Showing posts with label Illuminati. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illuminati. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

On The Road To The New World Order?

And they're back. After the embarrassing defeat at PRU13, pakatan has finally came out from behind somebody's bush to launch a demonstration aimed at a coup de tat of Malaysia. This is their latest agenda to get rid of Islam and convert this country into the New World Order.

Their poster, despite the departure from the traditional masonic/luciferian classic, still could not conceal their hidden intentions, as below:


1) We understand that the date was intentional. On the surface, it seems obvious that they are there to hijack the situation as there will already be huge crowds celebrating on the eve of the new year, and the crowd will definitely from across the country and from many parts of the world. They would love to imagine themselves portrayed as "heroes" to the eyes of the world instead of warriors of the one-eyed. This will also give them the perfect opportunity to pretend to the media how "thousands" turn up to support them even if no one came.

Creating a staged riot and chaos will also give them an opportunity to sabotage the economy of Malaysia, portraying the "political instability" to scare away tourists and investors in the media.

However, hidden between the lines, is the actual date itself. Ever since the elections last May, many have predicted the dates of the next pakatan-incited riot, and many got this right. Why 31st December 2013? 3+1+1+2+2+0+1+3 which makes it 13, and 13 is the number Luciferians recognize as the representation of rebellion against God's authority. Luciferians always use 13 as their "aqbsolute" number, and anything that results in or connects to 13 will always be used by them. Of course, my blogger friend and the actual expert in this subject, Afterdark Writes might explain more and/or correct me on this.

The date also represent the final day of the 13th year of the Gregorian millenium, the year that the New World Order was supposed to have been established. Pakatan failed to deliver during PRU13, and was embarrassed when even their western media allies found out that pakatan lied and slandered about the electoral process. The date represents their final hours for them to establish NWO, wresting the country away from rightful Muslims and Malaysians.

The 13 weeks of Winter Solstice from December to February is considered an important season for Luciferians where human sacrifices are made, usually involving youths. Not surprisingly, 31/12/2013 is in that season, and I understand that the advocates of the riot have stated that they will not let anything stand in their way. Will we be seeing bloodshed that night, or blood sacrifices, or something more odious?

After all, one of the Luciferian doctrine is "Getting someone innocent to suffer or to commit suicide is considered a greatly rewarded employment."

2) Despite the change in color, which also looks more in noting their intentions, the similar "ray of light" still persists. To anybody who refuses to think, they will be told that it represents a "ray of hope". But those who are familiar with the Illuminati logo knows that it represents the "power and glory" of the All-Seeing Eye, or the Eye of Providence, or as we have always known him as, The One Eyed.

The eye is replaced with a clenched fist with a lightning bolt inside. Maybe it's new for Malaysians, but the fist has always been the Luciferian code for aggression or threat or even militancy. The lightning bolt represents the biblical fallen angel...yes, Satan, as it was quoted from the bible, Luke 10:18, "And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven."

Why the fists are in dark grey and black? To Luciferians, those two colors have long symbolized primordial chaos upon the earth. So, symbols of the fallen one, clenched in militancy aggression with chaos, with the One Eyed at the back...hmmm, you figure the meaning out.

I guess I leave the rest of the symbolism and codes to your own interpretation.

Are we ready for all of these? Well, pakatan has intensified their slanders, half truths and full blown lies ever since the PRU13 campaigns, with pas giving license to almost everything that dap does against Islam and the Malays. Following the jewish media's footsteps, pakatan repeats the same lies again and again as if it is the truth, until those who couldn't think accept them as the truth. Indeed, we see how many Muslims deceived despite being warned before:

Al Hujarat 6
O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.

It seems that the some Malays are ever so ready and willing to accept fitna as their daily bread, and even defend the kafirs when they come into their mosques to advocate the fighting amongst ummah. Pas stood scared when dap told them to lower the Muezzin's calls to prayer in this Islamic country. You can even find in social media postings how some Muslims even prefer to be slaves to the kafirs instead of ruling by their Islamic brothers. Ulamas who do not side with pas' brand of politics are usually branded as heretics. We are indeed in the witching hours in the age of the end of days.

