhawi in his face?

Anwar claimed that his stand is in-line with Hamas and Fatah's stand when he met the groups in Doha two weeks earlier. The Hamas-Fatah Deal signed and endorsed in Doha has nothing about a "two-state solution" nor any mention or intention of recognizing Israel as a state. The Doha Agreement by Hamas and Fatah is a move to reconciliate both parties after years of conflict. (Read here) In fact, check out the Hamas Charter here. No where we can find anything on the terms and recognition.

For Hamas and Fatah to reach and seal the agreement in Doha, they would have to be unanimous in their stand and secisions. Any terms or attempts to recognize Israel as a state in a slightest way will end up with more hostility between the two groups. Do you think any of these 2 share the stand that anwar claim?

What was the point of accusing Malaysian media of twisting his statement on his support for Israel by deleting the word "contingent" when anwar himself twisted and used a misquoted statement made 6 years ago by Ismail Haniyeh to The Washington Post, and disguising it to make it look as if it is the stand stated by Hamas?

Despite all that anwar claimed, we understand that the Prime Minister of Palestine Authority, Ismail Haniyeh was outraged and saddened by anwar's support to Israel's security. How did we know that? Well, Ismail Haniyeh was told by YB Nasharuddin Mat Isa,when he met with Haniyeh in Kuwait. Nasharuddin was there as Pengerusi Pentadbiran Yayasan al-Quds Malaysia, a Malaysian foundation in aid of the Palestinian plight, chaired by YB Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir.

Let's simplify all of this chronologically, so that even Mahfuz can understand:

2006 - Ismail Haniyeh was quoted by Washington Post saying:

“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognise them.”


2006 (a day later) - Ismail Haniyeh refuted the interview, saying that Washington Post misquoted him as he never made any statement saying that he will recognize Israel as a state.

26 January 2012 - Anwar made his famour remark on his support for Israel - and starts using the Washington Post misquoted article as the basis of his stand

Early February 2012 - Hamas and Fatah signs and endorses an agreement in Doha, reconciling after years of conflict. Agreement stipulates only ruling and administrative details with nothing pointing to any stages or intentions of recognizing Israel as a state whatsoever.

11 February 2012 - Anwar Ibrahim's blog released 2 pictures showing him meeting the Hamas Leader, Khalid Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi. No details were given, and no other media in the world reported the meeting. Anwar's supporters mostly assume and claim that this is the meeting where anwar explained his stand, which is purportedly "in line" with the stand taken by Hamas on Israel.

11 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Iran, announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, putting more holes into anwar's claims

14 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh and Hamas officials conveyed their shock and dismay to anwar's support for Israel through Nasharuddin Mat Isa, MP for Bachok. Message was conveyed to him in Kuwait.

21 February 2012 - Anwar met with nik aziz, and during interview, he reiterated his stand, quoting almost all the points based on the Washington Post misreporting. In fact, he used the misquoted Washington Post report to justify his stand.

Again, anwar, when did who say what? Why was it so difficult for you to retract the Israel support statement? I guess to be the one-eyed's bitch is better than being a group of displaced and oppressed people who are fighting with their lives for their freedom. Why? Hey, the one-eyed's organizations can one day make him a Prime Minister!

It seems that n.ajis distanced himself from anwar's statement, and yet pas remains in the totally misleading pakatan. According to anwar, the pas spiritual leader accepted his stand. One question arises: does anybody in pas ever make references and research over what anwar stated? If anybody has any reference that Hamas did actually make their stand as what anwar claim, please send me a link.

Looking at how the religious ones are abandoning pas, I wonder if n.ajis will be the solitary figure to demand retractions and apologies from anwar over the Israel remark? Or keep himself quiet in fear of reprisals from anwar followers in pas? 


Anwar might need to explain more, such as when was his meeting with the Hamas leader and maybe some clarification from them. In the meantime, can we send somebody to meet up with Hamas and/or Ismail Haniyeh and clarify anwar's story...or shall I say, work of fiction?

