Sacrificing The Nation's Independence For A Few Dollars More

So what's the big deal about anwar and his pakatan coming up with a new flag to replace the Malaysian Jalur Gemilang, a new constitution and even a new national anthem? They are, after all, proponents of the politics of hate...well, maybe that's why Malaysians hate them. It's too easy for them to device all of these...in short, they did not come up with those, their sponsors did.

We do understand why pakatan want to do so in many levels. I mean, why would pakatan want to follow something that has been established by the forefathers of independence? Yes, it was the Perikatan (precursor to Barisan Nasional) who were responsible for the creation of the flag, national anthem and constitution, and pakatan can never stay quiet with that fact. They would want something that "they" alone created...well, maybe something to appease their paymasters as well.

Of course, at the moment, their excuse will be that everything was made by the British...still, it is much better than having them made by pakatan's sponsors who Malaysians will have to bow to and sacrifice their freedom once they are in control.

For years, we have seen anwar asking for funds from various countries and organizations. There has to be reasons why he was begging for forgiveness from them over the Freedom Flotilla incident in US. We have seen how Singapore officials, during by-elections travelling with Pakatan bigwigs and even participate in the jewish-sponsored bersih 3. They have to be there, they need to look after their investments. Is it surprising to see that the so-called "new flag" resembles Singaporean flag? Or do we still wonder why the racist DAP's logo still resemble their master, PAP of Singapore's logo? Maybe we can finally figure who actually designed the flag? Who never knew that Singapore is the South East Asia base for CIA (and other organizations linked to the one eyed)?

On a very rare occasion, I was corresponding with the Editor of Mathaba.net, an alternative news media organization about a month ago. The organization was previously set up by Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. Today, I have no idea who they are under but they still write scathing attacks on Malaysia. Previously, they republished an article by Harakah, attacking Tun Mahathir (click here for article)over his remarks on anwar. At that point, I feel that it was hypocrisy on their part as their views on anwar ibrahim is such:

By email
From: Mathaba DotNet  
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:54 AM

...As to the opposition. Just today I had a long conversation with one of Malaysia's top lawyers, and I must say, one of the best men in the world, from a personal and character point of view. I'm proud to say that his views and my own, regarding the opposition and situation in Malaysia, concur almost 100%. Even on this analysis of the sword incident.

Basically, let me explain a little. Anwar Ibrahim, and the NGO that is chasing the submarine issue etc, these have immense advantages over the government or indeed any other party. Do you think AI needs to think or make policies or decisions? No. He has an army of psychologists, propagandists, financiers, all behind him, all in America or wherever, sending him daily reports and funds, what to say, what to attack. His job is easy. It's smooth.

Strange, that's not the first journalist I read or heard of something like that, yet their publications support anwar in total. I guess even they had to obey their paymasters.

What is the strength of these funding? For most Malaysians, being Muslims and aware of the western oppression on Islam is good enough to make all to be careful of these western agendas. In theory, perhaps, but in reality, the funds have made its rounds and we can see how individuals change:

1) The so-called Bersih demonstrations have demonstrated how money, even a little, changes people. Pakatan brought in and paid rioters to run riot and destruction in a location, and at the same time, use them as news for the western media if ever the police take action. Of course, they were also paid to provoke the police into retaliating. It's a good strategy by NED and Open Society to fund this event to make it look as if Malaysia is under oppression.

2) This young man (as pictured) was paid to show his buttocks onto a picture of leaders, a symbol of expressing his dissatisfaction. He was also proud to show his buttocks to the public, which only goes to show the morality of himself. I am sure his parents taught him better. But he doesn't care, he is being paid with funds from other organizations of the one-eyed. Not to mention, those people who spent time stepping on the country leader's pictures. Of course, pay a little bit more, they have no problems stomping on their fathers and mothers.

3) To ensure the constant incoming of funds from their paymasters, pas is ever so ready to get rid anybody who stands for Islam. Hassan Ali was booted for standing up for Muslims, and next in line, maybe the under-fire Nasharuddin Mat Isa. It has always been interesting to see how scholars from pas' ulama faction like Nasharuddin have been discarded for empty vessels of the Erdogan faction like mat sapu, who basically has none of the religious knowledge not has any morality within himself. But pas needs the money, so to them, this has nothing to do with religion as I slam only serves as a factor for them to get votes.

Still on point 3, pas changed the most with the western/jewish funding. Among the 3 components of pakatan, pas has always been the poorest. In the past, their income usually comes from donation and some from the Tabung Memali. Now, their rallies are lavish and most of their leaders are well dressed, and now they struggle teeth and nails to preserve what they enjoy, even if it means sacrificing Islam from their basic fight. The ulama faction has been discarded like garbage in order to cater half-witted and Islamic knowledge lacking erdogan-backed leaders like mat sabu and mahfuz. The influx of former entertainers who lack religious knowledge taking place on their ceramah platforms seems like a move to replace the ulama faction. Any ulama in the world that makes any statement against pas, they will be slandered against. What have the funds turn pas into? Well, I guess the hadith below kinda reminds me of pas:

Dari Sahl bin Saad as-Saaidi r.a. berkata: Rasulullah s.a.w bersabda; "Ya Allah! Jangan kau temukan aku dan mudah-mudahan kamu (sahabat) tidak bertemu dengan suatu masa di mana para ulama sudah tidak diikut lagi, dan orang yang penyantun sudah tidak disegani lagi. Hati mereka seperti hati orang Ajam (pada fasiqnya), lidah mereka seperti lidah orang Arab (pada fasihnya)." (Riwayat Ahmad)

I guess for pas, it is easy to discard Islam in return for foreign funding. Why? Well, as I have written before, pas has never been Islamic, but we know that already. Islam is only a point they use to secure votes for themselves, or to scare people into voting them.

