How Many Syawals More Do We Have Before...

Spanish Inquisition On Muslims and Jews

History has seen how the Muslims faced numerous persecutions accross the world. The Spanish Inquisition was one of the most barbaric among all. Despite the massacres and tortures to force Muslims and Jews to convert to Christianity, it is also no secret that the Spanish retalitation was also based on the deep insult they felt being Europeans being conquered by an "uncivilized" sub-human: the Arabs and the Moors. It is also because of the inquisition that Spain consumes more pork than before, as it used to be their weapon for ethnic cleansing. They would hold banquets, and anybody who do not touch the pork will be arrested, tortured or even killed as they are deemed to be Muslims.

The vengeance was quite prolonged, when Spain conquered the Philipines, they forced the people there to convert to Christianity and forced them to rear pigs as well. The capital, Madinallah was changed to Manila. As a result, the Muslim majority (Moro) fled to Mindanao. Well, originally they were never called Moros but the appearance of the Muslim Malay warriors there reminded the Spaniards of the Moors who ruled them for hundreds of years, hence they called them Moro (Moor).

The Pol Pot regime of Cambodia, on the surface seemed to be unbiased in targetting their victims for mass murder, in reality they targeted the ethnic Cham people (Muslim Malays). The reason given is that the Chams are a different group of people who do not reflect Cambodia: the live differently, eat differently (halal), strong in their Islamic faith and have their own culture with strong family ties. This persecution was not new. The Muslim Chams, for a very short period of time, ruled Cambodia a few hundred years back before the Buddhist Khmers overran them, and the Khmers even tried to erase them from history.

Of course, the modern world is not spared from acts of persecution: the Bosnians, Kurds and of course, the Rohingyas.

Who are the Rohingyas? The Rohingyas, numbering less than 1 million in population are a Muslim ethnic group who resides in the Arakan region of western Myanmar. It’s amazing that Myanmarese (or Burmese) never considered them part of their own people despite them being there for the past 600 years. They are the descendants of Muslim Bengalese soldiers who were sent by the Sultan of Bengal to aide King Narameikhla to regain his kingdom in the Arakans. After the kingdom was established, they settled there. However, with the conquest of the Arakan by the Buddhist Burmese, the Rohingyas were persecuted, initiating their refugee status more than 400 years ago.  Is it strange that Burmese historians claim that there are no such people called Rohingyas in the history of Myanmar, when even the British conquerors of Burma recognized them? According to an article on the "Burma Empire" published by the British Francis Buchanan-Hamilton in 1799, "the Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan," "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." Hence, the term Rohingya was already established back then.

Where do they go from there? The “revered” democracy warrior Aung San Suu Kyi, has kept quiet about the whole Rohingya affair. She's more concerned about losing Myanmarese support if she places her support for the Rohingyas. (For full article, click here) The persecution is nearly complete: massacred, raped and pillaged by Burmese (every other junta does that to them), Japanese during WW2, and even unaccepted by Bangladesh.

We have seen the Palestinians suffering persecution by the non-semitic jews majority of the secular state of Israel for the last 60 years. These people, who came running down from high places after the great wall built by “He of Two Horns” came crumbling down at God’s promised time, have somehow felt that Jerusalem is theirs, despite never being from there at all. Just like the other persecuted Muslims in the world, we can only sit down and watch while the west legalizes their massacres. We try to help in certain ways, but we have also seen the Freedom Flotilla issue.

It seems that we have come to a point in time where being Muslims can be such a crime. Until the emergence of the Mahdi, we should be able to work with ourselves, unite and help our persecuted brethrens in any way possible. Is it still possible?

The Muslims in Malaysia is also moving towards destruction, if what is happening now is not stopped. We have seen how a self-proclaimed Islamic party called pas, became a tool of the One-Eyed when they made an alliance with anwar Ibrahim. We know that anwar has his strategies planned by people who are not even here. The west knows too well that the best way to destroy the Malays is to let them fight one another. It boggles the mind on how a "religious" party can work hand-in-hand with a group of anti-Islam like DAP, a socialist party. Then again, how surprisaed can we get if we know the truth about pas? With a politician self-proclaiming himself as ulama, and every larry, curly and moe leaders of pas getting automatically referred to as "Ustaz", whether they know anything about religion or not, the Hadiths on the end of times becomes clearer and clearer. Under their guidance, and anwar's, it's not a wonder that we see Malays joining dap. How can we be surprised anymore to see Muslim Malays joining anwar's NED-planned riots such as Bersih, even though they know too well that the events were created with jewish-sponsorship, the same money that was used to ensure the persecution that we read above.

We can work with the people who persecute us? Seriously...

What will happen to the Muslim, especially Muslim Malays if dap rules? We have seen how Rohingyas, Muslims of Spain, Bosnians and Chams become targets for extinction because at one time in the past, they were with fighting against the powers that be of today. Maybe it's too hard to imagine, but I leave you with what dap war-cry were during the May 13th 1969 incident:

From ParpuKari:

Pada 11 Mei penyokong DAP berteriak:

"Apa polis boleh buat, kita raja. Buang sama polis Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang pada hari yang sama, DAP melaung:

"Mati Melayu, sakai pergi masuk hutan."

Di Jalan Changkat Dollah pula mereka mengapi-apikan bahawa:

"KL sekarang Cina punya."

Sehari kemudian pada 12 Mei di Jalan Ipoh dan Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman, penyokong DAP menjerit:

"Melayu balik kampung, Melayu sekarang tidak ada kuasa. Sekarang kita Cina sudah 'control'."

How many Muslims have we killed?

Malah sejarah mencatat kenyataan angkuh Kit Siang sendiri di Jalan Khir, Kampung Baru, di hadapan orang Melayu ini denga berkata:

"Melayu keluar! Apa lagi duduk sini, kita hentam lu, sekarang kita sudah ada kuasa."

Keesokan harinya pada 12 Mei di hadapan Balai Polis Jalan Pudu, penyokong Cina DAP terus melaungkan:

"...semua Melayu kasi habis, kasi halau semua polis."

"Apa ini Melayu, kita sudah perintah dia negeri, ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, mata-mata lancau."

Hari yang sama mereka juga mengutuk bangsa Melayu di Jalan Canvel:

"Butuh Melayu, Malai si, pergi mati Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang, DAP pula berkata;

"Ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, kita mahu kasi halau semua Melayu."

