Hansard shows opposition supported PTPTN - Thasnks To The Mole

This is an excellent article from The Mole on the PTPTN issue:

Hansard shows opposition supported PTPTN
The Mole Wednesday, April 18, 2012

KUALA LUMPUR: The Parliament's hansard showed DAP Adviser Lim Kit Siang and his son Guan Eng had supported the bill of the National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN), when it was tabled in the parliament in 1997.

The hansard, dated 14 May, 1997 stated that, Kit Siang and Guan Eng had both proposed that a higher allocation be provided for the PTPTN instead of RM100 million startup as proposed in the bill.

The hansard reads: "(Tuan Lim Kit Siang [Tanjong]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya mengalu-alukan Rang Undang Undang Perbadanan Tabung Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional untuk memperuntukkan satu tabung bagi membenarkan anak-anak kita berpeluang melanjutkan pendidikan tinggi dan menyediakan bantuan kewangan melalui pinjaman pendidikan atau selainnya kepada pelajar yang menuntut di institusi-institusi pengajian tinggi.(Tuan Lim Kit Siang [Tanjong]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, I welcome the Bill of the National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) to provide the opportunity for our children to pursue higher education and provide financial assistance through loans or otherwise to the education of students who are studying in institutions of higher learning.")

The hansard had stated that Kit Siang had said that the RM100 million startup allocation for the PTPTN as contained in the bill was insufficient and it should be increased to RM500 million.

His son Guan Eng was reported in the hansard of proposing a higher quantum than that by his father.

Guan Eng, was recorded as saying: "RM100 million is not enough. If the government is really sincere, they should consider to start at least with the amount of RM1 billion".

The bill was then tabled by Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak who was the Minister of Education.

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who had raised issue with the PTPTN and had promised to abolish it if the opposition takes over the nation's rule, was the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister when the bill was tabled in 1997.

In fact, he was the acting Prime Minister then.

This was pointed out by Dr Mahathir who said he was on a two-month leave when the bill was tabled and Anwar was then the acting Prime Minister.

Dr Mahathir in a Bernama report, said: "That is Anwar. He doesn't know what is he talking about; he is forgetful".

Blogger Ruang Bicara Faisal pointed out that Anwar held the post of acting Prime Minister from May 19 until July 26 1997, adding that Anwar should have cancelled the plan to establish the fund if he had doubts about it.

"At that time Anwar had the power as a Finance Minister who gives approval to PTPTN to start the operation, he also had the power as a Deputy Prime Minister and more importantly, he had the power as the acting Prime Minister. Even Dr Mahathir had said that Anwar had the full authority as a Prime Minister.

"And now he tries to influence the public that the PTPTN is a cruel act?," the blogger said.

Anwar's promise to abolish the PTPTN had led to a group of university students from the Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia to organise a demonstration at Dataran Merdeka last Saturday.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin, as reported by Bernama, said students involved in the demonstration should repay the loan to prove that they do not want the PTPTN loan scheme.

"Universiti Selangor (Unisel), owned by the PKR-led Selangor state government, must also declare whether the PTPTN should be abolished," he said.

P.S.: Well, every time there's something that is beneficial being politicized, you can almost always expect that it will be from those three: Larry, Curly & Moe.

Et in nomine Patris et Filii et sancti bos

Mansuh PTPTN Demo - Proof of Unintelligence...

I was reading some books which begs the absolute answer to the boggling question, "Are there any intelligent beings out there?" However, whenever the name of mahfuz and mat sapu crop up, I must say that there's not much intelligent beings here on earth in the first place. Worse of all, after reading about the failed demonstration of 200 or so organized by the jewish sponsored pakatan rakyat, the event became a stronger proof that, despite some of them attend universities, it doesn't mean that they're intelligent either.

The Malays always have a good saying, and one of them is "Beri betis, nak peha". where in basic understanding displays the never-ending unsatisfaction of one (or more) even he/she/they have been given something beneficial. In this case, the PTPTN. The government has allocated billions to ensure Malaysians, especially the Malays, every opportunity to extend their studies, they made an issue of their student loans.