There's a catch, however. Remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch. There are requirements that you need to fulfill to get these foreign funds. Of course, along with that, you'll get the aid of the western media who can twist and spin any issues to your advantage. We have seen, back during the west's designed Currency Crisis in the late 1990s, how Tun Mahathir pushed away IMF's offer of loans as the requirements, if met, will only stand to destroy the Malays' economy. The same factor is met here. What are the requirements? We don't know but from what anwar is campaigning for, we can guess what will be sacrificed:

1) Islam to be taken off from being the official religion of Malaysia. Organizations like the IFC will have a free hand where Muslims are free to apostate without interference from any religious departments.

2) Human rights equality will be imposed: no such thing as Malay Special Privileges. Malays will share equal rights to everybody, although the other races will never share their economic power and wealth with the Malays.

3) With Islam removed and equality imposed, the Lesbian, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgendered organizations will also have their rights implemented.

So far, I wrote 3 elements that will be sacrificed. With the three main factors removed, one can only guess what the other things will be. For DAP, this will be good news: not only they win the second round of May 13th, the cheering crowd will be consisted of Muslims as well. They will also have a field day dismantling the Hak Istimewa Melayu and anything Islamic. Pas will just be an errand boy who is tasked with justifying their means and ends.

It feels good when you have organizations who can back you up financially, but they will never see how expensive it is to repay until it is too late. By the time they realize? Well, we'll be in the New World Order already, worshipping a one-eyed hybrid who claims himself god. To these organizations, funding groups like pakatan, sponsoring riots and chaos in the Muslim countries, arming Israel so that more Palestinians can be slaughtered is nothing to them as they have trillions of dollars in assets and hard cash. They don't mind "investing" in certain individuals or political groups, if it is sound and brings back good returns...although the returns do not have to be in cash, just domination" the New World Order. Once the country falls into their hands, with their puppets running the country under their thumb, their mission is complete.

Are we approaching the end of our independence?

To the participants of Bersih and the twits who were showing off their butt in public, I guess you are the proof of how strong the jewish sponsors are. Maybe the money is sweeter because you don't really have to work for it. To the Muslim Malays in pakatan, enjoy now because once pakatan is in power under the one-eyed organizations, you might just become beggars on your own land.
Pakatan had an open house in Alor Setar today, in conjunction with their Jajah Merdeka Malaysia tour. The turnout was not that good, except for the usual supporters from out-of-state. Why is that so? Do Kedahans like me refuse to go to events and eat food that is prepared by jewish sponsorship?

Do we still take our independence for granted?

How Many Syawals More Do We Have Before...

Spanish Inquisition On Muslims and Jews

History has seen how the Muslims faced numerous persecutions accross the world. The Spanish Inquisition was one of the most barbaric among all. Despite the massacres and tortures to force Muslims and Jews to convert to Christianity, it is also no secret that the Spanish retalitation was also based on the deep insult they felt being Europeans being conquered by an "uncivilized" sub-human: the Arabs and the Moors. It is also because of the inquisition that Spain consumes more pork than before, as it used to be their weapon for ethnic cleansing. They would hold banquets, and anybody who do not touch the pork will be arrested, tortured or even killed as they are deemed to be Muslims.

The vengeance was quite prolonged, when Spain conquered the Philipines, they forced the people there to convert to Christianity and forced them to rear pigs as well. The capital, Madinallah was changed to Manila. As a result, the Muslim majority (Moro) fled to Mindanao. Well, originally they were never called Moros but the appearance of the Muslim Malay warriors there reminded the Spaniards of the Moors who ruled them for hundreds of years, hence they called them Moro (Moor).

The Pol Pot regime of Cambodia, on the surface seemed to be unbiased in targetting their victims for mass murder, in reality they targeted the ethnic Cham people (Muslim Malays). The reason given is that the Chams are a different group of people who do not reflect Cambodia: the live differently, eat differently (halal), strong in their Islamic faith and have their own culture with strong family ties. This persecution was not new. The Muslim Chams, for a very short period of time, ruled Cambodia a few hundred years back before the Buddhist Khmers overran them, and the Khmers even tried to erase them from history.

Of course, the modern world is not spared from acts of persecution: the Bosnians, Kurds and of course, the Rohingyas.

Who are the Rohingyas? The Rohingyas, numbering less than 1 million in population are a Muslim ethnic group who resides in the Arakan region of western Myanmar. It’s amazing that Myanmarese (or Burmese) never considered them part of their own people despite them being there for the past 600 years. They are the descendants of Muslim Bengalese soldiers who were sent by the Sultan of Bengal to aide King Narameikhla to regain his kingdom in the Arakans. After the kingdom was established, they settled there. However, with the conquest of the Arakan by the Buddhist Burmese, the Rohingyas were persecuted, initiating their refugee status more than 400 years ago.  Is it strange that Burmese historians claim that there are no such people called Rohingyas in the history of Myanmar, when even the British conquerors of Burma recognized them? According to an article on the "Burma Empire" published by the British Francis Buchanan-Hamilton in 1799, "the Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan," "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." Hence, the term Rohingya was already established back then.

Where do they go from there? The “revered” democracy warrior Aung San Suu Kyi, has kept quiet about the whole Rohingya affair. She's more concerned about losing Myanmarese support if she places her support for the Rohingyas. (For full article, click here) The persecution is nearly complete: massacred, raped and pillaged by Burmese (every other junta does that to them), Japanese during WW2, and even unaccepted by Bangladesh.

We have seen the Palestinians suffering persecution by the non-semitic jews majority of the secular state of Israel for the last 60 years. These people, who came running down from high places after the great wall built by “He of Two Horns” came crumbling down at God’s promised time, have somehow felt that Jerusalem is theirs, despite never being from there at all. Just like the other persecuted Muslims in the world, we can only sit down and watch while the west legalizes their massacres. We try to help in certain ways, but we have also seen the Freedom Flotilla issue.