"There will come a time when knowledge of Islam will be removed, multiple fitna appear, with stinginess and a more pervasive nature of crime." (Muslim)

So, do we go to sleep on the 31st of December 2013 and wake up under the One Eyed in the New World Order? Think first.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Sacrificing The Nation's Independence For A Few Dollars More

So what's the big deal about anwar and his pakatan coming up with a new flag to replace the Malaysian Jalur Gemilang, a new constitution and even a new national anthem? They are, after all, proponents of the politics of hate...well, maybe that's why Malaysians hate them. It's too easy for them to device all of these...in short, they did not come up with those, their sponsors did.

We do understand why pakatan want to do so in many levels. I mean, why would pakatan want to follow something that has been established by the forefathers of independence? Yes, it was the Perikatan (precursor to Barisan Nasional) who were responsible for the creation of the flag, national anthem and constitution, and pakatan can never stay quiet with that fact. They would want something that "they" alone created...well, maybe something to appease their paymasters as well.

Of course, at the moment, their excuse will be that everything was made by the British...still, it is much better than having them made by pakatan's sponsors who Malaysians will have to bow to and sacrifice their freedom once they are in control.

For years, we have seen anwar asking for funds from various countries and organizations. There has to be reasons why he was begging for forgiveness from them over the Freedom Flotilla incident in US. We have seen how Singapore officials, during by-elections travelling with Pakatan bigwigs and even participate in the jewish-sponsored bersih 3. They have to be there, they need to look after their investments. Is it surprising to see that the so-called "new flag" resembles Singaporean flag? Or do we still wonder why the racist DAP's logo still resemble their master, PAP of Singapore's logo? Maybe we can finally figure who actually designed the flag? Who never knew that Singapore is the South East Asia base for CIA (and other organizations linked to the one eyed)?



On a very rare occasion, I was corresponding with the Editor of Mathaba.net, an alternative news media organization about a month ago. The organization was previously set up by Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. Today, I have no idea who they are under but they still write scathing attacks on Malaysia. Previously, they republished an article by Harakah, attacking Tun Mahathir (click here for article)over his remarks on anwar. At that point, I feel that it was hypocrisy on their part as their views on anwar ibrahim is such:

By email
From: Mathaba DotNet  
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:54 AM

...As to the opposition. Just today I had a long conversation with one of Malaysia's top lawyers, and I must say, one of the best men in the world, from a personal and character point of view. I'm proud to say that his views and my own, regarding the opposition and situation in Malaysia, concur almost 100%. Even on this analysis of the sword incident.

Basically, let me explain a little. Anwar Ibrahim, and the NGO that is chasing the submarine issue etc, these have immense advantages over the government or indeed any other party. Do you think AI needs to think or make policies or decisions? No. He has an army of psychologists, propagandists, financiers, all behind him, all in America or wherever, sending him daily reports and funds, what to say, what to attack. His job is easy. It's smooth.

Strange, that's not the first journalist I read or heard of something like that, yet their publications support anwar in total. I guess even they had to obey their paymasters.

What is the strength of these funding? For most Malaysians, being Muslims and aware of the western oppression on Islam is good enough to make all to be careful of these western agendas. In theory, perhaps, but in reality, the funds have made its rounds and we can see how individuals change:

1) The so-called Bersih demonstrations have demonstrated how money, even a little, changes people. Pakatan brought in and paid rioters to run riot and destruction in a location, and at the same time, use them as news for the western media if ever the police take action. Of course, they were also paid to provoke the police into retaliating. It's a good strategy by NED and Open Society to fund this event to make it look as if Malaysia is under oppression.