Their intention, even if it's 43 years ago, are very clear on the Malays.

To create more misery, even Christian movements are moving in to divert Malays away from Islam. Being from a Syed family, we have been always been aware of this for a very long time as there had been an old warning that the Syeds' conversion from Islam will fetch a very high price for any church. Of course, I don't know much detail on that except for the fact that we were taught that the enemies of Islam have always been afraid and intimidated by the descendants of the Prophet Muhammad's family.


We have heard how Malay and Malay-looking priests were brought in from Singapore, Indonesia and the Phillipines for this purpose. The churches have special units now to gain more "Christian Malays Where is pas' stand on this? We know anwar supports acts of apostacy, and pas has always been ball-less on this issue. Dr Hassan Ali's expulsion from pas and his exco position for the raid on a church in Selangor is a big proof on that. As Islam in pas weakens (if there were any), and with pas' use of religion only to intimidate people into voting for them, do the Muslims in Malaysia stand a chance? Well, with pakatan getting more and more anti-Malaysia and anti-Islam in their stand, I guess the road is open wide.

I understand that some churches have begun using Allah in their sermons. So, which is it? Is Allah the father, son or the holy ghost? Or is He all three? Is the Holy Ghost the same as the Pengundi Hantu? How many do you worship? Can 3 be 1? I'm lost here...send me a priest, maybe we can do an exorcism.

Is the future of the Muslim Malays persecution? Will they be persecuted just because they are Muslims? With dap gaining advantage from anwar's NED strategy and pas' cowardice, looks like we are heading there. We do not know when the one-eyed, or the al-masikh will show himself, maybe he's here already, or maybe not, but his plans have been in place for a very long time. Muslim Malays are just a speck in his plans, but Muslims as a whole has always been a problem to him. It's a question of faith. We have read how poverty and misery caused Muslims to convert after being helped by agents of the church, or a "saviour". Remember that, when the one-eyed is about to appear, the world will be in such a misery where economic turmoil and a water-lacking world turned barren made people, Muslims or not, run in droves to embrace the al-masikh as a saviour.

Syawal is here. Let us rejoice for what we have, but spare a thought of what we will lose if we do not stop going at each other's throats. Think of what our children will never have once anwar sell us to his masters. Spare a thought to our brothers who are being persecuted. Give some time to ensure our children understand our faith well. Will our future generations be celebrating Eid-ul-Fitri, or Christmas? Will they be making pilgrimage to Mecca or the Holy Sepulchre? The one-eyed plan is still on-going, and we have yet to witness the emergence of the Mahdi.

Muslims must unite beyond politics.

As of that, I wish all Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Fitri, Maaf Zahir dan Batin. Bapak3 signing off. Wassalam

After All The One Eyed's And West' Aid, Why Is Anwar Still The Opposition?

It must be said here that, the Holy Al-Al Qur’an and Hadith have forewarned the Muslims of the days to come. The messages may be cryptic and deciphering them on the whole might require more knowledge than human have now. We can be assured that some theories have been advanced and the world looks in a different way. The wall built to seal off the group of people who “causes mischief on earth" have long crumbled. Those people have already inter-bred with the people mainly in the west, where the sun is rising from now. The one-eyed, at one point of hidden history has met them and collaborated with each other, but each of them keeps a suspicious at each other as both parties want to dominate the world.

With the creation of the illegal secular state of Israel after World War 2, concentrations were given in keeping the security of the state. With US, UK and other European countries keeping an eye on the security, the "people from behind the mountains" that now rules Israel can run the world as it sees fit, by proxy.

The hadith on the end of times chronology stated about these people where God commanded to Jesus to bring his followers to a mountain for shelter from these attacking people, stating that no man can destroy them but God. It can be derived that these people, who originally were cunning barbarians that were feared by almost all civilizations, and were blocked from the world by "He of Two Horns", have now evolved into a civilized, disciplined and intellectual bunch of murderers who will not be defeated until the right time. They have always been smart: in the past, knowing that they could not withstand the might of the Muslim army, they devised an ideological war, which led to in-fighting amongst Muslims.

The west today, still learns and studies any movements, organizations and even countries they decide as a "threat" to their survival. We have seen in the past how "regime changes" came about as "the unbound voice of democracy arises." Somewhere along the line, there's always the west poking their fingers in that particular mess. During the Cold War, the west via CIA tried to assassinate Fidel Castro by so many ways but failed, but they managed to execute President Salvador Allende of Chile, a popularly elected leader who is also a Marxist. Their proxy was General Augusto Pinochet, who was given support and sponsorship to launch a coup de tat against Allende's government. The army under Pinochet "suicided" Allende. This was all done to protect US business interest in Chile, and for this, the country suffered the next 25 years under the brutal regime of Augosto Pinochet, US' proxy.

Even the clergy-powered, hardcore Shiite Iran was not spared. President George W Bush (yes, the hollow drunk) approved more than US100 dollar to NGOs in Iran to support the opposition parties against President Ahmadinejad during the 2009 elections. Sure enough, the Iranian opposition suddenly became grand with riots exploding everywhere, but with the clergies in the driving seat and Ahmadinejad's victory, along with the Iranian parliament calling for the executions for the 2 opposition leaders who have been inciting the riots with sponsored cash, the riots died down. Bush failed in his attempt to overthrow the Iranian government. Bush faced impeachment, where among the listed crimes was Article 21of the Kucinich/Wexler impeachment articles: "the president misled Congress and the American people about threats from Iran, and supported terrorist organizations within Iran, with the goal of overthrowing the Iranian government."

Even the Popular Uprising in the Middle East is not excluded from their prying hands. The two greatest events that took place which captured the global community were the Tunisian Revolution that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (Zainal Abidin Bin Ali) of Tunisia and the Egyptian Uprising that finally ousted Hosni Mubarak. The political scenarios were already ripe for revolutions as both leaders of the country had been staunch US allies and supporters, while the majority of the people were not. In Tunisia, the suicide of 26 year old Mohamad Bouazizi by burning himself because his livelihood was confiscated by authorities became the starting point of the revolution. In Egypt, the murder of Khaled Mohamed Saeed by Egypt's secret police culminated into the downfall of President Hosni Mubarak. Basic human rights and fair elections also became the rallying cry in their uprising. Economic conditions were added to these in Libya and Syria.