The Malays of the peninsular have always been the lucky ones: they have the government giving them almost every assitance in so many things in their lives. This is not surprising, the coming of the British brought in mass immigration of Chinese and Indians, with the former dominating the business power in the country. The Malays who retreated more and more became very deprived of so many things, and were in danger of being a minority in their own land. Even the communists, during the Emergency, found the Malays to be very annoying, always refusing to discard their religion, culture and family for the sake of communism. This usually is resolved with the communists venting their frustrations on the Malays: murder and property destruction. The British were happy enough to teach the Malays to be peons, drivers and servants. They also teach the younger Malays on how to do what their fathers did slightly better. In short, if a father is a fisherman, his son will be taught to be a slightly better fisherman while the riches of Malaya was spirited away across the ocean and the economy was dominated by the immigrants. Not surprisingly, there were more Chinese and Indians from Malaya went to universities compared to the Malays. Even the early days of Universiti Malaya in Singapore in the 1950s saw a small number of Malays.

After independence, the government continued scholarship programs on a bigger scale, although being a 3rd world country, the budget was not that much to send many students to study. The 1980s and 90s saw a drastic change where more and more Malays getting into universities, locally and internationally. MARA, Petronas, Sime Darby, JPA and even TNB were giving out student loans and scholarships to those who met the grade. With the growing numbers of local universities, such as UiTM, the future of the Malays in achieving a bright future seem to be promising.

The setting up of Perbadanan Tabung Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional (PTPTN) was made in 1997, during the dire financial crisis. Ironically, the body was incorporated during anwar's tenure as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. Now that he's not the Finance Minister anymore, and in his campaign to spread discontent among the population of Malaysia, anwar and pakatan rakyat want to abolish the PTPTN scheme.

What I cannot figure out is what the mechanism is anwar basing himself with? True that his scheme will depend on Petronas' revenue, but how much it will hurt the other social spectrum covered by the revenue has never been satisfactorily explained. Looking at the speed of how they demolished Selangor's coffers, I dread to think of how fast pakatan's grabby hands will empty the Petronas accounts. Will that scholarship to thousands of students per semester per year take its toll on other things such as, say, benefits for the disabled (OKU)? Or will anwar remove subsidies on all controlled items in Malaysia, or worse?

But hey, I guess it should be a good move. Let's use Petronas for that purpose, and that purpose alone...yeah, right, like he would. If ever Petronas runs out of cash, there's always anwar's favorite piggy bank, the IMF, or even World Bank. Better still, why not let tiang chua reprise his job as the go-between for anwar and soros and get more cash. There's more from NED, NDI and even USAID. What's to be worried about? Anwar is already heavy in debt after all the provisions given that led to failures upon failures. What, you think the millions of RM provided to start a revolt via bersih and the pitiful demonstration today comes free of charge? Just like PTPTN, the "loans" from the foreign NGOs need to be repaid as well, and unlike PTPTN, he will not be paying them only by cash.

The absence of thousands of university students, and the attendant of less than 1% of the targeted spectators have definitely frustrated tiang chua, nurul izzah and even anwar. However, this has proven that most university students are level headed, and at the moment, making their parents extremely proud by studying. There are also reports by those who attended that they doubt that 40% of the attendants were even students. Maybe anwar should have offered a higher pay for those people, then he might have more people coming in. One guy who attended stated that the pay was dreadful this time around. Maybe pakatan is trying to reserve their sponsored funds.

What's the most important issue here? As commented a pas member, "kalau tak mau mengaji keluag la, belambak lagi orang nak masuk." (If you don't want to study, get out; there are many more who wants to get in." It's a bizarre world: when one gets a place in a university, he works hard to get the PTPTN loan. When he graduates and gets a good paying job, the loan suddenly becomes a burden. Still, the government still proceeds to assist students who are in need without fail. Maybe they fail to understand that the money they pay is meant for younger generations when their turn comes.

For anwar and his pakatan, it has always been clear that he is only eyeing the PM's chair. How he gets it, well, it's no-holds barred, even if it means having students run a riot for him. His orchestrated demonstration today, just like his previously foreign-NGO-sponsored riots, failed miserably. In fact, this demonstration failed so exceptionally bad that nurul izzah and tiang chua never had any chance to fake anything, or provoke any police to get nice juicy pictures to their western media friends.