2) This young man (as pictured) was paid to show his buttocks onto a picture of leaders, a symbol of expressing his dissatisfaction. He was also proud to show his buttocks to the public, which only goes to show the morality of himself. I am sure his parents taught him better. But he doesn't care, he is being paid with funds from other organizations of the one-eyed. Not to mention, those people who spent time stepping on the country leader's pictures. Of course, pay a little bit more, they have no problems stomping on their fathers and mothers.

3) To ensure the constant incoming of funds from their paymasters, pas is ever so ready to get rid anybody who stands for Islam. Hassan Ali was booted for standing up for Muslims, and next in line, maybe the under-fire Nasharuddin Mat Isa. It has always been interesting to see how scholars from pas' ulama faction like Nasharuddin have been discarded for empty vessels of the Erdogan faction like mat sapu, who basically has none of the religious knowledge not has any morality within himself. But pas needs the money, so to them, this has nothing to do with religion as I slam only serves as a factor for them to get votes.

Still on point 3, pas changed the most with the western/jewish funding. Among the 3 components of pakatan, pas has always been the poorest. In the past, their income usually comes from donation and some from the Tabung Memali. Now, their rallies are lavish and most of their leaders are well dressed, and now they struggle teeth and nails to preserve what they enjoy, even if it means sacrificing Islam from their basic fight. The ulama faction has been discarded like garbage in order to cater half-witted and Islamic knowledge lacking erdogan-backed leaders like mat sabu and mahfuz. The influx of former entertainers who lack religious knowledge taking place on their ceramah platforms seems like a move to replace the ulama faction. Any ulama in the world that makes any statement against pas, they will be slandered against. What have the funds turn pas into? Well, I guess the hadith below kinda reminds me of pas:

Dari Sahl bin Saad as-Saaidi r.a. berkata: Rasulullah s.a.w bersabda; "Ya Allah! Jangan kau temukan aku dan mudah-mudahan kamu (sahabat) tidak bertemu dengan suatu masa di mana para ulama sudah tidak diikut lagi, dan orang yang penyantun sudah tidak disegani lagi. Hati mereka seperti hati orang Ajam (pada fasiqnya), lidah mereka seperti lidah orang Arab (pada fasihnya)." (Riwayat Ahmad)

I guess for pas, it is easy to discard Islam in return for foreign funding. Why? Well, as I have written before, pas has never been Islamic, but we know that already. Islam is only a point they use to secure votes for themselves, or to scare people into voting them.

There's a catch, however. Remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch. There are requirements that you need to fulfill to get these foreign funds. Of course, along with that, you'll get the aid of the western media who can twist and spin any issues to your advantage. We have seen, back during the west's designed Currency Crisis in the late 1990s, how Tun Mahathir pushed away IMF's offer of loans as the requirements, if met, will only stand to destroy the Malays' economy. The same factor is met here. What are the requirements? We don't know but from what anwar is campaigning for, we can guess what will be sacrificed:

1) Islam to be taken off from being the official religion of Malaysia. Organizations like the IFC will have a free hand where Muslims are free to apostate without interference from any religious departments.

2) Human rights equality will be imposed: no such thing as Malay Special Privileges. Malays will share equal rights to everybody, although the other races will never share their economic power and wealth with the Malays.

3) With Islam removed and equality imposed, the Lesbian, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgendered organizations will also have their rights implemented.

So far, I wrote 3 elements that will be sacrificed. With the three main factors removed, one can only guess what the other things will be. For DAP, this will be good news: not only they win the second round of May 13th, the cheering crowd will be consisted of Muslims as well. They will also have a field day dismantling the Hak Istimewa Melayu and anything Islamic. Pas will just be an errand boy who is tasked with justifying their means and ends.