DAP's All Hot Air and Total Stinker

As I have predicted, nothing much happened over the weekend, although there were some moments of life...no, nothing to do with the Pas Muktamar, that was a doozy. I was talking about World Cup. Well, the World Cup over the weekend was something like the Pas Muktamar. The difference is, watching World Cup’s Argentina and South Korea games really brought everything to life. If Anwar Ibrahim wanted to carry out a coup de tat on Pas during the weekend, he could’ve gotten it done hands down as ¾ of the delegates were fast asleep. Of course, the STAR’s Joceline Tan did mention the silence in PAS’ delegates, but I feel that she’s too kind to mention that they were fast asleep.

Something I watched on TV before the weekend actually tweaked my interest. The Prime Minister finished tabling The Tenth Malaysia Plan and there were buzzes of comments everywhere, and Bernama quoted Tony Pua, the DAP Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara as saying:

"Kita khuatir dasar penswastaan ini akan mengulangi apa yang berlaku pada tahun 1980 dan tahun 1990 pada zaman era pemerintahan bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.”

Well said and done to the man who said these words but doesn’t really know where to stick it. It is understandable how much hatred DAP has for Tun Mahathir as they virtually lost every single war-of-words with him, and not to mention Tun always having the last word every time. To crowning glory, which is the final insult to DAP (and PAS), despite DAP and Pas’ claims that Malaysia is never an Islamic country, Malaysia was chosen as the Chairperson of the OIC during the era of Tun Mahathir.

I remember back in 1999, Lim Kit Siang and Karpal Singh were defeated in Penang, as a result for their cooperation with Pas. Ironically, during the campaigns, Lim Kit Siang was also known as “Mahathir’s Pet Opposition.” Why? I have no idea. It was the most testing time for Tun Mahathir in 1999 with pro-Anwar sentiments, but BN managed to secure 2/3 majority, much to Barisan Al-Tenat-if’s chagrin.

Looking back, the transformation from a backwater country to a globally recognized nation (much to Singapore’s anger) was strategically engineered by Tun. Many people, doesn’t matter from which ethnic group, recognizes that Tun’s visions are rarely for the present, but for the future. The bullying British were given a tight slap when the Look East policy and Buy British Last came up, the United Nations were poked up their noses for their kiasu management of the Bosnian massacre, America and Israel were lambasted again and again for their roles in the murder of millions of Palestinians. Singapore? Well, the island much adored and worshipped by DAP were clapped in iron and tongue tied to stop Tun Mahathir from making Malaysia a far more recognized

country compared to the island state. Australia? They usually exist to be kicked around by Tun Mahathir for thinking that just because they are Caucasians, they have a right to boss everybody around.

For all the things Tun have fought for globally, he has been branded anti-Semitic. This is very strange as the percentage of Semitic Jews in Israel alone is 21% of the total population and the rest of the Semitic groups are their brethren, the Arabs. We should say, “Nice try” to the non-Semitic Caucasian Jews but please, we are not fooled.

It must be very upsetting for DAP that a Malay leader of Malaysia has the capacity and vision to transform Malaysia with such vigorous tenacity, instead of Lim Kit Siang…and/or his boss, Lee Kuan Yew. When Tun announced the construction of Penang Bridge, a DAP leader stated that if it ever completes, he will personally jump…which he did, off DAP and into MCA. They basically complaint on almost anything that was designed for the future of modern Malaysia, but later on used it as if they owned the utility.

As DAP claims itself as a “democratic” (although socialist) party, they talk much about against the use of Internal Security Act, or ISA. On this issue, Tun Mahathir was condemned again and again. Sometimes it becomes a farce, as Singapore’s PAP (from which DAP is the off-spring) uses the same act of its opponents, but kept mum by DAP. Maybe they were afraid of their Boss, or they might be afraid that something might not reach them if they voice out.

