Sacrificing The Nation's Independence For A Few Dollars More

So what's the big deal about anwar and his pakatan coming up with a new flag to replace the Malaysian Jalur Gemilang, a new constitution and even a new national anthem? They are, after all, proponents of the politics of hate...well, maybe that's why Malaysians hate them. It's too easy for them to device all of these...in short, they did not come up with those, their sponsors did.

We do understand why pakatan want to do so in many levels. I mean, why would pakatan want to follow something that has been established by the forefathers of independence? Yes, it was the Perikatan (precursor to Barisan Nasional) who were responsible for the creation of the flag, national anthem and constitution, and pakatan can never stay quiet with that fact. They would want something that "they" alone created...well, maybe something to appease their paymasters as well.

Of course, at the moment, their excuse will be that everything was made by the British...still, it is much better than having them made by pakatan's sponsors who Malaysians will have to bow to and sacrifice their freedom once they are in control.

For years, we have seen anwar asking for funds from various countries and organizations. There has to be reasons why he was begging for forgiveness from them over the Freedom Flotilla incident in US. We have seen how Singapore officials, during by-elections travelling with Pakatan bigwigs and even participate in the jewish-sponsored bersih 3. They have to be there, they need to look after their investments. Is it surprising to see that the so-called "new flag" resembles Singaporean flag? Or do we still wonder why the racist DAP's logo still resemble their master, PAP of Singapore's logo? Maybe we can finally figure who actually designed the flag? Who never knew that Singapore is the South East Asia base for CIA (and other organizations linked to the one eyed)?

On a very rare occasion, I was corresponding with the Editor of Mathaba.net, an alternative news media organization about a month ago. The organization was previously set up by Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. Today, I have no idea who they are under but they still write scathing attacks on Malaysia. Previously, they republished an article by Harakah, attacking Tun Mahathir (click here for article)over his remarks on anwar. At that point, I feel that it was hypocrisy on their part as their views on anwar ibrahim is such:

By email
From: Mathaba DotNet  
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:54 AM

...As to the opposition. Just today I had a long conversation with one of Malaysia's top lawyers, and I must say, one of the best men in the world, from a personal and character point of view. I'm proud to say that his views and my own, regarding the opposition and situation in Malaysia, concur almost 100%. Even on this analysis of the sword incident.

Basically, let me explain a little. Anwar Ibrahim, and the NGO that is chasing the submarine issue etc, these have immense advantages over the government or indeed any other party. Do you think AI needs to think or make policies or decisions? No. He has an army of psychologists, propagandists, financiers, all behind him, all in America or wherever, sending him daily reports and funds, what to say, what to attack. His job is easy. It's smooth.

Strange, that's not the first journalist I read or heard of something like that, yet their publications support anwar in total. I guess even they had to obey their paymasters.

What is the strength of these funding? For most Malaysians, being Muslims and aware of the western oppression on Islam is good enough to make all to be careful of these western agendas. In theory, perhaps, but in reality, the funds have made its rounds and we can see how individuals change:

1) The so-called Bersih demonstrations have demonstrated how money, even a little, changes people. Pakatan brought in and paid rioters to run riot and destruction in a location, and at the same time, use them as news for the western media if ever the police take action. Of course, they were also paid to provoke the police into retaliating. It's a good strategy by NED and Open Society to fund this event to make it look as if Malaysia is under oppression.

2) This young man (as pictured) was paid to show his buttocks onto a picture of leaders, a symbol of expressing his dissatisfaction. He was also proud to show his buttocks to the public, which only goes to show the morality of himself. I am sure his parents taught him better. But he doesn't care, he is being paid with funds from other organizations of the one-eyed. Not to mention, those people who spent time stepping on the country leader's pictures. Of course, pay a little bit more, they have no problems stomping on their fathers and mothers.

3) To ensure the constant incoming of funds from their paymasters, pas is ever so ready to get rid anybody who stands for Islam. Hassan Ali was booted for standing up for Muslims, and next in line, maybe the under-fire Nasharuddin Mat Isa. It has always been interesting to see how scholars from pas' ulama faction like Nasharuddin have been discarded for empty vessels of the Erdogan faction like mat sapu, who basically has none of the religious knowledge not has any morality within himself. But pas needs the money, so to them, this has nothing to do with religion as I slam only serves as a factor for them to get votes.

Still on point 3, pas changed the most with the western/jewish funding. Among the 3 components of pakatan, pas has always been the poorest. In the past, their income usually comes from donation and some from the Tabung Memali. Now, their rallies are lavish and most of their leaders are well dressed, and now they struggle teeth and nails to preserve what they enjoy, even if it means sacrificing Islam from their basic fight. The ulama faction has been discarded like garbage in order to cater half-witted and Islamic knowledge lacking erdogan-backed leaders like mat sabu and mahfuz. The influx of former entertainers who lack religious knowledge taking place on their ceramah platforms seems like a move to replace the ulama faction. Any ulama in the world that makes any statement against pas, they will be slandered against. What have the funds turn pas into? Well, I guess the hadith below kinda reminds me of pas:

Dari Sahl bin Saad as-Saaidi r.a. berkata: Rasulullah s.a.w bersabda; "Ya Allah! Jangan kau temukan aku dan mudah-mudahan kamu (sahabat) tidak bertemu dengan suatu masa di mana para ulama sudah tidak diikut lagi, dan orang yang penyantun sudah tidak disegani lagi. Hati mereka seperti hati orang Ajam (pada fasiqnya), lidah mereka seperti lidah orang Arab (pada fasihnya)." (Riwayat Ahmad)

I guess for pas, it is easy to discard Islam in return for foreign funding. Why? Well, as I have written before, pas has never been Islamic, but we know that already. Islam is only a point they use to secure votes for themselves, or to scare people into voting them.

There's a catch, however. Remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch. There are requirements that you need to fulfill to get these foreign funds. Of course, along with that, you'll get the aid of the western media who can twist and spin any issues to your advantage. We have seen, back during the west's designed Currency Crisis in the late 1990s, how Tun Mahathir pushed away IMF's offer of loans as the requirements, if met, will only stand to destroy the Malays' economy. The same factor is met here. What are the requirements? We don't know but from what anwar is campaigning for, we can guess what will be sacrificed:

1) Islam to be taken off from being the official religion of Malaysia. Organizations like the IFC will have a free hand where Muslims are free to apostate without interference from any religious departments.

2) Human rights equality will be imposed: no such thing as Malay Special Privileges. Malays will share equal rights to everybody, although the other races will never share their economic power and wealth with the Malays.

3) With Islam removed and equality imposed, the Lesbian, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgendered organizations will also have their rights implemented.

So far, I wrote 3 elements that will be sacrificed. With the three main factors removed, one can only guess what the other things will be. For DAP, this will be good news: not only they win the second round of May 13th, the cheering crowd will be consisted of Muslims as well. They will also have a field day dismantling the Hak Istimewa Melayu and anything Islamic. Pas will just be an errand boy who is tasked with justifying their means and ends.

It feels good when you have organizations who can back you up financially, but they will never see how expensive it is to repay until it is too late. By the time they realize? Well, we'll be in the New World Order already, worshipping a one-eyed hybrid who claims himself god. To these organizations, funding groups like pakatan, sponsoring riots and chaos in the Muslim countries, arming Israel so that more Palestinians can be slaughtered is nothing to them as they have trillions of dollars in assets and hard cash. They don't mind "investing" in certain individuals or political groups, if it is sound and brings back good returns...although the returns do not have to be in cash, just domination" the New World Order. Once the country falls into their hands, with their puppets running the country under their thumb, their mission is complete.