It feels good when you have organizations who can back you up financially, but they will never see how expensive it is to repay until it is too late. By the time they realize? Well, we'll be in the New World Order already, worshipping a one-eyed hybrid who claims himself god. To these organizations, funding groups like pakatan, sponsoring riots and chaos in the Muslim countries, arming Israel so that more Palestinians can be slaughtered is nothing to them as they have trillions of dollars in assets and hard cash. They don't mind "investing" in certain individuals or political groups, if it is sound and brings back good returns...although the returns do not have to be in cash, just domination" the New World Order. Once the country falls into their hands, with their puppets running the country under their thumb, their mission is complete.

Are we approaching the end of our independence?
To the participants of Bersih and the twits who were showing off their butt in public, I guess you are the proof of how strong the jewish sponsors are. Maybe the money is sweeter because you don't really have to work for it. To the Muslim Malays in pakatan, enjoy now because once pakatan is in power under the one-eyed organizations, you might just become beggars on your own land.
Pakatan had an open house in Alor Setar today, in conjunction with their Jajah Merdeka Malaysia tour. The turnout was not that good, except for the usual supporters from out-of-state. Why is that so? Do Kedahans like me refuse to go to events and eat food that is prepared by jewish sponsorship?

Do we still take our independence for granted?

Monday, June 25, 2012

After All The One Eyed's And West' Aid, Why Is Anwar Still The Opposition?

It must be said here that, the Holy Al-Al Qur’an and Hadith have forewarned the Muslims of the days to come. The messages may be cryptic and deciphering them on the whole might require more knowledge than human have now. We can be assured that some theories have been advanced and the world looks in a different way. The wall built to seal off the group of people who “causes mischief on earth" have long crumbled. Those people have already inter-bred with the people mainly in the west, where the sun is rising from now. The one-eyed, at one point of hidden history has met them and collaborated with each other, but each of them keeps a suspicious at each other as both parties want to dominate the world.

With the creation of the illegal secular state of Israel after World War 2, concentrations were given in keeping the security of the state. With US, UK and other European countries keeping an eye on the security, the "people from behind the mountains" that now rules Israel can run the world as it sees fit, by proxy.

The hadith on the end of times chronology stated about these people where God commanded to Jesus to bring his followers to a mountain for shelter from these attacking people, stating that no man can destroy them but God. It can be derived that these people, who originally were cunning barbarians that were feared by almost all civilizations, and were blocked from the world by "He of Two Horns", have now evolved into a civilized, disciplined and intellectual bunch of murderers who will not be defeated until the right time. They have always been smart: in the past, knowing that they could not withstand the might of the Muslim army, they devised an ideological war, which led to in-fighting amongst Muslims.

The west today, still learns and studies any movements, organizations and even countries they decide as a "threat" to their survival. We have seen in the past how "regime changes" came about as "the unbound voice of democracy arises." Somewhere along the line, there's always the west poking their fingers in that particular mess. During the Cold War, the west via CIA tried to assassinate Fidel Castro by so many ways but failed, but they managed to execute President Salvador Allende of Chile, a popularly elected leader who is also a Marxist. Their proxy was General Augusto Pinochet, who was given support and sponsorship to launch a coup de tat against Allende's government. The army under Pinochet "suicided" Allende. This was all done to protect US business interest in Chile, and for this, the country suffered the next 25 years under the brutal regime of Augosto Pinochet, US' proxy.

Even the clergy-powered, hardcore Shiite Iran was not spared. President George W Bush (yes, the hollow drunk) approved more than US100 dollar to NGOs in Iran to support the opposition parties against President Ahmadinejad during the 2009 elections. Sure enough, the Iranian opposition suddenly became grand with riots exploding everywhere, but with the clergies in the driving seat and Ahmadinejad's victory, along with the Iranian parliament calling for the executions for the 2 opposition leaders who have been inciting the riots with sponsored cash, the riots died down. Bush failed in his attempt to overthrow the Iranian government. Bush faced impeachment, where among the listed crimes was Article 21of the Kucinich/Wexler impeachment articles: "the president misled Congress and the American people about threats from Iran, and supported terrorist organizations within Iran, with the goal of overthrowing the Iranian government."