The uprising took a strange turn in Egypt when Muslims and Coptics (The Egyptian Orthodox Christians) starting clashing over religious intolerance. This is one of the most bizarre points as the Muslims, for hundreds of years, have always respected the Coptics.

It is true that it was the conditions in each country by its respective leaders that led to the uprising, somewhere along the way, the west played their cards as well. Scores of sponsored NGOs and agents have been in those countries, such as National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Young Republicans and many more. For decades they have been seeding unrest by advocating western ideology, or maybe just pretending as humanitarian aid. Their tasks are not military, but more oratory and media-related. With the murder/suicide triggering their cue, hatred and hostility can easily be spread by tongue and received by the angry hearts of the people of the nation. With Mubarak and Ben Ali out, it goes to show that US never even bothered to help the very people they groomed and goes to show further that anybody chosen by the west is expendable.

The current Syrian unrest begs more question than ever. Over time, I have read how many Syrian soldiers and public left the army to join FSA (Free Syrian Army), and how smugglers had a hard job of supplying arms to them.. Their weapons are usually brand new and they are not from the Syrian army depot. Who is the actual group or individual sponsoring the weapons? What is more frightening is that the weapons seem to be more advanced compared to the army.

Will the new leaders of the countries be able to steer their people away from the turmoil? History denotes that each of those countries will face decades of unrest, or at least an uneasy peace. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq, despite the west placing their designed leader there, the fighting continues...just like what the west wanted. I wouldn't cheer for the new Islamist President of Egypt, Mohammed Mossi yet as I will need to read between the lines of whose alliance he is on and which direction he is taking.

These are the basic list of what they fought for in the Popular Uprising:
1) Basic human rights
2) Clean and fair elections
3) Economy

The west has indeed found the best and ultimate way to exercise regime change in countries they deem necessary, without military or any visible hand of theirs, by using the people of the nation. The days of sending snipers and sponsoring disgruntled generals of the army of that particular country may soon be over. What can be cleaner than instigating riots and violence that will oust the leader than by turning the citizens into puppets for their own play? We have seen how they butchered Gaddafi. Still, there are questions that remain unanswered:
a) How come people like Marcos and Ben Ali, among some, can never be extradited to their countries of origin?
b) Is it sheer coincidence that US-sponsored leaders like Hosni Mubarak and Soeharto were suddenly hit by stroke right after they were deposed?
c) How come leaders, who used to be US-allied, like Saddam Hussin were hastily tried and executed. Even the trial became more like a show to the world.

Never give the west an inch, or they'll take over your land. History taught us that, but it seems that even in Malaysia, after hundreds of years under colonization, anwar and pakatan seem to be opening up more space than needed in their lust for power.

In a true template to the west' design, anwar played the same card...although with different results. Along with dap, pkr and the dope among all, pas, they went around sowing seeds of disunity. Mind you, these "seeds of disunity" are the points that the west consider good enough to topple a country if exposed and strategically attacked.

The racial disunity card was played well by anwar and his pakatan. Institutions that help Malays and Bumiputras were condemned as corrupt and self-serving. They even attacked the New Economic Program as "a corrupt program that enriches only politicians."

Religious insensitivity was introduced by pakatan, spearheaded by DAP. Lim guan eng and the dyspeptic kapal sink were loud in making their anti-Islamic stand, followed suit by Bar Council. Worse, ambiga promoted the Inter-Faith Commission and along with pakatan, threw their weight in for the apostasy of Lina Joy.

Polis Diraja Malaysia received much of the brunt of the attack by pakatan. Painted as brutal, corrupt and government's dogs, pakatan even staged several dramas where they provoke police by attacking them, and once the police retaliate, they start taking pictures to be sold to the world. Unfortunately for anwar, he went to the same well one too many times. His stage plays have been recorded during the bersih riots. This is the usual effort to attack any country's public defense. I wonder why anwar never mentioned about the US police and National Guard bashing Occupy demonstrators in Minnesota a month or so ago.

 In another effort to further weaken the defenses of the nation, anwar attacked the army as well (click here for article) by claiming that the army is the hand that ensures Barisan's winning by ordering that all ballot papers must have Barisan Nasional checked beforehand. He also claimed that the army will always be ready to take over the country should ever Barisan lose the general election. This is necessary to create distrust between the public and the army and even among the army themselves. We should always remember, the police and the army played pivotal roles in securing the nation during the May 13th Riots.

Pakatan rakyat has been claiming of how bad the economy in Malaysia has been, with most GLCs facing disaster, i.e. Felda going bankrupt and that sort. But they were left with their mouth open and their cheeks slapped tight when Felda announced huge windfalls for Felda settlers. Even the settlers who have been severely critical of Felda had to force themselves to be unabashed to collect their cheques, while pakatan got bashed. Their red faces of embarrassment glowed so bright that one could swear that it was Chinese New Year.


Anwar and pakatan, along with ambiga and bar council staged the bersih rallies, sponsored by NED via George Soros. By strategic planning of the NGO, and paid spectators, bersih became the ugliest event in the country, causing millions of RM in damages. This move did confuse many, even in the west. With pakatan winning 5 states in the 2008 General Elections, why is anwar claiming that the election was dirty and corrupt? If BN keeps winning all the time with more than 90% majority (like in the case of Ben Ali), it would've been a different question altogether. On the other hand, the bersih rally was a blessing to Malaysians: they get to see how pakatan degraded themselves to be terrorists and became pawns of the west. In return, the final bersih rally threw dirt into anwar and pakatan's face when they had to deal with so much anger from the public. I must say that, despite getting Malaysians to be angry, anwar and pakatan got them on the wrong side of the scale.

Let's see now, anwar and his pakatan rakyat have followed the recipe given by the west and spent the sponsorship freely, but what went wrong? Why are they still the opposition? Why isn't anwar the President of the Republic of Malaysia yet? Didn't the west studied Malaysia's fragile points already and taught anwar properly on how to strategically destroy them? In fact, Malaysia has always been a strong opposition to Israel and has always been vocal about it, shouldn't the west want that threat neutralized?