Are we approaching the end of our independence?

To the participants of Bersih and the twits who were showing off their butt in public, I guess you are the proof of how strong the jewish sponsors are. Maybe the money is sweeter because you don't really have to work for it. To the Muslim Malays in pakatan, enjoy now because once pakatan is in power under the one-eyed organizations, you might just become beggars on your own land.
Pakatan had an open house in Alor Setar today, in conjunction with their Jajah Merdeka Malaysia tour. The turnout was not that good, except for the usual supporters from out-of-state. Why is that so? Do Kedahans like me refuse to go to events and eat food that is prepared by jewish sponsorship?

Do we still take our independence for granted?

Suaram Sponsored By...Really Anwar, You Can't Fool Us Anymore

The cat is now out of the bag...well, seeing the details again, I guess the dreadful pakatan is being overrun by felines at the moment. It's all out in the open finally. Suaram, or Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd is nothing but a RM2 company registered under the SSM. What, with all the hundreds of thousands of dollars they receive, it still remains a RM2 company. What's worse, as suspected, suaram is nothing but a company, disguised as an NGO, funded by foreign powers...well, some bloggers say CIA, but as CIA is just one of the many arms of the west, I might just say differently.

The main problem for them now is: nobody's surprised anymore.

Who is this group who calls themselves suaram? On paper, they are the "reasoning voice" for the people of Malaysia and strives for human rights...yes, it's that magic word again: the western human rights where religion is tossed into the garbage bin. The best con-job by this group is that they try to pass themselves as "Suara Rakyat Malaysia." For pakatan supporters who are now devout one-eyed worshippers, this people are idolized but to Malaysians, they are nothing but stooges and pawns used by the west. Below are the who's who of Suaram...and most of the time I am still trying to figure out who are some of those people, except for the obvious twerps and The Zina Warrior Princess...

I have written before on how the one-eyed, via the descendents of the people who were locked away behind the 2 mountains who now resides in the west, keep tabs on countries around the world. Just like fashion, world administration goes out of style too. Once, they backed military coup de tats and dictatorships, but since the last few decades, the trend changes as they begin to doubt the practicality of backing this method. So, the old leaders of Egypt, Indonesia, Libya and even Tunisia were tossed to the wolves and they began scouting for new. The National Endowment for Democracy even confirmed that they have been active in post-Mubarak Egypt. President George W Bush even approved more than USD400m sponsoring candidates opposing Ahmidinejad in Iran to create chaos and unrest during the election a few years back.

The west has many eyes, and maneuvers with many hands, and CIA is just one of them. They collect vital intelligence on individuals, countries and organizations. They have plotted the downfall of certain leaders of certain countries and plotted to install leaders of their own choosing, all of this just to keep their interests in the respective country. However, the leaders they choose are expendable. The west can kick them out in different methods. Mubarak must've felt abandoned when his great ally turned their backs on him. The new Egyptian President, Muhammad Mossi, has already issued a warning to the west about interfering the country's affairs. He should get rid of those "NGOs" such as NED and KAF, although that will not guarantee the west not interfering with them.

Not all funding are given directly from these foreign powers to political oppositions of the particular countries. Mostlt it's all about trust. History notes that the CIA sponsored an obscure Islamist party in Indonesia in the 1960s, and somehow that money "disappeared." Some are done discreetly by transferring them to certain bodies, such as local NGOs, and this seems to be the favorite method. This is usually because not all locals believe westerners, so by appointing local agents, the locals will have no idea that they're playing the fiddle for the foreign conductors. In some aspects, it can be quite cheap: anwar can get terrorists from the one-eyed pas (formerly known as Unit Amal) for free...well, maybe with food, accommodation and transport taken care of.

We are lucky enough to witness the abomination of how the west sponsors unrest in our country and the Middle East. These "local" NGOs, including the other non-existent NGOs who support bersih co-ordinated well with agents from other countries and the western media. We have seen the riot being orchestrated by anwar, we saw how tian chua led his followers to attack the police and the moment the police retaliate, they started taking pictures for the western media to publish. They also tried hard to suppress acts of terrorism by bersih spectators from the world. The Singapore expats were there to observe the riot? Many believe that they were there to ensure that their investment is well spent. Still, their investment ran short when they failed to create a western-assisted "regime change." As if we never knew that Singapore is CIA's South East Asian base.

Qur'an 3:54
And (the unbelievers) plotted and planned, and Allah too planned, and the best of planners is Allah.

God is great, anwar and his agents must've miscalculated or under-estimated the Malaysians: the police set up more cameras than anwar could ever imagine. Through that, the reality of anwar and his agents' grand design was witnessed by Malaysians.

Suaram has always been known to hate anything that reveals the truth about themselves. The revelation by Gobalakrishnan was greeted by a very irate cynthia gabrial who started labeling him as "frog." Maybe she'll start kicking a fuss and hold her breath until she turns blue when more revelations are made, or at least she'll huff, and she'll puff, and she'll blow her cheap toupee down. Even her latest tweet on being able to avoid police warrant sounded so much like a kid venting her frustrations. But that's that, even so, the secret is out. She might just have to be a different agent after this, most probably selling insurance.

With the exposure of being a con-job while being funded around RM900,000 in the past 2 years, suaram, along with the other west-sponsored NGOs in Malaysia might find their dreams of sitting on high chairs destroyed as their conspiracy to destroy Malaysia and plan a regime change came to a humiliating end. With RM900,000.00 spent (or more), they still have nothing to show but their bare asses.

Is it a surprise that suaram is actually a foreign agent? How can it be on Malaysia's side when they do not care about the safety and welfare of fellow Malaysians and spent most of the times trying to destroy a nation? That's not Malaysian at all. They want to talk about human rights but they don't care about Saiful Bukhary being sodomized as they rally to anwar, they don't even care about the police who were seriously injured during riots but they trust more what the western media paints than what they saw themselves. They spend most of their times trying to topple Najib over the Scorpene submarine agenda but they were given a can of whoop-ass by the French .and that was no French kiss. How would a group like suaram claim themselves non-partisan, when they themselves are Pakatan politicians and aligned to anwar? That is the true quality of being one-eyed on their part: biased, un-Islamic, with dark intentions and funded by the west, but bangs their empty drums to Malaysians that they are fair and just.

How fair and just can suaram and other pakatan-aligned NGOs can be when they run agendas strategized and funded by a group outside of their country, and that group has been responsible for the chaos, anarchy and deaths of Muslims and non-Muslims all over the world, all of these just to ensure their interests are well preserved? How could a so-called Islamic party like pas be in this quagmire, unless they themselves have been blinded in one eye?

Anwar and his deceitful pakatan are in trouble. Their issue-manufacturers have been exposed for all the crap they are. It is just as bad as the exposure of anwar's RM3b accounts. Will the west still take their chance on anwar, or consider him a liability like Soeharto, Marcos or even Mubarak? If he is lucky, he will remain just an opposition, and at worse...I don't know, we have seen their fates.

Another question arises: how could suaram be so careless to have a Sdn Bhd company as a front? Or the west is actually trying to get rid of them as they have become liabilities?