It seems that we have come to a point in time where being Muslims can be such a crime. Until the emergence of the Mahdi, we should be able to work with ourselves, unite and help our persecuted brethrens in any way possible. Is it still possible?

The Muslims in Malaysia is also moving towards destruction, if what is happening now is not stopped. We have seen how a self-proclaimed Islamic party called pas, became a tool of the One-Eyed when they made an alliance with anwar Ibrahim. We know that anwar has his strategies planned by people who are not even here. The west knows too well that the best way to destroy the Malays is to let them fight one another. It boggles the mind on how a "religious" party can work hand-in-hand with a group of anti-Islam like DAP, a socialist party. Then again, how surprisaed can we get if we know the truth about pas? With a politician self-proclaiming himself as ulama, and every larry, curly and moe leaders of pas getting automatically referred to as "Ustaz", whether they know anything about religion or not, the Hadiths on the end of times becomes clearer and clearer. Under their guidance, and anwar's, it's not a wonder that we see Malays joining dap. How can we be surprised anymore to see Muslim Malays joining anwar's NED-planned riots such as Bersih, even though they know too well that the events were created with jewish-sponsorship, the same money that was used to ensure the persecution that we read above.

We can work with the people who persecute us? Seriously...

What will happen to the Muslim, especially Muslim Malays if dap rules? We have seen how Rohingyas, Muslims of Spain, Bosnians and Chams become targets for extinction because at one time in the past, they were with fighting against the powers that be of today. Maybe it's too hard to imagine, but I leave you with what dap war-cry were during the May 13th 1969 incident:

From ParpuKari:

Pada 11 Mei penyokong DAP berteriak:

"Apa polis boleh buat, kita raja. Buang sama polis Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang pada hari yang sama, DAP melaung:

"Mati Melayu, sakai pergi masuk hutan."

Di Jalan Changkat Dollah pula mereka mengapi-apikan bahawa:

"KL sekarang Cina punya."

Sehari kemudian pada 12 Mei di Jalan Ipoh dan Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman, penyokong DAP menjerit:

"Melayu balik kampung, Melayu sekarang tidak ada kuasa. Sekarang kita Cina sudah 'control'."

How many Muslims have we killed?

Malah sejarah mencatat kenyataan angkuh Kit Siang sendiri di Jalan Khir, Kampung Baru, di hadapan orang Melayu ini denga berkata:

"Melayu keluar! Apa lagi duduk sini, kita hentam lu, sekarang kita sudah ada kuasa."

Keesokan harinya pada 12 Mei di hadapan Balai Polis Jalan Pudu, penyokong Cina DAP terus melaungkan:

"...semua Melayu kasi habis, kasi halau semua polis."

"Apa ini Melayu, kita sudah perintah dia negeri, ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, mata-mata lancau."

Hari yang sama mereka juga mengutuk bangsa Melayu di Jalan Canvel:

"Butuh Melayu, Malai si, pergi mati Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang, DAP pula berkata;

"Ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, kita mahu kasi halau semua Melayu."

Their intention, even if it's 43 years ago, are very clear on the Malays.

To create more misery, even Christian movements are moving in to divert Malays away from Islam. Being from a Syed family, we have been always been aware of this for a very long time as there had been an old warning that the Syeds' conversion from Islam will fetch a very high price for any church. Of course, I don't know much detail on that except for the fact that we were taught that the enemies of Islam have always been afraid and intimidated by the descendants of the Prophet Muhammad's family.


We have heard how Malay and Malay-looking priests were brought in from Singapore, Indonesia and the Phillipines for this purpose. The churches have special units now to gain more "Christian Malays Where is pas' stand on this? We know anwar supports acts of apostacy, and pas has always been ball-less on this issue. Dr Hassan Ali's expulsion from pas and his exco position for the raid on a church in Selangor is a big proof on that. As Islam in pas weakens (if there were any), and with pas' use of religion only to intimidate people into voting for them, do the Muslims in Malaysia stand a chance? Well, with pakatan getting more and more anti-Malaysia and anti-Islam in their stand, I guess the road is open wide.

I understand that some churches have begun using Allah in their sermons. So, which is it? Is Allah the father, son or the holy ghost? Or is He all three? Is the Holy Ghost the same as the Pengundi Hantu? How many do you worship? Can 3 be 1? I'm lost here...send me a priest, maybe we can do an exorcism.

Is the future of the Muslim Malays persecution? Will they be persecuted just because they are Muslims? With dap gaining advantage from anwar's NED strategy and pas' cowardice, looks like we are heading there. We do not know when the one-eyed, or the al-masikh will show himself, maybe he's here already, or maybe not, but his plans have been in place for a very long time. Muslim Malays are just a speck in his plans, but Muslims as a whole has always been a problem to him. It's a question of faith. We have read how poverty and misery caused Muslims to convert after being helped by agents of the church, or a "saviour". Remember that, when the one-eyed is about to appear, the world will be in such a misery where economic turmoil and a water-lacking world turned barren made people, Muslims or not, run in droves to embrace the al-masikh as a saviour.

Syawal is here. Let us rejoice for what we have, but spare a thought of what we will lose if we do not stop going at each other's throats. Think of what our children will never have once anwar sell us to his masters. Spare a thought to our brothers who are being persecuted. Give some time to ensure our children understand our faith well. Will our future generations be celebrating Eid-ul-Fitri, or Christmas? Will they be making pilgrimage to Mecca or the Holy Sepulchre? The one-eyed plan is still on-going, and we have yet to witness the emergence of the Mahdi.

Muslims must unite beyond politics.