Maybe anwar should wonder to himself, is the west serious in their attempts to place him as the leader of this nation? Have they forsaken him because he spoke against Israel on the Freedom Flotilla issue? Or because he keeps mucking up by having more and more of his tight secrets being revealed by his once-loyal-supporters and Ummi Hafilda? The latest revelation on his a few billions of RM in his accounts is making him more popular in the wrong way. His support for Israel's security, while it puts a smile on the west, made him enemies of the Muslims and his reputation with Hamas is questionable...although it has always been questionable in the first place. The lack of attendants to his ceramahs is beginning to show how much liability he is to pakatan and to the west. With more videos slated to be released on anwar's slam-bang-thank you-ma'am by his once loyal close aides, the west might have to rethink of their strategies.

History has shown how the west chose less-than-clean individuals to be the replacement leader of certain nations, as they always need skeletons in the closet for controlling factorbut it is not supposed to be that obvious. Even anwar's face demonstrates the diminishing luster and aura. Is the west dumping him? Even if they do, the damage has been done, and it will take time to repair them. Pas might have to look deep into their hearts; their reputation (if any) has been annihilated by their participation with anwar in pakatan. The mega-pig farm, Madrasah Salihiah waqf land, pubs and nite-clubs in Kedah, their support for Lina Joy's apostasy, their non-action on the use of "Allah" by other religions, their shameful act of turning Unit Amal into terrorists and their ever loyal support for a man who supports Israel and supported by Jews despite their so-called Islamic stand, these have so much eroded Muslims' trust in pas. Having anwar, pkr and dap turning their backs on the Muslims and Malays is a grave injury, but with pas joining them to do the same made it fatal.


I don't think the west really cares what happens to anwar after this; the Neo-cons have lost their power base under Obama. To the jews, Malaysia is not located anywhere on the land which they claim is God's promise to Abraham: from the banks of the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. To the one eyed, anwar is just a speck of dust of one wannabe leader whose worth is 5 sen a dozen.

While the Muslims and Malays fight one another in Malaysia, guess who's laughing at the dap hq. Oh yes, by the way, with all of the Muslim countries fighting amongst themselves, including us, guess who's laughing in the conquered land of Bayt-ul Maqdis?

The One-Eyed Factor Behind Anwar - Saying What Has Been Said

There were times over and over again when we tried to inform people of these shadowy movements lurking behind anwar ibrahim and his so-called reformasi movement, but for that, we were branded as madmen, doom-sayers, lunatics and list goes on and on.

Today, by the grace of God, Malaysians have finally seen or at least, sensed the existence of this unsavoury existence of the one-eyed element manifesting within anwar's actions.

On the shadowy elements behind anwar and his so-called movements, check out the article below:

The foreign factor on April 28
By M. VEERA PANDIYAN, The Star, 10 May 12

Bersih’s peaceful supporters have the right to know the nexus between the ‘free and fair’ polls movement, the Pakatan Rakyat leader and foreign financial and political backers.

SOMETIMES, knowing too many people can be painful, especially when they try to draw you into political discussions in the most unlikely of places.

As a rule, I have always refrained from talking politics in restaurants or pubs but these days, it’s become a guideline that’s hard to keep.

It appears that, recently, almost everyone has become an expert on politics – even those who had never bothered to vote before, despite being in their 40s and 50s.

The problem with these new political pundits is that they want to convert you to their side and refuse to listen to alternate viewpoints.

There is no doubt that the April 28 Bersih 3.0 protest has created more such people besides widening the gap between supporters of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

The rally, the biggest that the country has seen so far, is also significant because most of those who turned up did so in peace, seeking free and fair elections.

Understandably, this group is upset that Opposition politicians hijacked the rally which turned ugly in the end.

A new website – www.dearambiga.com – says in its introduction: “We are angry. Why?

Because Bersih should be an NGO by the people, for the people of all races, areas and political views.

“But in Bersih 3.0, some Pakatan Rakyat bosses took advantage of our noble cause for their own political interests and benefit!”

The website has a clip of a heated exchange between independent filmmaker Benji Lim and Pakatan Rakyat’s Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over the hijacking of the rally.

It also has a petition titled “Time to stop Pakatan Rakyat hijacking our movement”, and urges visitors to e-mail Ambiga on the issue.

Perhaps, the peaceful people and those behind the website should take a closer look at allegations that bigger forces are behind the movement.

Tony Cartalucci of the Land Destroyer Report website, for example, says that Bersih’s leadership is being supported financially and politically by foreign organisations.

He cited a Malaysian Insider report on June 27, 2011 in which the Bersih leader admitted receiving money from two US organisations – the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) – for projects which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 Bersih 2.0 march.

However, he wrote that the NDI website revealed that funding and training had indeed been provided before the organisation removed the information and replaced it with a more benign version, purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.

He said the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to the movement suggested “something more sinister at play”.

“That Anwar himself was Chair-man of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined NED’s Democracy Award and a panelist at an NED donation ceremony – the very same organisation whose subsidiaries are funding and supporting Bersih – casts irrefutable doubt on their official agenda for clean and fair elections,” he wrote.

As such, Cartalucci said claims by Bersih supporters that Anwar had hijacked their movement rang hollow when looking at both his and Bersih’s entwined foreign financial and political backers.

He said with Bersih leaders’ recipients of aid from NED and OSI, and Anwar being a functionary of the IMF, it was certain that no matter how genuine Bersih’s rank and file might be, the fruits of their efforts would be the destabilisation and neo-recolonisation of a country that had fought long and hard to work its way out from Western imperialism.

If indeed the movement is about civil society’s rights to free and fair elections, Malaysians deserve to know more about these links.

But I doubt if people would rush to check the veracity of such reports or demand an explanation.

Blame it on what psychologists call “confirmation bias”. It is the propensity to look for what confirms one’s beliefs and ignore what contradicts them. It’s more pronounced when it comes to politics.

> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this quote by English philosopher William Penn: Passion is the mob of the man, that commits a riot upon his reason.

Was it all necessary in the first place? For anwar, it seems that the politics of anger is about to devour him alive. People were angry with the government back in 2008 during the nitwit and son-in-law's reign. Najib's diplomacy and radical transformations seemed to be in favor of Malaysians on the whole, much to anwar's ire. With much to gain from the programs and policies, anger has been long discarded and this put anwar's dream in jeopardy. For pakatan to keep their dreams of winning alive, they need people to remain angry. Spin and spin, lies after lies but nothing seem to work, and they had banked a lot on the bersih program.