I think it's about time the authorities check on the other NGOs and organizations that are linked to anwar, such as Merdeka Center.

We used to, and still have a name for people who try to destroy their country by being pawns funded by foreign powers: TRAITORS.

After All The One Eyed's And West' Aid, Why Is Anwar Still The Opposition?

It must be said here that, the Holy Al-Al Qur’an and Hadith have forewarned the Muslims of the days to come. The messages may be cryptic and deciphering them on the whole might require more knowledge than human have now. We can be assured that some theories have been advanced and the world looks in a different way. The wall built to seal off the group of people who “causes mischief on earth" have long crumbled. Those people have already inter-bred with the people mainly in the west, where the sun is rising from now. The one-eyed, at one point of hidden history has met them and collaborated with each other, but each of them keeps a suspicious at each other as both parties want to dominate the world.

With the creation of the illegal secular state of Israel after World War 2, concentrations were given in keeping the security of the state. With US, UK and other European countries keeping an eye on the security, the "people from behind the mountains" that now rules Israel can run the world as it sees fit, by proxy.

The hadith on the end of times chronology stated about these people where God commanded to Jesus to bring his followers to a mountain for shelter from these attacking people, stating that no man can destroy them but God. It can be derived that these people, who originally were cunning barbarians that were feared by almost all civilizations, and were blocked from the world by "He of Two Horns", have now evolved into a civilized, disciplined and intellectual bunch of murderers who will not be defeated until the right time. They have always been smart: in the past, knowing that they could not withstand the might of the Muslim army, they devised an ideological war, which led to in-fighting amongst Muslims.

The west today, still learns and studies any movements, organizations and even countries they decide as a "threat" to their survival. We have seen in the past how "regime changes" came about as "the unbound voice of democracy arises." Somewhere along the line, there's always the west poking their fingers in that particular mess. During the Cold War, the west via CIA tried to assassinate Fidel Castro by so many ways but failed, but they managed to execute President Salvador Allende of Chile, a popularly elected leader who is also a Marxist. Their proxy was General Augusto Pinochet, who was given support and sponsorship to launch a coup de tat against Allende's government. The army under Pinochet "suicided" Allende. This was all done to protect US business interest in Chile, and for this, the country suffered the next 25 years under the brutal regime of Augosto Pinochet, US' proxy.

Even the clergy-powered, hardcore Shiite Iran was not spared. President George W Bush (yes, the hollow drunk) approved more than US100 dollar to NGOs in Iran to support the opposition parties against President Ahmadinejad during the 2009 elections. Sure enough, the Iranian opposition suddenly became grand with riots exploding everywhere, but with the clergies in the driving seat and Ahmadinejad's victory, along with the Iranian parliament calling for the executions for the 2 opposition leaders who have been inciting the riots with sponsored cash, the riots died down. Bush failed in his attempt to overthrow the Iranian government. Bush faced impeachment, where among the listed crimes was Article 21of the Kucinich/Wexler impeachment articles: "the president misled Congress and the American people about threats from Iran, and supported terrorist organizations within Iran, with the goal of overthrowing the Iranian government."

Even the Popular Uprising in the Middle East is not excluded from their prying hands. The two greatest events that took place which captured the global community were the Tunisian Revolution that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (Zainal Abidin Bin Ali) of Tunisia and the Egyptian Uprising that finally ousted Hosni Mubarak. The political scenarios were already ripe for revolutions as both leaders of the country had been staunch US allies and supporters, while the majority of the people were not. In Tunisia, the suicide of 26 year old Mohamad Bouazizi by burning himself because his livelihood was confiscated by authorities became the starting point of the revolution. In Egypt, the murder of Khaled Mohamed Saeed by Egypt's secret police culminated into the downfall of President Hosni Mubarak. Basic human rights and fair elections also became the rallying cry in their uprising. Economic conditions were added to these in Libya and Syria.

The uprising took a strange turn in Egypt when Muslims and Coptics (The Egyptian Orthodox Christians) starting clashing over religious intolerance. This is one of the most bizarre points as the Muslims, for hundreds of years, have always respected the Coptics.

It is true that it was the conditions in each country by its respective leaders that led to the uprising, somewhere along the way, the west played their cards as well. Scores of sponsored NGOs and agents have been in those countries, such as National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Young Republicans and many more. For decades they have been seeding unrest by advocating western ideology, or maybe just pretending as humanitarian aid. Their tasks are not military, but more oratory and media-related. With the murder/suicide triggering their cue, hatred and hostility can easily be spread by tongue and received by the angry hearts of the people of the nation. With Mubarak and Ben Ali out, it goes to show that US never even bothered to help the very people they groomed and goes to show further that anybody chosen by the west is expendable.

The current Syrian unrest begs more question than ever. Over time, I have read how many Syrian soldiers and public left the army to join FSA (Free Syrian Army), and how smugglers had a hard job of supplying arms to them.. Their weapons are usually brand new and they are not from the Syrian army depot. Who is the actual group or individual sponsoring the weapons? What is more frightening is that the weapons seem to be more advanced compared to the army.

Will the new leaders of the countries be able to steer their people away from the turmoil? History denotes that each of those countries will face decades of unrest, or at least an uneasy peace. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq, despite the west placing their designed leader there, the fighting continues...just like what the west wanted. I wouldn't cheer for the new Islamist President of Egypt, Mohammed Mossi yet as I will need to read between the lines of whose alliance he is on and which direction he is taking.

These are the basic list of what they fought for in the Popular Uprising:
1) Basic human rights
2) Clean and fair elections
3) Economy

The west has indeed found the best and ultimate way to exercise regime change in countries they deem necessary, without military or any visible hand of theirs, by using the people of the nation. The days of sending snipers and sponsoring disgruntled generals of the army of that particular country may soon be over. What can be cleaner than instigating riots and violence that will oust the leader than by turning the citizens into puppets for their own play? We have seen how they butchered Gaddafi. Still, there are questions that remain unanswered:
a) How come people like Marcos and Ben Ali, among some, can never be extradited to their countries of origin?
b) Is it sheer coincidence that US-sponsored leaders like Hosni Mubarak and Soeharto were suddenly hit by stroke right after they were deposed?
c) How come leaders, who used to be US-allied, like Saddam Hussin were hastily tried and executed. Even the trial became more like a show to the world.

Never give the west an inch, or they'll take over your land. History taught us that, but it seems that even in Malaysia, after hundreds of years under colonization, anwar and pakatan seem to be opening up more space than needed in their lust for power.

In a true template to the west' design, anwar played the same card...although with different results. Along with dap, pkr and the dope among all, pas, they went around sowing seeds of disunity. Mind you, these "seeds of disunity" are the points that the west consider good enough to topple a country if exposed and strategically attacked.

The racial disunity card was played well by anwar and his pakatan. Institutions that help Malays and Bumiputras were condemned as corrupt and self-serving. They even attacked the New Economic Program as "a corrupt program that enriches only politicians."

Religious insensitivity was introduced by pakatan, spearheaded by DAP. Lim guan eng and the dyspeptic kapal sink were loud in making their anti-Islamic stand, followed suit by Bar Council. Worse, ambiga promoted the Inter-Faith Commission and along with pakatan, threw their weight in for the apostasy of Lina Joy.