As of that, I wish all Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Fitri, Maaf Zahir dan Batin. Bapak3 signing off. Wassalam

So, From The Rising Eye, A Dove Cometh....

So much for taking a break during the Ramadhan month. I saw the pakatan logo for National Day previously, and I guess, not just me, but many saw the dove portrayed in the logo prominently. I'm sure pakatan will refer the dove as "freedom" but we have always known that there is always more than meets the eye with pakatan.

I read a very good and detailed analysis by Helen Ang on this issue, and it is best that the articles be referred here

Logo Hari Merdeka Pakatan ada elemen-elemen Kristian
(https://helenang.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/logo-hari-merdeka-pakatan-ada-elemen-elemen-kristian/)
Ogos 10, 2012 at 4:15 am

Burung merpati melambangkan Roh Kudus, iaitu jasad ketiga Tuhan Triniti dalam agama Kristian. 

Simbolisme burung merpati merah adalah berdasarkan tindakan “Christ redeemed Man with his blood”.

Lihat logo ciptaan Pakatan (bawah) untuk sambutan ulang tahun kemerdekaan — dilaporkan oleh Harakah

Banyak ayat al-Kitab (terutamanya buku-buku Gospel) yang merujuk kepada burung merpati.

Surah John 1:32

    Ayat 32 John testified saying, “I have seen the Spirit descending as a dove out of heaven, and He remained upon Him. 33 “I did not recognize Him, but He who sent me to baptize in water said to me, ‘He upon whom you see the Spirit descending and remaining upon Him, this is the One who baptizes in the Holy Spirit.’ 34 “I myself have seen, and have testified that this is the Son of God.”

Matthew 3:16

    16 As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him. 17 And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”

Mark 1:10

    10 Immediately coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opening, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him; 11 and a voice came out of the heavens: “You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased.”

Luke 3:22

    22 and the Holy Spirit descended upon Him in bodily form like a dove, and a voice came out of heaven, “You are My beloved Son, in You I am well-pleased.”

Lihat juga bentuk kelopak bunga raya yang terkandung dalam logo Pakatan. Bandingkan dengan nyalaan api dengan imajan burung merpati dan juga logo Ignite.

(Kemeja-T untuk sambutan Subang Rally – “Take Subang for Jesus” – juga menggunakan cogankata ‘Ignite for Christ’. Baca sini ).

Hati merah suci merupakan satu lagi simbol penting dalam ikonografi Kristian.

Logo Hari Kemerdekaan yang direkacipta Pakatan mempunyai simbol burung merpati, hati merah dan kelopak bunga yang nampaknya macam nyalaan api Holy Spirit.

Simbol Gereja

Burung merpati adalah lambang gereja.

Ia juga simbol Kristian dalam lukisan-lukisan bercorak keagamaan serta digunakan sebagai hiasan popular untuk kad Krismas dan kad ucapan tahniah bagi upacara pengkristianan bayi dan kanak-kanak.

The Church: Dove as a symbol of the Church, the agent through which the Holy Spirit works on Earth.

Pentecost: Whitsunday, a feast of the universal Church which commemorates the Descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles, 50 days after the Resurrection of Christ.

    Saint Gregory is generally shown with a dove on his shoulder, symbolizing inspiration or rather Divine guidance.

Baptism: The dove symbol occurs frequently in connection with early representations of baptism.

In ancient times a dove-like vessel was frequently suspended over the baptismal fount.

Martyrdom: As a symbol of martyrdom it indicated the action of the Holy Spirit in bestowal of the fortitude necessary for the endurance of suffering.

Sumber: New Advent

Dove as a Christian symbol, rujuk http://www.jesuswalk.com/christian-symbols/dove.htm


I am guessing that the pakatan logo was never designed by a Muslim, or could have been designed outside of Malaysia itself. This is quite common as we know anwar's strategies have been formulated outside of the country. Is it also a coincidence that the dove logo is also used by the Dove Outreach Centre whose leader wanted to burn the Holy Qur'an?

Does it ever surprise anybody anymore? The logo, coming from a party headed by a chap who uses other symbols (most probably, his bosses') as his logo? No, anwar might not be using any dove, but he sure has a lot of one-eyes supporting him, from the rising Eye of Horus, to the rising eye of PKR logo.

With all those eyes, anwar and pakatan can never see the truth...

Maybe it is time for Muslims and Malaysians know just who anwar and his pakatan are, and who are the people hiding in plain sight, aiding him. Maybe it is time for pakatan supporters to see with both eyes who they are supporting. Of course, if they can see, will they ever believe? That's a different question.

 Hadith - Bukhari 9.241, Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar

Allah's Apostle stood up amongst the people and then praised and glorified Allah as He deserved and then he mentioned Ad-Dajjal, saying, "I warn you of him, and there was no prophet but warned his followers of him; but I will tell you something about him which no prophet has told his followers: Ad-Dajjal is one-eyed whereas Allah is not."

After All The One Eyed's And West' Aid, Why Is Anwar Still The Opposition?

It must be said here that, the Holy Al-Al Qur’an and Hadith have forewarned the Muslims of the days to come. The messages may be cryptic and deciphering them on the whole might require more knowledge than human have now. We can be assured that some theories have been advanced and the world looks in a different way. The wall built to seal off the group of people who “causes mischief on earth" have long crumbled. Those people have already inter-bred with the people mainly in the west, where the sun is rising from now. The one-eyed, at one point of hidden history has met them and collaborated with each other, but each of them keeps a suspicious at each other as both parties want to dominate the world.

With the creation of the illegal secular state of Israel after World War 2, concentrations were given in keeping the security of the state. With US, UK and other European countries keeping an eye on the security, the "people from behind the mountains" that now rules Israel can run the world as it sees fit, by proxy.