Bersih 3.0 was supposed to be viral, or at least on paper, which was supposed to lead to a major revolt, overthrowing the government and implementing a regime change to which anwar would benefit, and it all started with a few simple instructions to his refreshing dessert, azmin ali just be fore anwar disappeared from view totally. It was the beginning of the biggest flop ever, and like the movie Heaven's Gate, it was hugely budgeted, massively constructed but tanked dismally. Anwar still wakes up every morning, asking himself, "Why am I still not a President?" The anger most Malaysians have now is with anwar and his pakatan for the massive destruction they had caused to the taxpayers.

Will his sponsors now commit to a bigger and more unscrupulous, more massive scaled riot called Bersih 4? Rumours has it that the next bersih riot will be held during the general election, with riots to be conducted if Pakatan loses. Will that happen? With the huge budgets they have distributed and failure after failure that were returned, would those NGOs dare to sponsor a regime change on behest of one chap who's lusting for power?

Hamas Rolling Over Anwar's Spins...Hamas Never Agreed With Anwar's Stand

I always remember my friends who were involved in volunteer aid groups, who spent time helping Palestinian refugees who had been victimized by the vile regime of the non-semitic zionist jews. Many of them keep telling how, everytime they tell the refugees that they are from Malaysia, the name Mahathir is uttered from their mouths. The same happened in Bosnia during the Balkan conflicts.

Tun Mahathir did so much that he can in standing up for the rights of the Palestinians and Bosnians. Even now, despite no more as a Prime Minister, he still dedicate a lot of his time for their plight. Undoubtedly, he is a celebrated statesman, although he himself never admitted to be one.

On the far side of the scale, we have the questionable anwar ibrahim. Since his release from prison, we have seen him working hard to pass himself as a statesman as well. He has even instructed his writers and bloggers to label him as a statesman, although nobody can be sure whether he's even fit to be an estates-man. Since Palestinians and Bosnians have no idea who he is, anwar dedicated himself as the champion for human rights, the new religion that is spreading fast around the world.

However, with his remarks about supporting Israel's security hitting Muslims in the face, anwar got more than what he bargained for. His name became famous, strangely not for the reasons he wished. Palestinians now know his name, though it can be assumed that they wish they never heard it. Anwar's name was even celebrated by Jerusalem Post, while Muslims were shocked and appalled. Well, I guess that's why sometimes you have to be careful with what you wish for, you might just get it albeit on the wrong end of the spectrum.

I have written, earlier this week, on anwar's supposed meeting with Hamas and sharing the same stand (article here ) Anwar has claimed that his stand, based supposedly on Ismail Haniyeh's statement, was understood and shared by Hamas. Given the timing and the events happening, it never really made sense. Let me recount them in chronological order:

2006 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was about to become the Palestinian Prime Minister, was quoted by Washington Post as saying:

“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognize them.”

2006 (a day later) - Ismail Haniyeh refuted the interview, saying that Washington Post misquoted him as he never made any statement saying that he will recognize Israel as a state. In short, the supposed stand stated by Washington Post never existed.

26 January 2012 - Anwar made his famour remark on his support for Israel - and starts using the Washington Post misquoted article as the basis of his stand

Early February 2012 - Hamas and Fatah signs and endorses an agreement in Doha, reconciling after years of conflict. Agreement stipulates only ruling and administrative details with nothing pointing to any stages or intentions of recognizing Israel as a state whatsoever.

11 February 2012 - Anwar Ibrahim's blog released 2 pictures showing him meeting the Hamas Leader, Khalid Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi. No details were given, and no other media in the world reported the meeting. Anwar's supporters mostly assume and claim that this is the meeting where anwar explained his stand, which is purportedly "in line" with the stand taken by Hamas on Israel.

11 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Iran, announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel

14 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh and Hamas officials conveyed their shock and dismay to anwar's support for Israel through Nasharuddin Mat Isa, MP for Bachok. Message was conveyed to him in Kuwait.

21 February 2012 - Anwar met with nik aziz, and during interview, he reiterated his stand, quoting almost all the points based on the Washington Post misreporting. In fact, he used the misquoted Washington Post report to justify his stand.

The update that burst anwar's bubbles is that Hamas, through the deputy chairman of its political bureau Dr Mousa Abu Marzook, denied sharing a similar stand as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who supports the security of Israel. (Full report here )

Dr Mousa also said Hamas will never recognise the Zionist regime as its existence is invalid.

Should anwar reiterate on somebody missing the part about "contingents" or "stages", let it be known that Dr Mousa has simply stated, "In any case, Hamas will not recognise Israel.” Period!

So what was anwar's meeting with Khaled Mashaal and Sheikh Yusoff Qaradawi all about? With their extreme stand, especially by Qaradawi on Israel and anybody who supports Israel, I don't think they will take anwar's stand kindly, let alone his claim that the stand was based on Hamas'.

Anwar's so-called human rights stand has so far taken him to Malaysia's dark alleys so far. His support for Lesbians, Gays, Bi-sexual and Transgendered, and now for Israel, has drawn fire from the Muslim community not just from Malaysia. Of course, by doing so, he has drawn himself as the darling of the west. It matters so much to him about the security of Israel, but not to the genocide brought about by the descendents of the tribe who were locked away behind a wall of iron and copper between the two ranges, who tried to pass themselves off as semites.

Let's face it: Tun Mahathir was branded as "anti-semitic" for his "Jews kill by proxy" statement. Even that label was ridiculous as only 21% of jews in Israel are semitic, while the rest of the semitic world are the Arabs. Anwar ranted during the Freedom Flotilla rally on the cruelty of Israel, yet bundles off to meet up jewish lobbyists in US to apologize and get support.

Anwar's statement of defence for the pro-Israel was riddled with pot-holes. It never made sense how leaders of Hamas with extreme views, such as killing any person who supports Israel, can even share and support anwar's position, and how anwar claimed that the stand was Hamas'. If it were, then Ismail Haniyeh wouldn't have announced that Hamas WILL NEVER recognize Israel during his visit to Iran shortly after that.

The jig is up, anwar. Where will he go from here? Many are betting that anwar will be spinning stories such as:
1) UMNO paid Hamas to say that statement
2) Hamas' policies/stand changed after he met them
3) Dr Mousa did not read anwar's whole statement
4) It was not Dr Mousa who made the statement, but an actor paid by UMNO
5) Hamas is like UMNO
etc etc...

I wonder how many times anwar has bamboozled Qaradawi into defending him since the famous "Qaradawi defended Anwar" vcd a few years back.