Polis Diraja Malaysia received much of the brunt of the attack by pakatan. Painted as brutal, corrupt and government's dogs, pakatan even staged several dramas where they provoke police by attacking them, and once the police retaliate, they start taking pictures to be sold to the world. Unfortunately for anwar, he went to the same well one too many times. His stage plays have been recorded during the bersih riots. This is the usual effort to attack any country's public defense. I wonder why anwar never mentioned about the US police and National Guard bashing Occupy demonstrators in Minnesota a month or so ago.

 In another effort to further weaken the defenses of the nation, anwar attacked the army as well (click here for article) by claiming that the army is the hand that ensures Barisan's winning by ordering that all ballot papers must have Barisan Nasional checked beforehand. He also claimed that the army will always be ready to take over the country should ever Barisan lose the general election. This is necessary to create distrust between the public and the army and even among the army themselves. We should always remember, the police and the army played pivotal roles in securing the nation during the May 13th Riots.

Pakatan rakyat has been claiming of how bad the economy in Malaysia has been, with most GLCs facing disaster, i.e. Felda going bankrupt and that sort. But they were left with their mouth open and their cheeks slapped tight when Felda announced huge windfalls for Felda settlers. Even the settlers who have been severely critical of Felda had to force themselves to be unabashed to collect their cheques, while pakatan got bashed. Their red faces of embarrassment glowed so bright that one could swear that it was Chinese New Year.


Anwar and pakatan, along with ambiga and bar council staged the bersih rallies, sponsored by NED via George Soros. By strategic planning of the NGO, and paid spectators, bersih became the ugliest event in the country, causing millions of RM in damages. This move did confuse many, even in the west. With pakatan winning 5 states in the 2008 General Elections, why is anwar claiming that the election was dirty and corrupt? If BN keeps winning all the time with more than 90% majority (like in the case of Ben Ali), it would've been a different question altogether. On the other hand, the bersih rally was a blessing to Malaysians: they get to see how pakatan degraded themselves to be terrorists and became pawns of the west. In return, the final bersih rally threw dirt into anwar and pakatan's face when they had to deal with so much anger from the public. I must say that, despite getting Malaysians to be angry, anwar and pakatan got them on the wrong side of the scale.

Let's see now, anwar and his pakatan rakyat have followed the recipe given by the west and spent the sponsorship freely, but what went wrong? Why are they still the opposition? Why isn't anwar the President of the Republic of Malaysia yet? Didn't the west studied Malaysia's fragile points already and taught anwar properly on how to strategically destroy them? In fact, Malaysia has always been a strong opposition to Israel and has always been vocal about it, shouldn't the west want that threat neutralized?

Maybe anwar should wonder to himself, is the west serious in their attempts to place him as the leader of this nation? Have they forsaken him because he spoke against Israel on the Freedom Flotilla issue? Or because he keeps mucking up by having more and more of his tight secrets being revealed by his once-loyal-supporters and Ummi Hafilda? The latest revelation on his a few billions of RM in his accounts is making him more popular in the wrong way. His support for Israel's security, while it puts a smile on the west, made him enemies of the Muslims and his reputation with Hamas is questionable...although it has always been questionable in the first place. The lack of attendants to his ceramahs is beginning to show how much liability he is to pakatan and to the west. With more videos slated to be released on anwar's slam-bang-thank you-ma'am by his once loyal close aides, the west might have to rethink of their strategies.

History has shown how the west chose less-than-clean individuals to be the replacement leader of certain nations, as they always need skeletons in the closet for controlling factorbut it is not supposed to be that obvious. Even anwar's face demonstrates the diminishing luster and aura. Is the west dumping him? Even if they do, the damage has been done, and it will take time to repair them. Pas might have to look deep into their hearts; their reputation (if any) has been annihilated by their participation with anwar in pakatan. The mega-pig farm, Madrasah Salihiah waqf land, pubs and nite-clubs in Kedah, their support for Lina Joy's apostasy, their non-action on the use of "Allah" by other religions, their shameful act of turning Unit Amal into terrorists and their ever loyal support for a man who supports Israel and supported by Jews despite their so-called Islamic stand, these have so much eroded Muslims' trust in pas. Having anwar, pkr and dap turning their backs on the Muslims and Malays is a grave injury, but with pas joining them to do the same made it fatal.


I don't think the west really cares what happens to anwar after this; the Neo-cons have lost their power base under Obama. To the jews, Malaysia is not located anywhere on the land which they claim is God's promise to Abraham: from the banks of the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. To the one eyed, anwar is just a speck of dust of one wannabe leader whose worth is 5 sen a dozen.

While the Muslims and Malays fight one another in Malaysia, guess who's laughing at the dap hq. Oh yes, by the way, with all of the Muslim countries fighting amongst themselves, including us, guess who's laughing in the conquered land of Bayt-ul Maqdis?

...And Pas Has Never Been Islamic; But We Always Know That

There are times when people can actually read the writing on the wall. Anwar, I guess, has gotten at least a clue about it with almost empty halls, and more people watching Euro rather than his ceramahs. What makes it worse for him is that Euro starts around midnight while his ceramah is around 9:00p.m. Maybe that's why there is more participation from his allies from and via an island state in the south.

What about the deluded party who claim themselves as Islamic? Do they even realize the road that they took? Or even the consequences of selling their souls to the devil?

We can blame the west for making sure that no ethnic group in any of their colonies can ever unite. Against the united Indians under Gandhi, they made sure religion splits them into India and Pakistan. Then again, maybe we should be grateful to them as well for not giving the same treatment that they did to the Native Americans, Aborogines or even Hawaiians where they chose to "exterminate the brutes." Malaysia was not spared when pas was introduced to ensure a rift among Malays.

The damage was done, pas became a political party that uses Islam only for the sake of winning votes. All the years then saw how they degraded the teachings of Islam and turn their backs on Muslims. With n.ajis and Haji hadi at the helm, they steered the ship into one of the biggest deviation of Islam Malaysia has ever seen.

There was a time when n.ajis instructed that government buildings should not display the picture of the Prime Minister of Malaysia (then Tun Mahathir), reasoning that it lead people to acts of glorification and led astray from the Islamic teachings. But he sure didn't say a word about his pictures being hung up in Kelantan government offices, along with his picture on badges being sold at pas-owned shops. Even today, and during the disastrous Hijau Ke Putrajaya rally in Kedah, one can see the n.ajis factions in pas wearing the badge.

What about n.ajis' saying that it is allowed to swear, curse and use profanities in Islam? Or even saying the same about cooperating with the devil? Or even using money from the jews in order to create chaos and split among the ummah and threaten the safety of a nation?

Perhaps one of the biggest deviations ever by pas is the Amanat Haji Hadi, where in one swoop, pas condemns UMNO as heretics for working hand in hand with MCA and MIC and other components who are not of the Islamic faith. It is a wonder how Malays who had less than 20 cents of knowledge of the holy book can never figure out that hadi edited and chopped the verses of the Qur'an, and most of it, twisted the meanings to his own liking to suit his political agenda. One of the results of this is the rifts created where one mosque with 2 Imams as one of the Imams was considered un-Islamic because he was not from pas.