It's strange, when I was studying abroad, I did meet students from many different countries who were studying there on student loans, either from their government, organizations or even banks. They worked hard, most even taking part time jobs to cover daily personal expenses and studied even harder. Their lifestyle were very basic, no fancy stuff, most of their equipments such as tv, pc or cd players were bought used, usually from students who graduated and were leaving. I don't know whether they were top of their classes, but I do know they graduated. I kept in touch with some of them through Facebook, and found out that they're doing very well. One of them, Steve H., from New York, owns his own investment company and he told me that he finished repaying his loan about 10 years ago. He never regretted taking the loan and stated how the experience taught him independence and the value of money. Maybe the students, if there are any, spend their time and study wisely, practice an average lifestyle and spend less time politicking, maybe they'll learn that too.

Maybe it is time for those 200 or so get back to their studies...well, if all of them are students in the first place. You can use the money paid by the demo sponsors as pocket money or something more beneficial, like buying books. Think for a while, appreciate what you have been given which so many never had the chance 30 years before. It is bad enough that so many people are labelling the demo as "an excuse to do anything but study."

Anwar has so far attacked everything there is as listed and strategized by his jewsih-sponsored NGO friends, such as racialism, the police, the army, the Muslims, the electoral system, the Monarchy, the government's credibility, Najib's personality, and so far, anwar's losing more and more ground. What's next? Who knows, he's been shooting his own foot so far. Looking at the whole scenario again, the failed Mansuh PTPTN was extremely unnecessary, but hey, the budget has already been allocated by those people behind anwar, just like the upcoming bersih 3.0.

Support Bersih 3.0

The time has come; let's throw in our undivided support for the planned Bersih 3.0. Forget about from which jewish supremacy group the money is from, don't bring up the fact about NED and foreign NGOs who have painstakingly designed and strategized this event. Let's go and give our undying support. For that, I have completed a promotional video on why we should be there, at Dataran Merdeka on 28th of April 2012 for the event.



Bersih 3.0 - Leading Malaysia To A New Era Under....

A Friend of My Friend (Anwar) Is Our Friend...Or Do We See The Dark Of The Moon?

I have indeed missed a week or two of events in Malaysia due to my travels. Upon return and updating myself, a few reports caught my attention.

Pas' spiritual advisor was quoted as saying, that Islam does allow its followers to work together and/or have business relations as long as they have no bad or evil agenda behind it. (For complete article of this, please click here ) With certain rarity, I am bound to agree with this statement in general.

From the Holy Al-Qur'an, Hadith and history, we mostly distinguish the Jews as the Israelites, from the same Semitic line as the Arabs. By the time Muhammad S.A.W. began his mission in Mecca, there were several groups of "Arab Jews" in the Arabian Peninsular. Despite the majority being descendents of Israelites, there were a smattering of them comprising of Arabs who converted to Judaism before Islam. Most of these Arab Jews came to be there:

 * after the collapse of Kingdom of Judah in 586 BCE,
 * after the Roman conquest of Judea and the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 CE, exiles found a home in the desert,
 * being survivors of the Bar Kochba Revolt, in 135CE, who sought religious freedom in the Arabian desert rather than live under oppression by the Romans,
 * immigration, around 300 CE, by people who are known in Islamic literature as the Banu Aus and the Banu Khazraj who fled the Ghassanids in Syria.
 * migration from Judea into southern Arabian Peninsula to ride the ascent of the Himyarite Kingdom around 380 CE.

Other descendents of Israelites made their homes in other Arabic countries and even in north Africa. Their expulsions, again and again from Jerusalem or Bait-ul-Maqdis were the result of their arrogance and their intolerable attitude and disregard towards God and their blatant persecution of the Prophets appointed by God. This was made clear in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own);
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95)

There were conflicts before between the Jews of Mecca/Medina during Muhammad's prophethood. Bani Qaynuqa, for example, were expelled from Medina by Muhammad S.A.W. for breaking the treaty today known as The Constitution of Medina. Despite their early indifferent towards the Muslim world, for more than 1,000 years, Muslims have done business and even lived side-by-side with the Jews. In the past, we have even seen a few Jews involved in the administration or governance of Islamic countries in the Middle East and North Africa. When the Christians captured Jerusalem during the First Crusades in 1099, they went on a bloody rampage, where thousand of Muslims and Jews were massacred as the Christians have no idea how to distinguish between the two. The Jews who fled knew that as long as they stick with the Muslims, they will be safe.