But who cares what anwar will spin. His spin on his pro-Israel statement has so far reached its end of its tether. Even before Dr Mousa's statement, it can be detected from their spins on how stressful it has become for pro-pakatan bloggers to defend anwar on this issue.

I am sure anwar and his cohorts are much busier, trying to spin Dr Mousa's statement, trying to sift through Tun Mahathir's letters so that they can twist it around, look for major plots to clear the "your-wife-is-my-sleeping-partner" badrul aming. We also understand that a major shipment of omega-sized panadols are being shipped to their office every now and then...well, at least they don't need lubricants.

Well, I have always noticed how anybody who has a scandal and issues that can threaten anwar's position "vanish" until such time. With Hamas still shocked and upset over anwar's statement, maybe anwar should just disappear...

Anwar Met Hamas? When Did Who Say What?

It all began with his statement to the Wall Street Journal:

"I support all efforts to protect the security of the state of Israel," said Mr. Anwar, although he stopped short of saying he would open diplomatic ties with the Jewish state, a step which he said remains contingent on Israel respecting the aspirations of Palestinians. Malaysia has consistently refrained from establishing diplomatic relations with Israel, although limited commercial ties exist between private companies in the two countries.
Full article here

From his statement above, it can be clearly seen that anwar is a proponent of the "two-state solution", which has been championed by the west, whereby 2 states will be recognized, Palestine and Israel.

Anwar was quoted as saying that he had explained to pas spiritual leader, n.ajis what he had explained to the leader of Hamas, Khaled Mashal during his meeting with Khaled and Sheikh Yusuf Qardhawi.


In short he stated that he met Khaled Mashaal and Khaled understood that Israel will only be recognized once all the contingents or pre-requisites are honored, or obeyed.

It should be a nice ending with anwar meeting the top leader of Hamas and Qardawi, we were even treated with nice pictures of anwar and the two leaders. In fact, all of these would be a very sweet ending to the whole "Anwar-pro-Israel" statement that he made to the Wall Street Journal.

Anwar posted on his blog, 2 pictures of him meeting Khaled Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusof Qardawi but kept mum on what were discussed. Other pro-anwar blogs followed suit with the pictures, but with no explanation. It's very strange that no media in Palestine and the world reported or mentioned this meeting in their newspapers, television, radio and/or their on-line publications. We spent hours searching the net for any news on the meeting itself and/or what they discussed about.

All searches on the net on anwar meeting Hamas leaders only return to anwar's blog. So, how come only anwar's blog claimed that he met Khaled Mashal without anydescription of what transpired? To say that all other medias in the world were on leave is highly speculative. When exactly did they meet?

We find it bizarre: when anwar stated his infamous remarks of supporting the security of Israel, it was reported on a global scale. The Islamic world views it as a sort of a death wish on anwar's part. Anwar should be pleased, after years of self proclaiming himself as a statesman, he finally got a reaction like one. The man stirred the Muslim world, and yet when he meets Hamas leaders, nobody bothers to report on the situation. In fact, no where can be found that Hamas met, discussed or even agreed with anwar's stand.

So, what did anwar claim he told n.ajis? Basically, what he claimed that a view shared by Hamas and himself: Anwar said he had explained that his stand on Israel is consistent with that of the Palestinian political factions Hamas and Fatah.

"I feel good as I could explain. In the end I said I follow the desires of Hamas and Fatah and what was negotiated among them in Doha two weeks ago," he said.


Anwar also, in the video above, quoted Ismail Haniyeh, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority representing Hamas:


“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognize them.”


Anwar also claims that the Hamas leader is clear on his stand and understands it.

We have searched media archives on the net looking for this, as we could not find this stand made by either Hamas, but we did find that the quote was made by Ismail Haniyeh in 2006, just days before becoming the Prime Minister, which was reported by The Washington Post. (An copy still available here)

However, a day later, Ismail Haniyeh made a statement that Washington Post misquoted him; that he never made any statement or has any intention of recognizing Israel. Full article here 

Alleviating anwar's problem, on 11th of February 2012, while in Iran, Ismail Haniyeh announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, full article here 

How could anwar claim that what he has explained is the stand that Hamas took, when Ismail Haniyeh himself refuted it? Whose stand did he share, Hamas or Washington Post? How come he used a refuted 6-year old interview as his basis?

Does N.ajis share his view on the "two state solution"? This report clears the air, here

So, anwar, when did who say what? His interview in the video above clearly shows his support for a two state solution, a stand that Hamas clearly condemn. Did anwar actually explain his stand to Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi? If he did, I'm surprised anwar got back to Malaysia fully intact. Here's part of a profile on Qardhawi:

Qaradawi similarly expressed his desire to see a "conquered" Jerusalem in a January 24, 2011, fatwa in which he negated Jewish attachment to Jerusalem and stated that it is the duty of Muslims to"defend" Jerusalem with "their lives, their money and all they possess, or else they will be subject to Allah's punishment."


This fatwa is part of Qardhawi's long record of inciting violence against Jews and Israel. During a sermon that aired on the Arabic satellite channel Al-Jazeera TV on January 28, 2009, Qaradawi told his audience, "I will shoot Allah's enemies, the Jews, and they will throw a bomb at me, and thus I will seal my life with martyrdom." In another sermon on January 9, 2009, Qaradawi lashed out at Jews, including calling on God to "kill them, down to the very last one."


He has also refused to dialogue with Jews. Qardawi declined to participate in the 8th annual conference organized by the Doha International Center for Interfaith Dialogue because of the participation of Jews.


In a statement released by Qaradawi's office, he reportedly said, "How can we conduct a dialogue in a time when they seize lands, shed blood, burn farms, and demolish houses? Palestine's conundrum has to be resolved first before we sit together at the same table."
(Reference taken from Dr. MIM, here)

Even anwar's attempt to have the contingents honored before giving recognition to the state of Israel contravenes the 1988 fatwa issued by 66 mufti that any action that gave recognition to Israel's existence is an act that opposes Islam, or does anwar really not bothered? Doesn't his action also swipe Sheikh Yusoff Qardhawi in his face?

Anwar claimed that his stand is in-line with Hamas and Fatah's stand when he met the groups in Doha two weeks earlier. The Hamas-Fatah Deal signed and endorsed in Doha has nothing about a "two-state solution" nor any mention or intention of recognizing Israel as a state. The Doha Agreement by Hamas and Fatah is a move to reconciliate both parties after years of conflict. (Read here) In fact, check out the Hamas Charter here. No where we can find anything on the terms and recognition.