The biggest error in jedgement by pas must be the support and loyalty they pledged to anwar in his and their lust to be in power, which undid most of the things they have stood for. They even supported the chauvenistic and anti-Islamic DAP and the Bar Council as well. I guess, for pas, as long as it will take them to power, Islam can be stepped on and  kicked out. Of course, in doing so, pas contradicted themselves and hadi's amanat. Now they claim that it is acceptable to join hands with the staunchly anti-Islamic dap but it is still heretical for UMNO to work with MCA and MIC. Now, I still can't find anywhere in Islamic teachings that allows anybody to practice double-standard.

Where can pas put their faces in shame when anwar supported the security of the illegal state of Israel? Even Hamas denies anwar's stand. All the years of putting on great shows against US and Israel became undone when they choose to stick to anwar with such loyalty. Of course, as pas has mentioned, their stand differs from anwar. This is odd, if anwar becomes the President and supports Israel, will pas walk out on him? Perhaps RM20b will discourage them from doing so. Why did pas suddenly lose their balls to stand up for Islam when anwar supported Lina Joy's apostasy? I see, this will be a great nation when anwar becomes President and his strongest allies have different stands.

What is the big fuss that we have to face when pas, along with pkr and dap protest against the building of a religious school (Sekolah Agamka Rakyat) in Gopeng? Consider that a parallelity and in comparison to what's happening in Kedah, where pas decides to get rid of a historic Madrasah and use the waqf land to build a shopping center. None of pas members were present when Muslims demonstrated against the taking of the waqf land. When the parents of the SAR students demonstrated, pas turned their back to them. Worse still, pas mooned them by collaborating with Lee Boon Chye in proposing the destruction of the school.

The Qur'an is right when it said that those group of people who were locked behind a great mountain range always created mischief on Earth. Muslims against Muslims in the Middle East and Asia, Malays against Malays here...and they get to keep Baytul Maqdis and ensure no outside interference when it comes to eradicating Palestinians. One thing for sure, with pas proclaiming itself as "the most Islamic" in Malaysia, they damaged the religion more. They don't seem to care about Islam and the ummah though, all that matters is power. I guess the west succeeded in making them into one-eyed minds. M.ajis' once stated that it is okay in Islam to humiliate other leaders or individuals but went berserk when Tun Mahathir lambasted him silly in his popular blog. That, although a small example, is enough to show the dementia caused by the one-eyed minds of pas. They have now come to a point where they do not care about any criticisms made about them by religious figures of the world.

Anwar, I must say, is smart. By making pas legitimize or branding his actions as "halal", he managed to degrade pas. And knowing pas' arrogance and forever in denial-attitude, anwar used pas to his own benefit, such as turning the unit amal into a bunch of amateur terrorists to be used during bersih 3.0. Worse still, the stupid unit amal pas wore their silly uniforms and attacked the police instead of wearing normal shirts. Though they try to pin the blame on the police, many parts of the world, via alternative media, has seen the aggression made by the unit amal. Anwar, who disappeared early, got off scott-free. Pas joining pakatan for the sake of power and glory is the ultimate betrayal to the Muslims and Malays in Malaysia. They are now nothing but stooges for anwar and his one-eyed allies.

There was a time when Najib apoligized to Malaysia, on behalf of UMNO and Barisan Nasional for the wrongs done in the past...most of all, maybe during pak lah's time. Will Muslims ever see pas apologizing for all the deviations they committed on the ummah? Well, wouldn't it be surprising? Pas has never been Islamic, but we always know that.

The Hijaukan Putrajaya Garbage In Kedah...And I Really Mean, Garbage

Another day has passed, and much to the delight of Alor Setar residents, the troublesome event known as Hijaukan Putrajaya is over. With today being a holiday, azizan and pas Kedah can be thankful that the event is not held today, or they might just see a revolt bigger than bersih can ever hold and even their terrorists who used to be known as Unit Amal might just leave their balls behind.


We understand that pas is currently patting themselves in the back as they see it as a success. The pas Kedah, on the other hand, has a very daunting mystery to solve, on the absence of Kedahans during the events.But I don't think the Kedah pas leaders really care: azizan is leaving, and the MB wannabes like mahfuz, amiruddin and phahrolrazi are too busy lobbying with the central leaders.

A success to pas? What about for the residents of Alor Setar? There were so much anger created by the event, especially from people who lives within the radius of the stadium. As can be seen in the map, the area marked by the yellow/orange box/circle fared the worst, with vehicles coming from all around Malaysia blocking their entrances. There were many who were blocked from going for their Friday prayers, and there was also a family who were blocked from going off for their holiday. The unit amal twits who were directing traffic didn't even bother to let the drivers know that they were blocking the neighborhood from doing their daily affairs. I was also informed that things almost got ugly in Jalan Tengku Abdul Halim when a participant became angry when a house-owner requested that he park his car somewhere else and not block his house entrance. Luckily the driver moved away when the neighbors came out. Even the unit amal tried to defend the dtiver in blocking the entrance. Well, what do you expect when terrorists control the roads?

There were some residents who questioned the unit amal chaps who seem to be directing people to park directly in front of their gates. I must say that the majority of the people in this area are pensioners who spends their time with their family and grandchildren and doing more ibadah, and the pas supporters might just be too stupid to think about other people...but then again, if they do, they will actually be preaching on Islam, isn't it? The areas in the blue box were affected, although not too bad compared to the other. Most people in Alor Setar had to divert to a longer route in going to places like banks, mosques, kenduris and even hypermarkets. Many were irritated, but there's nothing much they can do because it is their state government who planned it so badly.

Still on the matter of Kedahans being absence from the event, the out-of-state-pas supporters left Kedahans a palpable gift. I took these pictures aroound 4.30pm, and despite the E-Idaman workers cleaning the area since morning, you can still see the gifts lying around, all around the stadium. Curiously, there were pages upon pages of Harakahkahkah lying scattered on the ground. I remember those days when pas used to treat the tabloid as part of their holy of the holies. I guess now pas treats harakah as what we have always known: garbage. We know that E-Idaman has always been slow to pick up garbage from our houses, looks like now we have to wait some more as the litter around the stadium still needs to be cleared.

Wait, with all those crap left by pas (physically, not the program), shall we tell anwar to send his jewish-sponsored bersih team and clean it up? Hey, at least they'll be doing an actual Bersih job compared tothe acts of terrorism they did in KL. It's not that I really want to make this wordplay but, what's the point of "greening" Putrajaya when leave so much pollution, both socially and physically in Kedah?

Kedahans generally are very reasonable and literally quite liberal, as one old man I met at Jalan Mahkota said, "Nak buat apa pon, kalau tak kacau oghang takpa la, ni sampai pi masjid, nak pi kendughi, nak pi tengok anak cucu pon tak boleh, bangsa agama apa depa ni?" ("We don't care what you want to do, as long as it does not disturn people, but barring people from going to the mosque, kenduris and visiting our children and grandchildren, what sort of religion do these people profess?). I overheard One furious old Chinese man was venting his anger at the coffeeshop: he lives off Jalan Stadium on the road that goes to Jabatan Pendidikan Kedah, and he was blocked as well. He was only able to go out after 10:00p.m., and he was heard saying this: "Itu stadium baru kat Suka Menanti ada, lagi banyak tempat, itu kompleks Gunung Keriang ada, sana itu Dewan Wawasan (Jitra) pun ada, lagi mau buat ini tempat. Bagi semua orang susah. Banyak bodo punya orang" (You have the new stadium at Suka Menanti, with bigger area, you have the complex in Gunung Keriang, there's Dewan Wawasan (Jitra) over there, but they still want to do it here. Making people's life difficult. Idiots."