The hadith on the end of times chronology stated about these people where God commanded to Jesus to bring his followers to a mountain for shelter from these attacking people, stating that no man can destroy them but God. It can be derived that these people, who originally were cunning barbarians that were feared by almost all civilizations, and were blocked from the world by "He of Two Horns", have now evolved into a civilized, disciplined and intellectual bunch of murderers who will not be defeated until the right time. They have always been smart: in the past, knowing that they could not withstand the might of the Muslim army, they devised an ideological war, which led to in-fighting amongst Muslims.

The west today, still learns and studies any movements, organizations and even countries they decide as a "threat" to their survival. We have seen in the past how "regime changes" came about as "the unbound voice of democracy arises." Somewhere along the line, there's always the west poking their fingers in that particular mess. During the Cold War, the west via CIA tried to assassinate Fidel Castro by so many ways but failed, but they managed to execute President Salvador Allende of Chile, a popularly elected leader who is also a Marxist. Their proxy was General Augusto Pinochet, who was given support and sponsorship to launch a coup de tat against Allende's government. The army under Pinochet "suicided" Allende. This was all done to protect US business interest in Chile, and for this, the country suffered the next 25 years under the brutal regime of Augosto Pinochet, US' proxy.

Even the clergy-powered, hardcore Shiite Iran was not spared. President George W Bush (yes, the hollow drunk) approved more than US100 dollar to NGOs in Iran to support the opposition parties against President Ahmadinejad during the 2009 elections. Sure enough, the Iranian opposition suddenly became grand with riots exploding everywhere, but with the clergies in the driving seat and Ahmadinejad's victory, along with the Iranian parliament calling for the executions for the 2 opposition leaders who have been inciting the riots with sponsored cash, the riots died down. Bush failed in his attempt to overthrow the Iranian government. Bush faced impeachment, where among the listed crimes was Article 21of the Kucinich/Wexler impeachment articles: "the president misled Congress and the American people about threats from Iran, and supported terrorist organizations within Iran, with the goal of overthrowing the Iranian government."

Even the Popular Uprising in the Middle East is not excluded from their prying hands. The two greatest events that took place which captured the global community were the Tunisian Revolution that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (Zainal Abidin Bin Ali) of Tunisia and the Egyptian Uprising that finally ousted Hosni Mubarak. The political scenarios were already ripe for revolutions as both leaders of the country had been staunch US allies and supporters, while the majority of the people were not. In Tunisia, the suicide of 26 year old Mohamad Bouazizi by burning himself because his livelihood was confiscated by authorities became the starting point of the revolution. In Egypt, the murder of Khaled Mohamed Saeed by Egypt's secret police culminated into the downfall of President Hosni Mubarak. Basic human rights and fair elections also became the rallying cry in their uprising. Economic conditions were added to these in Libya and Syria.

The uprising took a strange turn in Egypt when Muslims and Coptics (The Egyptian Orthodox Christians) starting clashing over religious intolerance. This is one of the most bizarre points as the Muslims, for hundreds of years, have always respected the Coptics.

It is true that it was the conditions in each country by its respective leaders that led to the uprising, somewhere along the way, the west played their cards as well. Scores of sponsored NGOs and agents have been in those countries, such as National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Young Republicans and many more. For decades they have been seeding unrest by advocating western ideology, or maybe just pretending as humanitarian aid. Their tasks are not military, but more oratory and media-related. With the murder/suicide triggering their cue, hatred and hostility can easily be spread by tongue and received by the angry hearts of the people of the nation. With Mubarak and Ben Ali out, it goes to show that US never even bothered to help the very people they groomed and goes to show further that anybody chosen by the west is expendable.

The current Syrian unrest begs more question than ever. Over time, I have read how many Syrian soldiers and public left the army to join FSA (Free Syrian Army), and how smugglers had a hard job of supplying arms to them.. Their weapons are usually brand new and they are not from the Syrian army depot. Who is the actual group or individual sponsoring the weapons? What is more frightening is that the weapons seem to be more advanced compared to the army.

Will the new leaders of the countries be able to steer their people away from the turmoil? History denotes that each of those countries will face decades of unrest, or at least an uneasy peace. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq, despite the west placing their designed leader there, the fighting continues...just like what the west wanted. I wouldn't cheer for the new Islamist President of Egypt, Mohammed Mossi yet as I will need to read between the lines of whose alliance he is on and which direction he is taking.

These are the basic list of what they fought for in the Popular Uprising:
1) Basic human rights
2) Clean and fair elections
3) Economy

The west has indeed found the best and ultimate way to exercise regime change in countries they deem necessary, without military or any visible hand of theirs, by using the people of the nation. The days of sending snipers and sponsoring disgruntled generals of the army of that particular country may soon be over. What can be cleaner than instigating riots and violence that will oust the leader than by turning the citizens into puppets for their own play? We have seen how they butchered Gaddafi. Still, there are questions that remain unanswered:
a) How come people like Marcos and Ben Ali, among some, can never be extradited to their countries of origin?
b) Is it sheer coincidence that US-sponsored leaders like Hosni Mubarak and Soeharto were suddenly hit by stroke right after they were deposed?
c) How come leaders, who used to be US-allied, like Saddam Hussin were hastily tried and executed. Even the trial became more like a show to the world.

Never give the west an inch, or they'll take over your land. History taught us that, but it seems that even in Malaysia, after hundreds of years under colonization, anwar and pakatan seem to be opening up more space than needed in their lust for power.

In a true template to the west' design, anwar played the same card...although with different results. Along with dap, pkr and the dope among all, pas, they went around sowing seeds of disunity. Mind you, these "seeds of disunity" are the points that the west consider good enough to topple a country if exposed and strategically attacked.

The racial disunity card was played well by anwar and his pakatan. Institutions that help Malays and Bumiputras were condemned as corrupt and self-serving. They even attacked the New Economic Program as "a corrupt program that enriches only politicians."