With the collapse of Spanish Muslims Cordoba Caliphate , the Spaniards introduced the Spanish Inquisition in 1480 that saw thousands of Muslims and Jews in Spain tortured to death in order to force them to convert. Again, the Jews fled with the Muslims, mostlt to Turkey and other Islamic countries. Among the favorite methods used by the Inquisitors to detect the Muslims was serving pork at banquets as both Muslims and Jews are forbidden to eat them.

Today, these descendents of Israelites comprise only 20% or less of the population in the modern state of Israel. So, who are the biggest jewish population of Israel?

History notes a bizarre twist in the Israelites' fate and a decline in their fortunes. The Israelites' Kingdom in Jerusalem were destroyed by the combined forces of Babylonian and Scythian army under Nebuchadnezzar in 597BC. The Scythians did most of the destruction, leaving behind a completely destroyed nation, almost wiping its trace from the world.

The Scythians were a powerful group, originating from the northern part of the world, behind a great mountain range of the north, the Caucasus. They were very destructive in nature and caused a lot of death, misery and damage wherever they attack and pillage. Their only way in and out of their homeland is a pass between the two mountainous range. Manybiblical prophets wrote in their testaments of these people, one even referring them as "a boiling cauldron from the north." Scythians can trace their line back to Noah through Japeth or Yafet bin Noh.

Israelites were captured and brought to Babylon where the Israelites spent the next 57 years as slaves. When a just king, Dhul Qarnain (Dzulqarnain) conquered Babylon in 540BC, he proclaimed the freedom for Israelites whereby returning them to Jerusalem where they remained until they were expelled again by the Romans in 70CE.

The rampage and destruction brought on by the Scythians drummed fear into almost every civilization in the then-known world. Some Islamic scholars believe that it was the Georgians who met and implored help from the just king, Dhul Qarnain to stop these barbarians, despite not being part of his empire. The just king constructed a dam-like wall of iron and copper that cuts off the pass between the two range which disallowed the Scythians from going in or out to the then-known civilization.

They said, "O Dhul-Qarnayn, indeed Gog and Magog are [great] corrupters in the land. So may we assign for you an expenditure that you might make between us and them a barrier?" He said, "That in which my Lord has established me is better [than what you offer], but assist me with strength; I will make between you and them a dam. Bring me sheets of iron" - until, when he had leveled [them] between the two mountain walls, he said, "Blow [with bellows]," until when he had made it [like] fire, he said, "Bring me, that I may pour over it molten copper." So Gog and Magog were unable to pass over it, nor were they able [to effect] in it any penetration.

[Dhul-Qarnayn] said, "This is a mercy from my Lord; but when the promise of my Lord comes, He will make it level, and ever is the promise of my Lord true." And We will leave them that day surging over each other, and [then] the Horn will be blown, and We will assemble them in [one] assembly.
Surah Al-Kahfi 94-99

As time passes, the Scythians evolved and cultured themselves, officially embracing Judaism in the 8th century. Their kingdom was known as Khazaria. The attacks by the Russians drove the Khazars away into Europe where they blend in with the population, "surging over each other. Yes, I agree with some of the Islamic scholars that the iron and copper wall is no more. Is there any surprise that most white people are known as Caucasians? Despite the Jews flooding into eastern europe, the German Jews became quite dominant, especially the Ashkenazi Jews. Yiddish, which is a high german language of the German Jews, written in Hebrew alphabets became the almost official language of the non-Semitic European or Caucasian Jews.

The Caucasian jews replicated the Israelite jews so much, to a point of perfection, up to a point that they feel that they are Israelites and the land prmosed to Abraham's children is theirs, and theirs alone. The land stretches from the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. They were almost solely responsible for introducing usury-based systems in banking and insurance to Europe where it flourished. Migrations to the new world (USA) gave them more opportunities to control significant elements that will influence and shape the future, such as mass-media and the entertainment industry. The caucasian jews-controlled media manipulated the term Semitic to include them, and exclude the Arabs. Movie studios, controlled by these jews churned out movies which in the long run, plays into their favor, amplifying their manufactured wars on the plight of the Jews in Europe to gain sympathy. They loaned billions of dollars for US to fight the war, and in return, the British Mandate of Palestine fell into their hands.