Even the Popular Uprising in the Middle East is not excluded from their prying hands. The two greatest events that took place which captured the global community were the Tunisian Revolution that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (Zainal Abidin Bin Ali) of Tunisia and the Egyptian Uprising that finally ousted Hosni Mubarak. The political scenarios were already ripe for revolutions as both leaders of the country had been staunch US allies and supporters, while the majority of the people were not. In Tunisia, the suicide of 26 year old Mohamad Bouazizi by burning himself because his livelihood was confiscated by authorities became the starting point of the revolution. In Egypt, the murder of Khaled Mohamed Saeed by Egypt's secret police culminated into the downfall of President Hosni Mubarak. Basic human rights and fair elections also became the rallying cry in their uprising. Economic conditions were added to these in Libya and Syria.

The uprising took a strange turn in Egypt when Muslims and Coptics (The Egyptian Orthodox Christians) starting clashing over religious intolerance. This is one of the most bizarre points as the Muslims, for hundreds of years, have always respected the Coptics.

It is true that it was the conditions in each country by its respective leaders that led to the uprising, somewhere along the way, the west played their cards as well. Scores of sponsored NGOs and agents have been in those countries, such as National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Young Republicans and many more. For decades they have been seeding unrest by advocating western ideology, or maybe just pretending as humanitarian aid. Their tasks are not military, but more oratory and media-related. With the murder/suicide triggering their cue, hatred and hostility can easily be spread by tongue and received by the angry hearts of the people of the nation. With Mubarak and Ben Ali out, it goes to show that US never even bothered to help the very people they groomed and goes to show further that anybody chosen by the west is expendable.

The current Syrian unrest begs more question than ever. Over time, I have read how many Syrian soldiers and public left the army to join FSA (Free Syrian Army), and how smugglers had a hard job of supplying arms to them.. Their weapons are usually brand new and they are not from the Syrian army depot. Who is the actual group or individual sponsoring the weapons? What is more frightening is that the weapons seem to be more advanced compared to the army.

Will the new leaders of the countries be able to steer their people away from the turmoil? History denotes that each of those countries will face decades of unrest, or at least an uneasy peace. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq, despite the west placing their designed leader there, the fighting continues...just like what the west wanted. I wouldn't cheer for the new Islamist President of Egypt, Mohammed Mossi yet as I will need to read between the lines of whose alliance he is on and which direction he is taking.

These are the basic list of what they fought for in the Popular Uprising:
1) Basic human rights
2) Clean and fair elections
3) Economy

The west has indeed found the best and ultimate way to exercise regime change in countries they deem necessary, without military or any visible hand of theirs, by using the people of the nation. The days of sending snipers and sponsoring disgruntled generals of the army of that particular country may soon be over. What can be cleaner than instigating riots and violence that will oust the leader than by turning the citizens into puppets for their own play? We have seen how they butchered Gaddafi. Still, there are questions that remain unanswered:
a) How come people like Marcos and Ben Ali, among some, can never be extradited to their countries of origin?
b) Is it sheer coincidence that US-sponsored leaders like Hosni Mubarak and Soeharto were suddenly hit by stroke right after they were deposed?
c) How come leaders, who used to be US-allied, like Saddam Hussin were hastily tried and executed. Even the trial became more like a show to the world.

Never give the west an inch, or they'll take over your land. History taught us that, but it seems that even in Malaysia, after hundreds of years under colonization, anwar and pakatan seem to be opening up more space than needed in their lust for power.

In a true template to the west' design, anwar played the same card...although with different results. Along with dap, pkr and the dope among all, pas, they went around sowing seeds of disunity. Mind you, these "seeds of disunity" are the points that the west consider good enough to topple a country if exposed and strategically attacked.

The racial disunity card was played well by anwar and his pakatan. Institutions that help Malays and Bumiputras were condemned as corrupt and self-serving. They even attacked the New Economic Program as "a corrupt program that enriches only politicians."