I do understand the anger, but try to look at it from pas' perspective: with Kedah slipping out from their grasp. with problems from logging, ignored infrastructure to the Waqf land issue, pas needed a show of force, and it was really a show manufactured to fool people. I guess pas tried to show that they are strong in Kedah, but in the end, pas was angered by the absence of Kedahans and in return, Kedahans, especially Alor Setar residents, were angered by pas' disregard to Kedahans' daily affairs and religious obligations. Kedahans has now really seen what pas has always been: un-Islamic and self-centered.

The One-Eyed Factor Behind Anwar - Saying What Has Been Said

There were times over and over again when we tried to inform people of these shadowy movements lurking behind anwar ibrahim and his so-called reformasi movement, but for that, we were branded as madmen, doom-sayers, lunatics and list goes on and on.

Today, by the grace of God, Malaysians have finally seen or at least, sensed the existence of this unsavoury existence of the one-eyed element manifesting within anwar's actions.

On the shadowy elements behind anwar and his so-called movements, check out the article below:

The foreign factor on April 28
By M. VEERA PANDIYAN, The Star, 10 May 12

Bersih’s peaceful supporters have the right to know the nexus between the ‘free and fair’ polls movement, the Pakatan Rakyat leader and foreign financial and political backers.

SOMETIMES, knowing too many people can be painful, especially when they try to draw you into political discussions in the most unlikely of places.

As a rule, I have always refrained from talking politics in restaurants or pubs but these days, it’s become a guideline that’s hard to keep.

It appears that, recently, almost everyone has become an expert on politics – even those who had never bothered to vote before, despite being in their 40s and 50s.

The problem with these new political pundits is that they want to convert you to their side and refuse to listen to alternate viewpoints.

There is no doubt that the April 28 Bersih 3.0 protest has created more such people besides widening the gap between supporters of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

The rally, the biggest that the country has seen so far, is also significant because most of those who turned up did so in peace, seeking free and fair elections.

Understandably, this group is upset that Opposition politicians hijacked the rally which turned ugly in the end.

A new website – www.dearambiga.com – says in its introduction: “We are angry. Why?

Because Bersih should be an NGO by the people, for the people of all races, areas and political views.

“But in Bersih 3.0, some Pakatan Rakyat bosses took advantage of our noble cause for their own political interests and benefit!”

The website has a clip of a heated exchange between independent filmmaker Benji Lim and Pakatan Rakyat’s Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over the hijacking of the rally.

It also has a petition titled “Time to stop Pakatan Rakyat hijacking our movement”, and urges visitors to e-mail Ambiga on the issue.

Perhaps, the peaceful people and those behind the website should take a closer look at allegations that bigger forces are behind the movement.

Tony Cartalucci of the Land Destroyer Report website, for example, says that Bersih’s leadership is being supported financially and politically by foreign organisations.

He cited a Malaysian Insider report on June 27, 2011 in which the Bersih leader admitted receiving money from two US organisations – the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) – for projects which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 Bersih 2.0 march.

However, he wrote that the NDI website revealed that funding and training had indeed been provided before the organisation removed the information and replaced it with a more benign version, purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.

He said the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to the movement suggested “something more sinister at play”.

“That Anwar himself was Chair-man of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined NED’s Democracy Award and a panelist at an NED donation ceremony – the very same organisation whose subsidiaries are funding and supporting Bersih – casts irrefutable doubt on their official agenda for clean and fair elections,” he wrote.

As such, Cartalucci said claims by Bersih supporters that Anwar had hijacked their movement rang hollow when looking at both his and Bersih’s entwined foreign financial and political backers.

He said with Bersih leaders’ recipients of aid from NED and OSI, and Anwar being a functionary of the IMF, it was certain that no matter how genuine Bersih’s rank and file might be, the fruits of their efforts would be the destabilisation and neo-recolonisation of a country that had fought long and hard to work its way out from Western imperialism.

If indeed the movement is about civil society’s rights to free and fair elections, Malaysians deserve to know more about these links.

But I doubt if people would rush to check the veracity of such reports or demand an explanation.

Blame it on what psychologists call “confirmation bias”. It is the propensity to look for what confirms one’s beliefs and ignore what contradicts them. It’s more pronounced when it comes to politics.

> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this quote by English philosopher William Penn: Passion is the mob of the man, that commits a riot upon his reason.

Was it all necessary in the first place? For anwar, it seems that the politics of anger is about to devour him alive. People were angry with the government back in 2008 during the nitwit and son-in-law's reign. Najib's diplomacy and radical transformations seemed to be in favor of Malaysians on the whole, much to anwar's ire. With much to gain from the programs and policies, anger has been long discarded and this put anwar's dream in jeopardy. For pakatan to keep their dreams of winning alive, they need people to remain angry. Spin and spin, lies after lies but nothing seem to work, and they had banked a lot on the bersih program.

Bersih 3.0 was supposed to be viral, or at least on paper, which was supposed to lead to a major revolt, overthrowing the government and implementing a regime change to which anwar would benefit, and it all started with a few simple instructions to his refreshing dessert, azmin ali just be fore anwar disappeared from view totally. It was the beginning of the biggest flop ever, and like the movie Heaven's Gate, it was hugely budgeted, massively constructed but tanked dismally. Anwar still wakes up every morning, asking himself, "Why am I still not a President?" The anger most Malaysians have now is with anwar and his pakatan for the massive destruction they had caused to the taxpayers.

Will his sponsors now commit to a bigger and more unscrupulous, more massive scaled riot called Bersih 4? Rumours has it that the next bersih riot will be held during the general election, with riots to be conducted if Pakatan loses. Will that happen? With the huge budgets they have distributed and failure after failure that were returned, would those NGOs dare to sponsor a regime change on behest of one chap who's lusting for power?

HRH YDP Agong Officially Installed...and Kedahans Celebrate ABAI Too

It is official; Almu'tasimu Billahi Muhibbuddin Tuanku Alhaj Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah Ibni Almarhum Sultan Badlishah has been officially installed as the 14th DYMM Seri Paduka Baginda Yang Dipertuan Agong in a lavish ceremony filled with Malay traditions. As a Kedahan, we are proud to have the 27th Sultan of Kedah to reign again as the DYMM YDP Agong. He was the 5th Agong who reigned from 1970-1975. Kedah has again created history: it produced 2 Prime Ministers, one who achieved Malaya's independence and the other who brought major development to the country. Now, history notes that, for the first time, the same Sultan of Kedah is elected to the throne of YDP Agong twice in his lifetime, an achievement never attained before.

Many even noted another point of history made, where during Tuanku Abdul Halim's first reign, the Prime Minister was Tun Abdul Razak and during his second, Tun Razak's son, the Prime Minister is Datuk Seri Mohd Najib bin Abdul Razak. God is great, his wonders abound and we pray that God will grant Malaysia the peace and prosperity it deserves.

The ceremony was colorful, steeped in tradition and splendour. Of course, there were reports of several opposition MPs making quite a ruckus, poking fun at dignitaries and royalties. Funny how foreign dignitaries can be very polite and dignified while Malaysia's own opposition politicians can act like some diabolical cows. But what can we expect from the sponsored pakatan? PKR is only concerned with Israel's well being, they don't care about Malaysia. The socialist dap...well, there's no need to comment further. I guess Phahrolrazi was a bit more dignified, well, of course he has to be. If anwar's plan to oust azizan goes through, he will have to get in the Agong and Sultan Kedah's good books.

