Gaddafi Is Dead, Anwar Ass-Kicked, NWO Is Coming - Bugger Me...

Wild, bloody and violent; that's one way to describe how Gaddafi died. Whatever his sins are, he'll be answering to God when the time comes. For the people who killed him, they'll be bragging on how they squeezed the life out of Gaddafi and justify it, but before God, they might just plead for mercy over murder.

Muammar Gaddafi is the longest reigning non-royal leader in the world in the 20th century. He deposed King Idris 1 in a bloodless coup de tat in 1969, led Libya to an economic boom from oil sales in the late 1970s, defied the west in 1980s and paid the price in 2011. It must be said that, Gaddafi has a not-that-special place amongst the Syeds and Shariffs around the world: Gaddafi deposed Idris 1 of Libya, who is a Sayyid of the Sanoussi family, descended from the same line as the Syeds and Shariffs. There were stories of Gaddafi desecrating the tombs of the Sanoussi family, but I don't know as I could not find any facts on that. The Sanoussis emerged as the family who strengthened Islamic values in Libya back in the 18th century, and they led the Libyans against the invading French and Italy. Fighting Italy alone cost around 250,000 to 300,000 Libyan deaths, which ended in 1943. The Libyans still affiliate themselves to the Sanoussis, even during the uprising in 2011. That definitely be a balancing factor.

Somewhere in the land of the people who descended from the tribe who were detained behind the iron wall between the two ranges, they'll be applauding and slapping each others' backs for a job well done. The west has made all too many attempts to get rid of Gaddafi. Yes, I know what you're thinking: it was the west who put him on the top, but Gaddafi, back in the 1980s defied the west, and that is unforgivable. You don't invest in a chap only to have him hurling a bag of crap at you. No, no, no, that's intolerable. The punishment for these type of people and those who have outlived their usefulness is usually a mess.

It must be said that getting rid of Gaddafi has been very economical for the west. This time, they don't have to use assassins like they used to back in 1950s and 60s. No need to send air-strikes like in 1980s. All they need to do is monitor, have their people instigate the already-furious Libyans and place their whole support. The people of Libya carried out the tasks for the west, and they don't even have an inkling about what lies beyond it. The west suffered no losses, but thousands of Libyans perished battling each other.

So, now that Muammar Gaddafi is gone, the Libyans will settle down, have free and fair elections, choose a leader smongst themselves, rebuild their lives, country and economy and live happily ever after. Of course, that's what most western newspapers are saying, but in reality, we know too well that this will never happen. Just like when we thought when Israel granted autonomy to Palestine to self rule will bring peace, it brought only further splits and in-fighting between political factions. That will happen to Libya. There will always be pro-Gaddafi factions causing trouble and the anti-Gaddafi factions will soon be split into several factions such as the pro-transitional government factions and pro-Sanoussis. The leader? Well, it depends on who bows to the west first. Anyway, the Libyans are still out for blood as they continue hunting for Gaddafi's son, who managed to escape. Maybe once they kill him, the country will go back to normal again...and camels will have wings...

Leaders like the late Muammar Gaddafi and Hosni Mubarak should recognize why their subjects or citizens must be held as a priority. Basic democracy and human rights should be recognized and a free and fair election must be held. Failure or refusing to recognize even a single basic human right can lead to so many implications, depending on the significance of the country to the west. If your country produces bananas instead of oil, the west might be too busy on other matters.

But there are still problems when you have power-lust people like anwar ibrahim acting as if Malaysia is like Libya. They demanded human rights and free and fair elections in a country that, you guessed it, have been practicing human rights and free and fair elections for the past 50 years. He has gone so far to instruct actors to portray as if there are police brutality and cruel and barbaric acts against him just to get some nice juicy pictures needed for his western friends to sell to the world. Since the back and front pusher like anwar is always an actor, I wonder who the actual director is? It seems that anwar never cared what his sponsors are up to, all he cares about, is getting to power. That might just spell doom for us.

I wonder if anwar and pakatan ever realize Gaddafi's fate can be theirs if they ever defy their sponsors? The west can invest in them and they can get rid of them in many ways. Maybe anwar's poor acting over Freedom Flotilla protest deserves only a slap on the wrist, but a bigger defiance might just be too fatal...well, anwar has met, bowed, groveled and pled for mercy from them already. With anwar's sodomy case in the fore, sex video in the rear, the unseen hands might just had enough of him.

In the meantime, we should always remember, the chaos in Libya and other Middle eastern countries that led to Gaddafi's death has been brought to you by the same groups that gave us the deaths of Palestinians and Bersih 2.0, all for the benefit for a New World Order.

What do the riots in Middle East have to do wit NWO? Everything. The NWO never meant a free country running their own business and taking care of its own people. It means that all nations must bow to one, failure to do so will be dealth with severely. Imagine how easy for a country like US to have all leaders of the Islamic countries bowing down before them, carrying out thir orders and live and die only for them. One of the basic strategy they will need is definitely check and balance.

For a New World Order, check and balance is highly crucial. Imagine how the modern gadgetery of US can't get rid of the Talibans? Can they really? But it is just the simple equation: US placed Hamid Kharzai at the top, if Kharzai ever decide to defy them, the Taliban can always "take over" Afghanistan again, and he might just meet an unpleasant end in their hands. If the new leader of Libya fails to comply with the west, other factions can take over and so on and so forth.

We have been watching a major part of history in making. It is part of the creation of the long-dreamed New World Order. In its process, more heads will roll, more blood will flow.

For those who had enjoyed their romps during Bersih 2.0, they should take note that what is happening in Libya and other Middle East countries is their future if they do not wake up. Yes, we understand that the money from the jewish sponsored NED is sweet, but the lives lost because of it is not. The money for bersih and the money to create chaos in other countries usually come from the same bank. For them, the might just wake up from their sweet slumber one day, only to be greeted by anwar, "Welcome to the New World Order." It'll be too late by then.

We have to understand that Islamic countries are destined to  slide further and further down the drain by the infighting until the day the Mahdi arrives. It has also been proven that pakatan components like pas, who tells anybody who who listens, that they are the most Islamic in Malaysia, never bother about the upkeeping the faith among the ummah when they never bothered to support HIMPUN. It has been foretold, but then again, who ever listens nowadays?