For Hamas and Fatah to reach and seal the agreement in Doha, they would have to be unanimous in their stand and secisions. Any terms or attempts to recognize Israel as a state in a slightest way will end up with more hostility between the two groups. Do you think any of these 2 share the stand that anwar claim?

What was the point of accusing Malaysian media of twisting his statement on his support for Israel by deleting the word "contingent" when anwar himself twisted and used a misquoted statement made 6 years ago by Ismail Haniyeh to The Washington Post, and disguising it to make it look as if it is the stand stated by Hamas?

Despite all that anwar claimed, we understand that the Prime Minister of Palestine Authority, Ismail Haniyeh was outraged and saddened by anwar's support to Israel's security. How did we know that? Well, Ismail Haniyeh was told by YB Nasharuddin Mat Isa,when he met with Haniyeh in Kuwait. Nasharuddin was there as Pengerusi Pentadbiran Yayasan al-Quds Malaysia, a Malaysian foundation in aid of the Palestinian plight, chaired by YB Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir.

Let's simplify all of this chronologically, so that even Mahfuz can understand:

2006 - Ismail Haniyeh was quoted by Washington Post saying:

“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognise them.”


2006 (a day later) - Ismail Haniyeh refuted the interview, saying that Washington Post misquoted him as he never made any statement saying that he will recognize Israel as a state.

26 January 2012 - Anwar made his famour remark on his support for Israel - and starts using the Washington Post misquoted article as the basis of his stand

Early February 2012 - Hamas and Fatah signs and endorses an agreement in Doha, reconciling after years of conflict. Agreement stipulates only ruling and administrative details with nothing pointing to any stages or intentions of recognizing Israel as a state whatsoever.

11 February 2012 - Anwar Ibrahim's blog released 2 pictures showing him meeting the Hamas Leader, Khalid Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi. No details were given, and no other media in the world reported the meeting. Anwar's supporters mostly assume and claim that this is the meeting where anwar explained his stand, which is purportedly "in line" with the stand taken by Hamas on Israel.

11 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Iran, announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, putting more holes into anwar's claims

14 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh and Hamas officials conveyed their shock and dismay to anwar's support for Israel through Nasharuddin Mat Isa, MP for Bachok. Message was conveyed to him in Kuwait.

21 February 2012 - Anwar met with nik aziz, and during interview, he reiterated his stand, quoting almost all the points based on the Washington Post misreporting. In fact, he used the misquoted Washington Post report to justify his stand.

Again, anwar, when did who say what? Why was it so difficult for you to retract the Israel support statement? I guess to be the one-eyed's bitch is better than being a group of displaced and oppressed people who are fighting with their lives for their freedom. Why? Hey, the one-eyed's organizations can one day make him a Prime Minister!

It seems that n.ajis distanced himself from anwar's statement, and yet pas remains in the totally misleading pakatan. According to anwar, the pas spiritual leader accepted his stand. One question arises: does anybody in pas ever make references and research over what anwar stated? If anybody has any reference that Hamas did actually make their stand as what anwar claim, please send me a link.

Looking at how the religious ones are abandoning pas, I wonder if n.ajis will be the solitary figure to demand retractions and apologies from anwar over the Israel remark? Or keep himself quiet in fear of reprisals from anwar followers in pas? 


Anwar might need to explain more, such as when was his meeting with the Hamas leader and maybe some clarification from them. In the meantime, can we send somebody to meet up with Hamas and/or Ismail Haniyeh and clarify anwar's story...or shall I say, work of fiction?

Israel...Who Are You Actually?

Will there be anything that surprises us with the most recent news on how Israel commandos attacking humanitarian aid ships in international waters? If United Nations can do something about it, Israel can always say, "Go and screw your Schwartz!!!" They're right, though, have we ever seen UN or anybody ever take on the rogue nation of Israel? Well, US politicians who would like to keep a longer shelf life for their career usually avoid this.

Tun Dr Mahathir was visibly shaken and angered at this action. For the first time ever, UMNO and PAS came out separately, but with a unified call for the release of the Malaysians involved and to the people of Palestine, who are supposed to receive the aids. Tun and various other NGOs have concentrated their efforts for more than a year for this humanitarian aid, and this is the worst possible outcome that we read: A bunch of highly trained commandos, sneaking into the flotilla and opened fire on sleeping civilians, and later claims that they were attacked by ship crews who were armed with sharp objects. Gee, must be that newly-sharpened pencil the captain has for his navigational map. Since the flotilla is towed away, we can be rest assured that these possible outcomes will surface, individually and/or separately:
1) A large cache of weapons and ammunition is found
2) Components/Parts of weapons of mass destruction is found in the flotilla
3) As an ending: all humanitarian aids were already spoiled before it reached their port, so, Palestinians will not get any aid.

There are already news pages, blogs, Facebook pages, Twiters etc etc on this abominable unjustifiable action of Israel, I would not act the same way or we might just get very emotional.

Who are these people? Well, history dictates to us that Israelites came from the family tree of Sam or Sem bin Noh, making them Semitics, through Abraham. Wait, you say? Ibrahim's eldest son is Ismail, you say? Yes, that makes Ishmaelite (Arabs) Semitics too as well as the Israelites, who descend through Isaac (Ishak), the younger brother. That's why Israel never dares to call their brethren (the Arabs) anti-Semitic.

The Israelites were "the chosen one" back then, with long line of prophets, a prosperous kingdom, a fertile and industrious nation, as long as they toe the line on God's teachings. But arrogance keeps blinding them, and this led to self-righteousness, blasphemous acts, deviance, defiance and infighting amongst themselves. In the end, as usual, the Israelites became a tribe that has gone astray from God's path.

Sura 17:4
"And We [Allah] gave (clear) warning to the children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!"