Religious insensitivity was introduced by pakatan, spearheaded by DAP. Lim guan eng and the dyspeptic kapal sink were loud in making their anti-Islamic stand, followed suit by Bar Council. Worse, ambiga promoted the Inter-Faith Commission and along with pakatan, threw their weight in for the apostasy of Lina Joy.

Polis Diraja Malaysia received much of the brunt of the attack by pakatan. Painted as brutal, corrupt and government's dogs, pakatan even staged several dramas where they provoke police by attacking them, and once the police retaliate, they start taking pictures to be sold to the world. Unfortunately for anwar, he went to the same well one too many times. His stage plays have been recorded during the bersih riots. This is the usual effort to attack any country's public defense. I wonder why anwar never mentioned about the US police and National Guard bashing Occupy demonstrators in Minnesota a month or so ago.

 In another effort to further weaken the defenses of the nation, anwar attacked the army as well (click here for article) by claiming that the army is the hand that ensures Barisan's winning by ordering that all ballot papers must have Barisan Nasional checked beforehand. He also claimed that the army will always be ready to take over the country should ever Barisan lose the general election. This is necessary to create distrust between the public and the army and even among the army themselves. We should always remember, the police and the army played pivotal roles in securing the nation during the May 13th Riots.

Pakatan rakyat has been claiming of how bad the economy in Malaysia has been, with most GLCs facing disaster, i.e. Felda going bankrupt and that sort. But they were left with their mouth open and their cheeks slapped tight when Felda announced huge windfalls for Felda settlers. Even the settlers who have been severely critical of Felda had to force themselves to be unabashed to collect their cheques, while pakatan got bashed. Their red faces of embarrassment glowed so bright that one could swear that it was Chinese New Year.


Anwar and pakatan, along with ambiga and bar council staged the bersih rallies, sponsored by NED via George Soros. By strategic planning of the NGO, and paid spectators, bersih became the ugliest event in the country, causing millions of RM in damages. This move did confuse many, even in the west. With pakatan winning 5 states in the 2008 General Elections, why is anwar claiming that the election was dirty and corrupt? If BN keeps winning all the time with more than 90% majority (like in the case of Ben Ali), it would've been a different question altogether. On the other hand, the bersih rally was a blessing to Malaysians: they get to see how pakatan degraded themselves to be terrorists and became pawns of the west. In return, the final bersih rally threw dirt into anwar and pakatan's face when they had to deal with so much anger from the public. I must say that, despite getting Malaysians to be angry, anwar and pakatan got them on the wrong side of the scale.

Let's see now, anwar and his pakatan rakyat have followed the recipe given by the west and spent the sponsorship freely, but what went wrong? Why are they still the opposition? Why isn't anwar the President of the Republic of Malaysia yet? Didn't the west studied Malaysia's fragile points already and taught anwar properly on how to strategically destroy them? In fact, Malaysia has always been a strong opposition to Israel and has always been vocal about it, shouldn't the west want that threat neutralized?

Maybe anwar should wonder to himself, is the west serious in their attempts to place him as the leader of this nation? Have they forsaken him because he spoke against Israel on the Freedom Flotilla issue? Or because he keeps mucking up by having more and more of his tight secrets being revealed by his once-loyal-supporters and Ummi Hafilda? The latest revelation on his a few billions of RM in his accounts is making him more popular in the wrong way. His support for Israel's security, while it puts a smile on the west, made him enemies of the Muslims and his reputation with Hamas is questionable...although it has always been questionable in the first place. The lack of attendants to his ceramahs is beginning to show how much liability he is to pakatan and to the west. With more videos slated to be released on anwar's slam-bang-thank you-ma'am by his once loyal close aides, the west might have to rethink of their strategies.