Religious insensitivity was introduced by pakatan, spearheaded by DAP. Lim guan eng and the dyspeptic kapal sink were loud in making their anti-Islamic stand, followed suit by Bar Council. Worse, ambiga promoted the Inter-Faith Commission and along with pakatan, threw their weight in for the apostasy of Lina Joy.

Polis Diraja Malaysia received much of the brunt of the attack by pakatan. Painted as brutal, corrupt and government's dogs, pakatan even staged several dramas where they provoke police by attacking them, and once the police retaliate, they start taking pictures to be sold to the world. Unfortunately for anwar, he went to the same well one too many times. His stage plays have been recorded during the bersih riots. This is the usual effort to attack any country's public defense. I wonder why anwar never mentioned about the US police and National Guard bashing Occupy demonstrators in Minnesota a month or so ago.

 In another effort to further weaken the defenses of the nation, anwar attacked the army as well (click here for article) by claiming that the army is the hand that ensures Barisan's winning by ordering that all ballot papers must have Barisan Nasional checked beforehand. He also claimed that the army will always be ready to take over the country should ever Barisan lose the general election. This is necessary to create distrust between the public and the army and even among the army themselves. We should always remember, the police and the army played pivotal roles in securing the nation during the May 13th Riots.

Pakatan rakyat has been claiming of how bad the economy in Malaysia has been, with most GLCs facing disaster, i.e. Felda going bankrupt and that sort. But they were left with their mouth open and their cheeks slapped tight when Felda announced huge windfalls for Felda settlers. Even the settlers who have been severely critical of Felda had to force themselves to be unabashed to collect their cheques, while pakatan got bashed. Their red faces of embarrassment glowed so bright that one could swear that it was Chinese New Year.


Anwar and pakatan, along with ambiga and bar council staged the bersih rallies, sponsored by NED via George Soros. By strategic planning of the NGO, and paid spectators, bersih became the ugliest event in the country, causing millions of RM in damages. This move did confuse many, even in the west. With pakatan winning 5 states in the 2008 General Elections, why is anwar claiming that the election was dirty and corrupt? If BN keeps winning all the time with more than 90% majority (like in the case of Ben Ali), it would've been a different question altogether. On the other hand, the bersih rally was a blessing to Malaysians: they get to see how pakatan degraded themselves to be terrorists and became pawns of the west. In return, the final bersih rally threw dirt into anwar and pakatan's face when they had to deal with so much anger from the public. I must say that, despite getting Malaysians to be angry, anwar and pakatan got them on the wrong side of the scale.

Let's see now, anwar and his pakatan rakyat have followed the recipe given by the west and spent the sponsorship freely, but what went wrong? Why are they still the opposition? Why isn't anwar the President of the Republic of Malaysia yet? Didn't the west studied Malaysia's fragile points already and taught anwar properly on how to strategically destroy them? In fact, Malaysia has always been a strong opposition to Israel and has always been vocal about it, shouldn't the west want that threat neutralized?

Maybe anwar should wonder to himself, is the west serious in their attempts to place him as the leader of this nation? Have they forsaken him because he spoke against Israel on the Freedom Flotilla issue? Or because he keeps mucking up by having more and more of his tight secrets being revealed by his once-loyal-supporters and Ummi Hafilda? The latest revelation on his a few billions of RM in his accounts is making him more popular in the wrong way. His support for Israel's security, while it puts a smile on the west, made him enemies of the Muslims and his reputation with Hamas is questionable...although it has always been questionable in the first place. The lack of attendants to his ceramahs is beginning to show how much liability he is to pakatan and to the west. With more videos slated to be released on anwar's slam-bang-thank you-ma'am by his once loyal close aides, the west might have to rethink of their strategies.

History has shown how the west chose less-than-clean individuals to be the replacement leader of certain nations, as they always need skeletons in the closet for controlling factorbut it is not supposed to be that obvious. Even anwar's face demonstrates the diminishing luster and aura. Is the west dumping him? Even if they do, the damage has been done, and it will take time to repair them. Pas might have to look deep into their hearts; their reputation (if any) has been annihilated by their participation with anwar in pakatan. The mega-pig farm, Madrasah Salihiah waqf land, pubs and nite-clubs in Kedah, their support for Lina Joy's apostasy, their non-action on the use of "Allah" by other religions, their shameful act of turning Unit Amal into terrorists and their ever loyal support for a man who supports Israel and supported by Jews despite their so-called Islamic stand, these have so much eroded Muslims' trust in pas. Having anwar, pkr and dap turning their backs on the Muslims and Malays is a grave injury, but with pas joining them to do the same made it fatal.


I don't think the west really cares what happens to anwar after this; the Neo-cons have lost their power base under Obama. To the jews, Malaysia is not located anywhere on the land which they claim is God's promise to Abraham: from the banks of the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. To the one eyed, anwar is just a speck of dust of one wannabe leader whose worth is 5 sen a dozen.

While the Muslims and Malays fight one another in Malaysia, guess who's laughing at the dap hq. Oh yes, by the way, with all of the Muslim countries fighting amongst themselves, including us, guess who's laughing in the conquered land of Bayt-ul Maqdis?

Bersih 3.0 - Suffering The Consequences of Their Own Actions

It all started with a dream: anwar thought bersih 3.0 will finally make him President of Malaysia, Azmin thought he and nurul izzah will be Vice President, along with guan eng. They thought they'll be having Roman orgies in Putrajaya, all sexual allegations thrown aside and serve their masters well...well, that did not happen. What bersih 3.0 brought was nothing but misery, first to Malaysians, and now to pakatan themselves.