Only now DAP claims to have a lot Malays as members although everybody knows DAP is a Lim dynasty party. Anwar thought he was responsible for DAP’s triumph in the 2008 elections, much to the amusement of DAP leaders. What actually happened? The only thing Anwar was responsible for was providing DAP the valuable insights on bamboozling the Muslim Malays into lapping up everything they dish. In fact, even DAP was astounded; when they quoted the Qur’an for the sake of a socialist state, the Malays will be so impressed and touched, greeting it with “Wow” and “Whoa”. Their proudest moment? DAP leaders can just stay indoor, watch TV and clap when they see how much the Muslim Malays go against their own people, their own rulers and their own wits in defense of the socialist dap state of Perak. I think by now, the Malays can be confirmed that they exist only to be riding donkeys of DAP and Pakatan Rakyat.

That was something they could never do when Mahathir was in power as he was very protective of the Malays. Of course, Pak Lah’s time was the time of dread nobody wants to remember.

DAP is always ever so ready to jump into matters which they feel will benefit them. Maybe that’s why the DAP is sweating profusely when British forensics expert Professor Dr Peter Vanezis debunked Dr Pornthip’s claims that Teoh Beng Hock was not murdered. Pornthip’s absence and antics might just give them a fright every now and then. Then again, we believe DAP will definitely find the truth in the Teoh Beng Hock case, but they might not accept the truth if it doesn’t go in their direction.

Tun Mahathir brought Malaysia at least 30 years ahead of its time, some people managed to catch up, some got left behind and a few more lost their way. Many Chinese, Malays and Indians benefited from it, and…what have DAP contributed to the modernization of Malaysia? Even with all the complaints in past, we don’t see the Penang DAP government tearing down the Penang Bridge, which they termed as “white elephant” in the past. There has been nothing but hot air blowing from DAP since the independence of Malaysia in 1957, and we shall more hot air blowing from their..errr…head, not just from Tony Pua, but the rest of pakatan as well. I guess they can release their steam by tainting Tun Mahathir in every statement they made, the progress has already been made, and DAP contributed nothing.

When the Dust Settles, Somewhere In The World Doesn't Change

On June 6th 2010, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said that the 12 Malaysian activists who were on board a Gaza-bound aid ship subjected to a violent and bloody Israeli attack on Monday had achieved a huge moral victory for Malaysia and its people. Click Here For Full Article

I have no arguments there. The plight of the Palestinians and the victims of the Israeli attack have tremendously been heightened to a global level. Countless blogs, countries all around the world condemned the violence and arrogance of Israel. Demonstrations and even riots erupted in major cities.

NGOs with members comprising of UMNO and Pas members carried out peace demonstrations (somehow worrying Anwar Ibrahim and DAP) while in the parliament, both Government and Opposition show their strength in unity in approving the motion against Israel and urging that Israel should be hauled to the International Court of Justice...something that might never happen anywhere in the near future.

Let's hope I'm wrong about that. Also, in a rare move, Anwar condemns US for protecting Israel, and we will never be sure of his future after that move.

I must say, Alhamdulillah that all Malaysian volunteers are safe and safely returned home, and given a rousing welcome at the airport. I must say that, although they arrived dazed and shaken, they deserve the heroic welcome as they have stared the devil in the face and survived.

What's my point in writing this not-too-long article? A simple one: Our volunteers have arrived home, the others sent home too, the dead buried with honors, our volunteers ready to be witnesses for ICC,

demonstrations will continue for the next few days or weeks. When all the dust has settled, the Palestinians are still oppressed, still hungry, without medical supplies and/or raw materials. The aid which was in the Freedom Flotilla (Malaysian aid alone is plus minus RM1.4million worth) will never reach the Palestinians, despite any guarantees Israel can give. Everybody suffers and strikes for the Palestinians, and the ordeal might make heroes and martyrs out of them, but the Palestinians are still deprives. Bravo to the undying spirit of our volunteers who are ever so eager to ship out again despite their horrific experiences. All our prayers now go to the Palestinians, who have shown the world that they will never stop fighting for their right to exist in the land that was ripped away from them.