History has shown how the west chose less-than-clean individuals to be the replacement leader of certain nations, as they always need skeletons in the closet for controlling factorbut it is not supposed to be that obvious. Even anwar's face demonstrates the diminishing luster and aura. Is the west dumping him? Even if they do, the damage has been done, and it will take time to repair them. Pas might have to look deep into their hearts; their reputation (if any) has been annihilated by their participation with anwar in pakatan. The mega-pig farm, Madrasah Salihiah waqf land, pubs and nite-clubs in Kedah, their support for Lina Joy's apostasy, their non-action on the use of "Allah" by other religions, their shameful act of turning Unit Amal into terrorists and their ever loyal support for a man who supports Israel and supported by Jews despite their so-called Islamic stand, these have so much eroded Muslims' trust in pas. Having anwar, pkr and dap turning their backs on the Muslims and Malays is a grave injury, but with pas joining them to do the same made it fatal.


I don't think the west really cares what happens to anwar after this; the Neo-cons have lost their power base under Obama. To the jews, Malaysia is not located anywhere on the land which they claim is God's promise to Abraham: from the banks of the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. To the one eyed, anwar is just a speck of dust of one wannabe leader whose worth is 5 sen a dozen.

While the Muslims and Malays fight one another in Malaysia, guess who's laughing at the dap hq. Oh yes, by the way, with all of the Muslim countries fighting amongst themselves, including us, guess who's laughing in the conquered land of Bayt-ul Maqdis?

Friday, June 22, 2012

Filthy Foreign Diplomats At The Grotesque Bersih 3.0? Kick Them Out!

This is an interesting article from AIDC, which is as below:

Bersih 3. 0 : Foreign diplomats’ named for alleged involvement
Published by AIDC on June 21, 2012


Mole.my – The alleged involvement of foreign diplomats during the Bersih 3.0 rally is widely discussed in the Malaysian blogosphere.


Apart from foreign diplomats’ involvement, few blogs also highlighted a special programme purportedly organised in Singapore which is specially designed to interfere with Malaysia’s 13th General Election process.


A blog post at AnwarAIDC named three Singaporean officers from the High Commission office to be involved which includes – its First Secretary (Political) Regina Low and Philomena Aw as well as Deputy High Commissioner and Counsellor Ariel Eunice Tan.


 “The active participation of the three diplomats in moving along with the protesting group from Petaling Street to Dataran Merdeka was clearly in contravention of ethics under ‘Article 41 (1) of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961’, which forbids diplomats from meddling in the affairs of another nation,” the post stated.


The post also linked the speech made by Minister of Foreign Affairs Datuk Seri Anifah Aman during a luncheon with Asean leaders on June 11.


During the speech, Anifah who received reports of the involvement by foreign diplomats during the rally said: “Whether such involvement or participation is truly for information gathering or otherwise, it is definitely not a good move.”


 “I am worried that such a move may lead to some negative perceptions. Worse still, diplomats concerned may get involved or injured in unfortunate incidents, given the unruly nature of street demonstrations,” he added.


Following the allegation, another blog post at MyMassa urged the government to take serious action regarding the involvement of foreign diplomats in Malaysian politics. “


We view this matter seriously. We hope the government will call these diplomats and send a Protest Note to them,” the post read, adding that any inaction by the government will only leave impressions to Singapore that the Malaysian law and the police force is weak.


In another related issue pertaining foreign involvements for the Malaysia’s GE 13, a blog postby MyMassa on Monday published several photos of PACA (Polling Agent and Counting Agent) Training Programme, which allegedly forms the basis for Singapore’s involvement in Malaysian politics.


One of the photos showed a print screen from the PACA Facebook page where it stated that the programme, scheduled on May 19 was intended to teach participants to cheat in voting so that they can stop the cheating during the GE13.


It also stated there will be a shortage of PACAs for non-BN parties as compared to BN due to better machinery and resources during the election.


“However, as a PACA, you may volunteer for any party of your choice to ensure free and fair election,” the statement suggested.


Meanwhile, Utusan Malaysia columnist and deputy editor Datuk Zaini Hassan in his column on Wednesday wrote the authority should not keep allegations away from the public. 