It has been seen how the squabble between the actual bersih demonstrators have now voiced out vocally against anwar's hijacking (or at least that's what they thought) of the event by his paid rioters. Those who came to actually protest peacefully saw their lives rolling in front of their eyes when the sponsored demonstrators took over and rampaged through the area. The young independent film-maker did confront anwar (for full story, click here ), but as usual, when anwar finds himself unable to defend or justify anything, he ensure that the young man was manhandled away from the press conference.

The ambiguous ambiga did not fare better either. After "strangely" unable to control (again and as usual) her bersih 3.0 demonstrators from going berserk on cue, she has since never apologized or at least try to look sorry for the paid destruction bersih 3.0 made. Traders and small entrepreneurs who have long been angry with bersih organizers this time set up peaceful protests and there's even a burger stall set up in front of her home. (for story, click here ). With burgers, ambiga was also served buns by Army veterans today (for full story, click here ). So far, we haven't seen anwar with sausages and azmin with refreshing medical ice-cream.

Speaking of anwar and ambiguous...errr...ambiga, from the turmoil of anwar's press conference, it seems that: 1) Ambiga actually planned a peaceful demonstrations 2) anwar planned the riot 3) A miscommunication between anwar and ambiga almost cost the actual peaceful demonstrators their lives Really? It looks more like ambiga knows what anwar has been cooking all the while, but never bothered to tell her participants.

Still on the two pagliaccis, what about the so-called NGOs who supported the rally? It sounds grand when anwar and ambiga stated that 80 NGOs supported them, but really, why are 61 of them never existed? It's bad enough that bersih is funded by non-Malaysian groups who had more success in the Middle East, but a rally supported by non-existent groups too? (For full story and list, click here )

The bersih 3.o performance fiasco brought an almost forgotten individual back into the limelight. Tan Sri Rahim Noor, the former Police IGP, famous for giving anwar the black eye, called the decrepit n.ajis, pas' mursyidul am leader as Father of Infidels, or "Bapa Kafir." The statement was highly controversial, especially for devout pas worshippers who consider the statement as a sacrilege. For other Muslims who know n.ajis as just another politician disguised as an ulama, the statement was in a way, well, not very nice to say but accurate in many degrees. For a man who uses and manipulates Islam for his advantage in order to win polls just got what he deserved. Paying people in order to cause destruction and he branded the violent acts as halal? Praising a program sponsored by euro-jewish conspirators from the same piggy bank that was used to murder Palestinians and create chaos and deaths in other Muslim countries? Verily, n.ajis is a lost cause and a lost soul. We would suggest that he meet somebody like Sheikh Imran Hosein, but we know that n.ajis will claim that he's too pious for that.

Even the socialist dap was not spared from these ass-biting repercussions of bersih 3.0. The vocal protests from their own national Vice Chairman, YM Tunku Aziz Tunku Ibrahim was deemed too much by the socialists. The senator's term was not extended and the highly principled Tunku Aziz left dap with his dignity intact and the socialists in shambles.

Tunku Aziz joined dap in 2008 and was almost immediately appointed as Vice Chairman of the party in the same year. Of course, dap stated that it was the honor bestowed on Tunku although it was actually a bait trying to get Malays to join dap. Dap is no stranger to riots and unrests, as we have ready history, especially when it comes to the May 13th incident. Just like the communists who tried to enlist Malays to be in their godless and violent fight, dap tried to entice any Malays who are dimwitted enough to join their socialist group by placing a Malay at the top of their party. So, did dap take action on Tunku Aziz because he really spoke against the bersih rally or is it because Tunku Aziz was trying to stop fellow Muslim Malays from being jack-asses who had been played into the one-eyed game? We have seen in the past how dap always stayed at home everytime a demonstration erupts violently, where Muslims go against Muslims, Malays go against Malays. Dap would really love that. Tunku Aziz has parted way with dap(http://espresi.com/showthread.php?1085-Tunku-Aziz-quits-DAP), and it seems that dap's mega-bucks cannot buy him now.

Pas is now waiting with bated breath as the Saudi government will decide on the pilgrimage quota for Malaysia. It all started when some yellow-brained pas members decide to bring Bersih rally to Mecca, hoping it will go viral. Well, somebody please give that twit something anti-viral, the Saudi government went ballistic as they have seen the destructive force of something similar to that in the countries around them, and truth to say, bringing a jewish-sponsored program to Mecca is never a good idea. If the Saudi government really reduces the quota, then pas and pakatan will be condemned by thousands upon thousands of eager pilgrim-to-be who might just see their chances of going to pilgrimage to Mecca being delayed, all of this because some chaps from a party who thought they are most Islamic ruin them all with some yellow shirt and jewish-sponsored ideology.

The bersih rally cry during Najib's visit was described as something very comical. My cousin e-mailed me on this matter, and I saw it on Youtube. It seemed that only 2 or 3 people try to sabotage the event with the bersih chant, but instead of the chant getting viral, Najib replied to them kindly, and this in short humuliated the few, and the majority of Malaysians there were so happy when the hecklers finally shut up. It seems that Malaysians there are still talking about the cool reaction of Najib, and those few bersih supporters are still extremely angry because nobody supported them.

So, what have been the benefits of bersih 3.0 to pakatan? Looks more like they had fire up in their asses, now ain't that a kick to their heads?

How would a rally which has been designed, strategized and funded by cronies of the one-eye benefit Malaysians when the same program in a different cover caused so much misery and death in other Islamic countries?

What's so Malaysian about bersih when the money for the program and participants come from outside of Malaysia?

How would Malaysians benefit from bersih when it made so much destruction on properties which have been paid for by Malaysians through their taxes?

Even when the program was taken abroad for viral reasons, it became pathetically insignificant, and even if it did, Malaysian Muslims who want to go on pilgrimage now are threatened with a reduction in quota because of it.