While Kedahans celebrate the installation of their monarch as the new King of Malaysia, they have also been celebrating the arrival of a movement that has been going strong: A.B.A.I. or Asal Bukan Anwar Ibrahim. You can find posters of ABAI appearing almost everywhere, even in pas' stronghold areas. You can even see one at the TNB sub-station at the airport in Kepala Batas. Yes, it's not new, Kedahans just simply hate anwar ibrahim.

Maybe anwar shouldn't have supported Israel. He should've realized that he is not supporting the same Israel owned by the semitic Insraelites which were mentioned by the Al-Qur'an. He is supporting a non-semitic secular state created by the descendents of the tribe who were walled-up behind a barrier between 2 great range.

Anwar might not be surprised with pas' very own support for ABAI in Kedah. After all, anwar did, and is still, trying to oust the ulama faction in pas from the party. In fact, Kedahans are not even surprised with pas' ulama faction giving its full and yet hidden support to get rid of the israel-supporting and foreign-ngo-sponsored anwar. Many in pas Kedah can never forgive anwar and his cohorts for trying to derail azizan.

At the moment, anwar has been reported to be very disturbed by the movement, yet seems calm like a rabbi on a saturday. Not surprising, he has been taught well by organizations such as NED and NDI (who brought us turmoils in Middle East and death of Gaddafi) to act calm, but everybody can see from his face how dark and stormy his mind is. For anwar's wannabe leaders of Kedah, anwar's seemingly indifference to the ABAI movement is not giving them sweet dreams. Mahfuz and even phahrolrazi are worried that the ulama faction will oust them in the next general election via ABAI, which will destroy any chances for any of them to be the next MB. Even mat sapu, who can be seen hopping on and off Firefly Airlines to Kedah scouting for suitable areas to contest might find this disturbing. For a wife-grabbers like him who has been rejected by Kelantan, he will face an uphill battle to convince the many ulama faction of pas Kedah on why he should contest in Kedah. We would strongly suggest him to contest in Penang, but then again, with his bleak history and dark secrets at that he might try to hide, may we suggest Johor then?

Of course, there's also Johari Abdul, PKR MP of Sungai Petani. Then again, he is lost cause, with his penchant of self destruction and inability to utter a single word of truth, I think he goes down even without ABAI.

Maybe anwar shouldn't have been so high-handed in getting rid of the ulama faction of pas. Hassan Ali's ceramah in Sungai Petani was attended by...well, there were more people there compared to those who attended the pakatan rakyat convention in Kedah a few months ago. I would've compared it to Nasir Mustafa's (Kubang Rotan - PAS) ceramah in Langkawi, but I don't want people to injure themselves laughing. The ulama faction is still smarting from Hassan Ali's expulsion from his position.

Even anwar's attempt at painting a bad image of a Kedahan businessman, Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary via his beautified daughter, Nurul Izzah, backfired when more Kedahans loathing anwar and his family more than ever...while Gardenia is always sold out in most parts of Kedah. Without Syed Mokhtar's double tracking project and the Durian Burung project made pas Kedah look as if they are busy in the development of Kedah, even when pas is actually sleeping on the job. The pas state government of Kedah has, in the past 3 years, been warming up to Syed Mokhtar, and nurul izzah's statement might just give them a black eye and a backlash.

With ABAI gaining momentum in Kedah, embraced by so many, anwar is left with a weak piping time of peace. He will now have to orchestrate a tight control on his visits to Kedah to avoid any embarrassing moment. I guess, even while watching the installation of the new King, he was wondering why he is not on the throne yet. In fact, I can guess that he's wondering where is the regime change that he has ordered for Malaysia, and where are the jewish-sponsored NGOs? Maybe they're busy campaigning ABAI as well.

A Friend of My Friend (Anwar) Is Our Friend...Or Do We See The Dark Of The Moon?

I have indeed missed a week or two of events in Malaysia due to my travels. Upon return and updating myself, a few reports caught my attention.

Pas' spiritual advisor was quoted as saying, that Islam does allow its followers to work together and/or have business relations as long as they have no bad or evil agenda behind it. (For complete article of this, please click here ) With certain rarity, I am bound to agree with this statement in general.

From the Holy Al-Qur'an, Hadith and history, we mostly distinguish the Jews as the Israelites, from the same Semitic line as the Arabs. By the time Muhammad S.A.W. began his mission in Mecca, there were several groups of "Arab Jews" in the Arabian Peninsular. Despite the majority being descendents of Israelites, there were a smattering of them comprising of Arabs who converted to Judaism before Islam. Most of these Arab Jews came to be there:

 * after the collapse of Kingdom of Judah in 586 BCE,
 * after the Roman conquest of Judea and the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 CE, exiles found a home in the desert,
 * being survivors of the Bar Kochba Revolt, in 135CE, who sought religious freedom in the Arabian desert rather than live under oppression by the Romans,
 * immigration, around 300 CE, by people who are known in Islamic literature as the Banu Aus and the Banu Khazraj who fled the Ghassanids in Syria.
 * migration from Judea into southern Arabian Peninsula to ride the ascent of the Himyarite Kingdom around 380 CE.

Other descendents of Israelites made their homes in other Arabic countries and even in north Africa. Their expulsions, again and again from Jerusalem or Bait-ul-Maqdis were the result of their arrogance and their intolerable attitude and disregard towards God and their blatant persecution of the Prophets appointed by God. This was made clear in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own);
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95)

There were conflicts before between the Jews of Mecca/Medina during Muhammad's prophethood. Bani Qaynuqa, for example, were expelled from Medina by Muhammad S.A.W. for breaking the treaty today known as The Constitution of Medina. Despite their early indifferent towards the Muslim world, for more than 1,000 years, Muslims have done business and even lived side-by-side with the Jews. In the past, we have even seen a few Jews involved in the administration or governance of Islamic countries in the Middle East and North Africa. When the Christians captured Jerusalem during the First Crusades in 1099, they went on a bloody rampage, where thousand of Muslims and Jews were massacred as the Christians have no idea how to distinguish between the two. The Jews who fled knew that as long as they stick with the Muslims, they will be safe.

With the collapse of Spanish Muslims Cordoba Caliphate , the Spaniards introduced the Spanish Inquisition in 1480 that saw thousands of Muslims and Jews in Spain tortured to death in order to force them to convert. Again, the Jews fled with the Muslims, mostlt to Turkey and other Islamic countries. Among the favorite methods used by the Inquisitors to detect the Muslims was serving pork at banquets as both Muslims and Jews are forbidden to eat them.

Today, these descendents of Israelites comprise only 20% or less of the population in the modern state of Israel. So, who are the biggest jewish population of Israel?

History notes a bizarre twist in the Israelites' fate and a decline in their fortunes. The Israelites' Kingdom in Jerusalem were destroyed by the combined forces of Babylonian and Scythian army under Nebuchadnezzar in 597BC. The Scythians did most of the destruction, leaving behind a completely destroyed nation, almost wiping its trace from the world.