As a result, Jerusalem was destroyed by Babylonians at first, and the second, bigger destruction was brought by Rome where all inhabitants of Jerusalem were cast out. But God did promise their return to this land though:

Qur'an 17:104: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him:  Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter  cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

1947 saw the creation of Israel with Jews from all over the world landing in Jerusalem, reclaiming their holy land. Why did I say Jews instead of Israelites? We'' see later. There is condition given to the return to the holy city. The Holy Qur'an states that:

“There is a ban on a town (i.e. Jerusalem) which We destroyed (and whose people were then expelled) that they (i.e. the people of the town) can never return (to reclaim that town as their own) until Gog and Magog are released and they spread out in all directions (thus taking control of the world while establishing the Gog and Magog world-order).”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah’, 21:95-6)
(Imran Hoesin's comments are in brackets)

After the final destruction of Jerusalem, the land became witness to the absence of Israelites for the next many, many years. End of story? Not so...

Nearly all religions in the world dictate that there are beings or entities known as Gog and Magog or Yakjuj and Makjuj. Many ulamas theorized that these 2 are groups of people/tribes. For that, let's take a quick look at Surah Al-Kahfi, with notes by Imam Imran Hoesin:

“(And he marched on) till, when he reached (a pass) between the two mountain-barriers, he found before them a people who could scarcely understand anything spoken (i.e. any utterance in his language).

(Eventually, when they were able to communicate with each other) they said, “O Dhul Qarnain! Behold, Gog and Magog are corrupting (and destroying) this land (in which we live). May we offer (to pay) you tribute on the condition that you build a barrier (saddan) between us and them (to protect us from them)?”

He answered, “That wherein my Lord-God has so securely established me is better (than any tribute that you could offer me); hence, do but help me with (your) manpower, (and) I shall fill up a barrier between you and them!”

“Bring me ingots of iron!” Then, after he had (piled up the iron and) filled the gap between the two shell-shaped mountainsides, he said, “(Light a fire and) ply your bellows!” At length, when he had made it (glow like) fire, he commanded: “(Now place the copper in the fire and then) bring me molten copper, which I may pour upon it . . . ”

“And thus (the barrier was built and Gog and Magog) were unable to scale it, and neither were they able to penetrate it (by digging through it. As a consequence, mankind was safe from their attacks).”

(Dhul Qarnain) said, “(Our success in constructing this barrier) is mercy from my Lord-God! Yet when the time appointed by my Lord-God has come (i.e. the Last Age), He would destroy/demolish/level it (i.e. make flat) (the natural implication being that He would reduce the barrier to ruins): and my Lord-God’s promise (i.e. warning) would have come true . . . ”

“ . . . and on that Day We shall (begin a process which would eventually) cause some of them to surge like waves (that merge with or crash against) others of them and the trumpet (of judgment) would be blown, and We shall gather them all together.”

“ . . . and on that Day (when the time comes for the horrendous Gog vs Magog clash to take place and for Dukhan or smoke in the form of nuclear mushroom clouds to appear in the sky) We shall place hell, for all to see, before those who denied the truth . . . ”

“ . . . they (would be a people) whose eyes had been veiled against any remembrance of Me because they could not bear to listen (to the word of truth).”

(Surah Al-Kahfi:93 - 101)
(Imran Hoesin's comments are in brackets)

Islamic scholars and historians state that Gog and Magog dwell behind the Caucasus Range, known as Scythians, a horribly barbaric tribe that literally destroys every civilization that they attack. The Scythian Babylonian attack on Israel reduced the empire to rubbles. The tribe also has a horrific measure of spoils to be shared: the more enemy scalps you bring home, the more share of the spoils you get. A Just King appeared, completing his empire and even allowing the Israelites (who were enslaved by Babylonians) to return home. He traveled to the farthest regions of his empire, first towards the Black Sea, then towards Caspian. Finally, at the foot of the Caucasus Range, he was met tribes of Georgians. Georgians were not a

part of his middle-eastern empire, but as the King is known for his just, they implored upon him to protect them from the tribe known as Gog and Magog who created so much mischief on earth.

The Just King agreed, and as Georgians at the time were well known blacksmiths, together they built a wall (like a dam) out of iron and copper. This in turn, blocks the Daryal Gorge from being used by Gog and Magog, as it is the shortest was out instead of crossing the mountain or going around the Black sea.

Many scholar believe that "The time appointed" mentioned is the completion of Islam by Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) where the barrier was demolished/leveled, unleashing the tribe into the rest of the population in the world, especially in Russia and Europe, where they inter-married and blended with them. Today, most of the western world populations are identified as "Caucasian." There are also those who remained in the Russian region and converted into Judaism, and called themselves Khazars (also known as Ashkenaz). These people later forcefully migrated into Eastern Europe and other parts of Russia. Mind you that these are converts and they have nothing to do with the Semitic Israelites.

The Israelites and Jews were always welcomed in the Islamic world; this is evident during the Spanish Inquisition where Moslems and Jews were persecuted by the Catholics in Spain. Turkey in Europe and the Middle East became their safe haven. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and finally, the creation of Israel, brokered by US and UK, finalized the prophecy when the Gog and Magog who, some who became Jews,

and those who interbred with the other European tribes, returned the fragmented Israelites to the town that they were expelled from because of their lack of obedience and piety to the true path of God. The real Israelites comprises of only 21% of the population of Israel while the rest are the Judaism converts who were scattered throughout Eastern Europe and Russia.

The media has long been manipulated to state that anybody who speaks against Jews is anti-Semitic. The true definition of anti-Semitic is not "Anti-Jews" but "anti the children of Sam bin Noh", which will include Israelites and Arabs together, as they are children of the Prophet Abraham.

The godless, modern Israel has proven to the world that they can do anything they want, anybody try to resist, then US and UK will be flying in with blazing guns. Is it a surprise? Who actually funded US and UK during the Second World War? Were 6 million Jews killed during that time, or is it slightly over 200,000?
Well, it is a small number of sacrifices needed to create sympathy for the Jews and grab Jerusalem. But we know that Israel will never stop there. They believe that God ordained them a land from the Nile to the Euphrates. So, what's on their agenda next? They're still on the road to Pax Judaica.

What am I trying to say? Well, basically, 2 tribes of people; one who keeps deviating from the righteous path, ignores God's orders, creates false prophets and slays true prophets and the other, destroyer of countless civilization, converted, feels that they are more Semitic than the former, and still destroys civilizations in a more cryptic manner. These are the people we are condemning and urging the United Nations to condemn their violent action on the Freedom Flotilla? Like they care...





To the families whose spouse/children/parents are involved in the Freedom Flotilla, we offer our prayers for their safety and safe return soon. We also pray for the oppressed Palestinians who still await in vain for the humanitarian aid.