Caucasian jews were already accumulating in areas surrounding Jerusalem in the late 19th century. Is it strange to see how jewish terrorists and all the jewish heroes of Israel in Palestine of the past were comprised of non-semitic jews? Moshe Dayan was a Ukrainian Jew, and none of the Prime Ministers of Israel are Israelites. Even the founder of Zionism is non-Semitic. The very organized Jewish Mafia of Israel comprise of non-semitic jews as well.

Let's understand a few basic elements here:
1) Not all Israelites are Jews, some have converted to other religion such as Islam and Christians throughout time
2) Not all jews are Israelites (semitic), the Caucasian (Russian/European) Jews are descended from Japhet Bin Noh.
3) Not all Caucasians are Jews
4) Not all Jews are Zionists; there are many Jews (both Semitic & Non-Semitic) who are against the killing of Palestinians and there are also Jews who feels that there SHOULDN'T even be a state of Israel.
5) Not all Zionists are Jews; many Christians are Zionists as well, such as Al Gore, Joe Biden and Madeleine Albright (despite her background of being Czech-jewish parentage, she is a Roman Catholic)
6) Lastly, a very well known but less spread information : Being an anti-jew is never anti-semitic. To be anti-semitic means that one has hatred and against the children of Sem bin Noh, namely 2 ethnics (brethrens): Arabs and Israelites

By a strange twist, or perhaps, irony, the tribe that destroyed the Kingdom of Israel and Judah became the saviour for the Israelite descendants. The Caucasian Jews brought the Israelites back to Jerusalem, fulfilling the prophecy stated in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own); until Gog and Magog are let through (their barrier), and they swiftly spread out in every direction (replicating themselves amongst all the peoples of the world).”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95-96)

The requirements were completed. The Israelites were returned to Bait-ul-Maqdis by the already-blended Caucasian Jews who were freed from the iron-copper wall. The end of times are here, the countdown has been on even when Muhammad S.A.W. was appointed as the final Prophet by God. We are currently living in a Pax America world, but we can already smell the coming of Pax Judaica, a world run by the the children of Scythians for their one-eyed master, ruling from Jerusalem.

After all of these long walks into history, let's go back to nik aziz' statement. His statement seems to be double edged, and I am not absolutely sure who it is really meant to. If he was supporting Haji Hadi when the latter stated that it is okay to deal with Jews, it certainly is a selfish one, as pas usually is. I don't want to bring up the Israeli cricket team issue of the 1990s anymore as other blogs have dealt with it. However, I would like to see nik aziz stating this to anwar ibrahim over his choice of friends and allies. Why does anwar chose to ally with people like Paul Wofowitz, a Polish Jew, also a neo-con who master-minded the attack on Iraq? He is a strong supporter of the Zionists and associated with the think-tank known as Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). He is responsible for the attack on Iraq.

Another good friend of Anwar and pakatan is Madeleine Albright, a daughter of Czech-Jewish parents who converted to Roman Catholic when Hitler invaded the country. Long considered as a "close friend of Zionists", she was quoted on 60 Minutes, on 12 May 1996, in reference to genocidal sanctions against Iraq,

Questio: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

Madeleine Albright responded, "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it."

Anwar's other friends include Joe Esposito, Michael Camdessus and many more who are long associated with the close relationship to Zionists. Also included are his association with National Endowment for Democracy, Council for Foreign Relations, Accountability, Foundation for the Future and Open Society which receive funds from the same piggy bank that donates billions to the Zionists. These are not the zionists who has no evil agenda behind them.

Nik aziz and pas, along with the Muslims in pkr, must ask themselves, "Is the friend of my beloved leader is our friend?" Or has the moon darken itself in pas? Talk to anwar then, does pas really want to be another so-called Islamic party that is run by and bows down to Zionists? At least, if nik aziz stands his ground, he can finally carry out his responsibilities as a caring Muslim for once. Are anwar's allies the friends that we Malaysians need? Or should we understand more on what Surah Al-Rum is trying to tell us?

Nik aziz's statement is like a blanket too short, it covered Hadi, yet it uncovered anwar's butt, opening it to slaps and pokes.