The Scythians were a powerful group, originating from the northern part of the world, behind a great mountain range of the north, the Caucasus. They were very destructive in nature and caused a lot of death, misery and damage wherever they attack and pillage. Their only way in and out of their homeland is a pass between the two mountainous range. Manybiblical prophets wrote in their testaments of these people, one even referring them as "a boiling cauldron from the north." Scythians can trace their line back to Noah through Japeth or Yafet bin Noh.

Israelites were captured and brought to Babylon where the Israelites spent the next 57 years as slaves. When a just king, Dhul Qarnain (Dzulqarnain) conquered Babylon in 540BC, he proclaimed the freedom for Israelites whereby returning them to Jerusalem where they remained until they were expelled again by the Romans in 70CE.

The rampage and destruction brought on by the Scythians drummed fear into almost every civilization in the then-known world. Some Islamic scholars believe that it was the Georgians who met and implored help from the just king, Dhul Qarnain to stop these barbarians, despite not being part of his empire. The just king constructed a dam-like wall of iron and copper that cuts off the pass between the two range which disallowed the Scythians from going in or out to the then-known civilization.

They said, "O Dhul-Qarnayn, indeed Gog and Magog are [great] corrupters in the land. So may we assign for you an expenditure that you might make between us and them a barrier?" He said, "That in which my Lord has established me is better [than what you offer], but assist me with strength; I will make between you and them a dam. Bring me sheets of iron" - until, when he had leveled [them] between the two mountain walls, he said, "Blow [with bellows]," until when he had made it [like] fire, he said, "Bring me, that I may pour over it molten copper." So Gog and Magog were unable to pass over it, nor were they able [to effect] in it any penetration.

[Dhul-Qarnayn] said, "This is a mercy from my Lord; but when the promise of my Lord comes, He will make it level, and ever is the promise of my Lord true." And We will leave them that day surging over each other, and [then] the Horn will be blown, and We will assemble them in [one] assembly.
Surah Al-Kahfi 94-99

As time passes, the Scythians evolved and cultured themselves, officially embracing Judaism in the 8th century. Their kingdom was known as Khazaria. The attacks by the Russians drove the Khazars away into Europe where they blend in with the population, "surging over each other. Yes, I agree with some of the Islamic scholars that the iron and copper wall is no more. Is there any surprise that most white people are known as Caucasians? Despite the Jews flooding into eastern europe, the German Jews became quite dominant, especially the Ashkenazi Jews. Yiddish, which is a high german language of the German Jews, written in Hebrew alphabets became the almost official language of the non-Semitic European or Caucasian Jews.

The Caucasian jews replicated the Israelite jews so much, to a point of perfection, up to a point that they feel that they are Israelites and the land prmosed to Abraham's children is theirs, and theirs alone. The land stretches from the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. They were almost solely responsible for introducing usury-based systems in banking and insurance to Europe where it flourished. Migrations to the new world (USA) gave them more opportunities to control significant elements that will influence and shape the future, such as mass-media and the entertainment industry. The caucasian jews-controlled media manipulated the term Semitic to include them, and exclude the Arabs. Movie studios, controlled by these jews churned out movies which in the long run, plays into their favor, amplifying their manufactured wars on the plight of the Jews in Europe to gain sympathy. They loaned billions of dollars for US to fight the war, and in return, the British Mandate of Palestine fell into their hands.

Caucasian jews were already accumulating in areas surrounding Jerusalem in the late 19th century. Is it strange to see how jewish terrorists and all the jewish heroes of Israel in Palestine of the past were comprised of non-semitic jews? Moshe Dayan was a Ukrainian Jew, and none of the Prime Ministers of Israel are Israelites. Even the founder of Zionism is non-Semitic. The very organized Jewish Mafia of Israel comprise of non-semitic jews as well.

Let's understand a few basic elements here:
1) Not all Israelites are Jews, some have converted to other religion such as Islam and Christians throughout time
2) Not all jews are Israelites (semitic), the Caucasian (Russian/European) Jews are descended from Japhet Bin Noh.
3) Not all Caucasians are Jews
4) Not all Jews are Zionists; there are many Jews (both Semitic & Non-Semitic) who are against the killing of Palestinians and there are also Jews who feels that there SHOULDN'T even be a state of Israel.
5) Not all Zionists are Jews; many Christians are Zionists as well, such as Al Gore, Joe Biden and Madeleine Albright (despite her background of being Czech-jewish parentage, she is a Roman Catholic)
6) Lastly, a very well known but less spread information : Being an anti-jew is never anti-semitic. To be anti-semitic means that one has hatred and against the children of Sem bin Noh, namely 2 ethnics (brethrens): Arabs and Israelites

By a strange twist, or perhaps, irony, the tribe that destroyed the Kingdom of Israel and Judah became the saviour for the Israelite descendants. The Caucasian Jews brought the Israelites back to Jerusalem, fulfilling the prophecy stated in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own); until Gog and Magog are let through (their barrier), and they swiftly spread out in every direction (replicating themselves amongst all the peoples of the world).”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95-96)

The requirements were completed. The Israelites were returned to Bait-ul-Maqdis by the already-blended Caucasian Jews who were freed from the iron-copper wall. The end of times are here, the countdown has been on even when Muhammad S.A.W. was appointed as the final Prophet by God. We are currently living in a Pax America world, but we can already smell the coming of Pax Judaica, a world run by the the children of Scythians for their one-eyed master, ruling from Jerusalem.

After all of these long walks into history, let's go back to nik aziz' statement. His statement seems to be double edged, and I am not absolutely sure who it is really meant to. If he was supporting Haji Hadi when the latter stated that it is okay to deal with Jews, it certainly is a selfish one, as pas usually is. I don't want to bring up the Israeli cricket team issue of the 1990s anymore as other blogs have dealt with it. However, I would like to see nik aziz stating this to anwar ibrahim over his choice of friends and allies. Why does anwar chose to ally with people like Paul Wofowitz, a Polish Jew, also a neo-con who master-minded the attack on Iraq? He is a strong supporter of the Zionists and associated with the think-tank known as Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). He is responsible for the attack on Iraq.

Another good friend of Anwar and pakatan is Madeleine Albright, a daughter of Czech-Jewish parents who converted to Roman Catholic when Hitler invaded the country. Long considered as a "close friend of Zionists", she was quoted on 60 Minutes, on 12 May 1996, in reference to genocidal sanctions against Iraq,

Questio: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

Madeleine Albright responded, "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it."

Anwar's other friends include Joe Esposito, Michael Camdessus and many more who are long associated with the close relationship to Zionists. Also included are his association with National Endowment for Democracy, Council for Foreign Relations, Accountability, Foundation for the Future and Open Society which receive funds from the same piggy bank that donates billions to the Zionists. These are not the zionists who has no evil agenda behind them.

Nik aziz and pas, along with the Muslims in pkr, must ask themselves, "Is the friend of my beloved leader is our friend?" Or has the moon darken itself in pas? Talk to anwar then, does pas really want to be another so-called Islamic party that is run by and bows down to Zionists? At least, if nik aziz stands his ground, he can finally carry out his responsibilities as a caring Muslim for once. Are anwar's allies the friends that we Malaysians need? Or should we understand more on what Surah Al-Rum is trying to tell us?

Nik aziz's statement is like a blanket too short, it covered Hadi, yet it uncovered anwar's butt, opening it to slaps and pokes.