Malaysians have seen the violence and the terrible devastation brought upon by bersih 3.0, and I guess by now Malaysians really want to let anwar and his pakatan to feel the repercussions. Maybe it is ime for anwar and his pakatan to suffer the consequences of their own actions. On this, I remember my old Ustaz, who at one time said, "Evil intentions will only bring undesirable repercussions to one's self."

Too bad, Anwar. Maybe you'll need the one-eyed to send his army to make you President. 


Ambiga said, there'll be no Bersih 4...really, who believes her anyway? It's not her call anyway.

The One-Eyed Factor Behind Anwar - Saying What Has Been Said

There were times over and over again when we tried to inform people of these shadowy movements lurking behind anwar ibrahim and his so-called reformasi movement, but for that, we were branded as madmen, doom-sayers, lunatics and list goes on and on.

Today, by the grace of God, Malaysians have finally seen or at least, sensed the existence of this unsavoury existence of the one-eyed element manifesting within anwar's actions.

On the shadowy elements behind anwar and his so-called movements, check out the article below:

The foreign factor on April 28
By M. VEERA PANDIYAN, The Star, 10 May 12

Bersih’s peaceful supporters have the right to know the nexus between the ‘free and fair’ polls movement, the Pakatan Rakyat leader and foreign financial and political backers.

SOMETIMES, knowing too many people can be painful, especially when they try to draw you into political discussions in the most unlikely of places.

As a rule, I have always refrained from talking politics in restaurants or pubs but these days, it’s become a guideline that’s hard to keep.

It appears that, recently, almost everyone has become an expert on politics – even those who had never bothered to vote before, despite being in their 40s and 50s.

The problem with these new political pundits is that they want to convert you to their side and refuse to listen to alternate viewpoints.

There is no doubt that the April 28 Bersih 3.0 protest has created more such people besides widening the gap between supporters of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

The rally, the biggest that the country has seen so far, is also significant because most of those who turned up did so in peace, seeking free and fair elections.

Understandably, this group is upset that Opposition politicians hijacked the rally which turned ugly in the end.

A new website – www.dearambiga.com – says in its introduction: “We are angry. Why?

Because Bersih should be an NGO by the people, for the people of all races, areas and political views.

“But in Bersih 3.0, some Pakatan Rakyat bosses took advantage of our noble cause for their own political interests and benefit!”

The website has a clip of a heated exchange between independent filmmaker Benji Lim and Pakatan Rakyat’s Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over the hijacking of the rally.

It also has a petition titled “Time to stop Pakatan Rakyat hijacking our movement”, and urges visitors to e-mail Ambiga on the issue.

Perhaps, the peaceful people and those behind the website should take a closer look at allegations that bigger forces are behind the movement.

Tony Cartalucci of the Land Destroyer Report website, for example, says that Bersih’s leadership is being supported financially and politically by foreign organisations.

He cited a Malaysian Insider report on June 27, 2011 in which the Bersih leader admitted receiving money from two US organisations – the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) – for projects which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 Bersih 2.0 march.

However, he wrote that the NDI website revealed that funding and training had indeed been provided before the organisation removed the information and replaced it with a more benign version, purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.

He said the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to the movement suggested “something more sinister at play”.

“That Anwar himself was Chair-man of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined NED’s Democracy Award and a panelist at an NED donation ceremony – the very same organisation whose subsidiaries are funding and supporting Bersih – casts irrefutable doubt on their official agenda for clean and fair elections,” he wrote.

As such, Cartalucci said claims by Bersih supporters that Anwar had hijacked their movement rang hollow when looking at both his and Bersih’s entwined foreign financial and political backers.

He said with Bersih leaders’ recipients of aid from NED and OSI, and Anwar being a functionary of the IMF, it was certain that no matter how genuine Bersih’s rank and file might be, the fruits of their efforts would be the destabilisation and neo-recolonisation of a country that had fought long and hard to work its way out from Western imperialism.

If indeed the movement is about civil society’s rights to free and fair elections, Malaysians deserve to know more about these links.

But I doubt if people would rush to check the veracity of such reports or demand an explanation.

Blame it on what psychologists call “confirmation bias”. It is the propensity to look for what confirms one’s beliefs and ignore what contradicts them. It’s more pronounced when it comes to politics.

> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this quote by English philosopher William Penn: Passion is the mob of the man, that commits a riot upon his reason.

Was it all necessary in the first place? For anwar, it seems that the politics of anger is about to devour him alive. People were angry with the government back in 2008 during the nitwit and son-in-law's reign. Najib's diplomacy and radical transformations seemed to be in favor of Malaysians on the whole, much to anwar's ire. With much to gain from the programs and policies, anger has been long discarded and this put anwar's dream in jeopardy. For pakatan to keep their dreams of winning alive, they need people to remain angry. Spin and spin, lies after lies but nothing seem to work, and they had banked a lot on the bersih program.

Bersih 3.0 was supposed to be viral, or at least on paper, which was supposed to lead to a major revolt, overthrowing the government and implementing a regime change to which anwar would benefit, and it all started with a few simple instructions to his refreshing dessert, azmin ali just be fore anwar disappeared from view totally. It was the beginning of the biggest flop ever, and like the movie Heaven's Gate, it was hugely budgeted, massively constructed but tanked dismally. Anwar still wakes up every morning, asking himself, "Why am I still not a President?" The anger most Malaysians have now is with anwar and his pakatan for the massive destruction they had caused to the taxpayers.

Will his sponsors now commit to a bigger and more unscrupulous, more massive scaled riot called Bersih 4? Rumours has it that the next bersih riot will be held during the general election, with riots to be conducted if Pakatan loses. Will that happen? With the huge budgets they have distributed and failure after failure that were returned, would those NGOs dare to sponsor a regime change on behest of one chap who's lusting for power?