Zaini described the allegations, which showed how foreign power attempts to influence Malaysians and to overthrow the ruling government as shocking. 

“Malaysia has always been nice to its neighbours under the spirit of Asean but it is often ignored. If such allegations are true, Malaysia should not let it persist” he added. Attempts to contact High Commission of The Republic of Singapore for clarifications by The Mole have not been successful.

Well, looks like Bersih 3.0 really blacken Anwar and pakatan rakyat as another one of his secret "pact" was revealed. What were the foreigners for? Nobody can be sure, but with much reference to political manouvres in history, I think they were trying to create an international incident where they were hoping to be "injured" by the Police, so that the medias of the West can burn their headlines with such glee and put a global pressure on the present government. Then again, with those Singaporeans, what do you expect from the people from an island where CIA and Mossad use as their base in South East Asia?

Thursday, June 21, 2012

...And Pas Has Never Been Islamic; But We Always Know That

There are times when people can actually read the writing on the wall. Anwar, I guess, has gotten at least a clue about it with almost empty halls, and more people watching Euro rather than his ceramahs. What makes it worse for him is that Euro starts around midnight while his ceramah is around 9:00p.m. Maybe that's why there is more participation from his allies from and via an island state in the south.

What about the deluded party who claim themselves as Islamic? Do they even realize the road that they took? Or even the consequences of selling their souls to the devil?

We can blame the west for making sure that no ethnic group in any of their colonies can ever unite. Against the united Indians under Gandhi, they made sure religion splits them into India and Pakistan. Then again, maybe we should be grateful to them as well for not giving the same treatment that they did to the Native Americans, Aborogines or even Hawaiians where they chose to "exterminate the brutes." Malaysia was not spared when pas was introduced to ensure a rift among Malays.

The damage was done, pas became a political party that uses Islam only for the sake of winning votes. All the years then saw how they degraded the teachings of Islam and turn their backs on Muslims. With n.ajis and Haji hadi at the helm, they steered the ship into one of the biggest deviation of Islam Malaysia has ever seen.

There was a time when n.ajis instructed that government buildings should not display the picture of the Prime Minister of Malaysia (then Tun Mahathir), reasoning that it lead people to acts of glorification and led astray from the Islamic teachings. But he sure didn't say a word about his pictures being hung up in Kelantan government offices, along with his picture on badges being sold at pas-owned shops. Even today, and during the disastrous Hijau Ke Putrajaya rally in Kedah, one can see the n.ajis factions in pas wearing the badge.

What about n.ajis' saying that it is allowed to swear, curse and use profanities in Islam? Or even saying the same about cooperating with the devil? Or even using money from the jews in order to create chaos and split among the ummah and threaten the safety of a nation?

Perhaps one of the biggest deviations ever by pas is the Amanat Haji Hadi, where in one swoop, pas condemns UMNO as heretics for working hand in hand with MCA and MIC and other components who are not of the Islamic faith. It is a wonder how Malays who had less than 20 cents of knowledge of the holy book can never figure out that hadi edited and chopped the verses of the Qur'an, and most of it, twisted the meanings to his own liking to suit his political agenda. One of the results of this is the rifts created where one mosque with 2 Imams as one of the Imams was considered un-Islamic because he was not from pas.

The biggest error in jedgement by pas must be the support and loyalty they pledged to anwar in his and their lust to be in power, which undid most of the things they have stood for. They even supported the chauvenistic and anti-Islamic DAP and the Bar Council as well. I guess, for pas, as long as it will take them to power, Islam can be stepped on and  kicked out. Of course, in doing so, pas contradicted themselves and hadi's amanat. Now they claim that it is acceptable to join hands with the staunchly anti-Islamic dap but it is still heretical for UMNO to work with MCA and MIC. Now, I still can't find anywhere in Islamic teachings that allows anybody to practice double-standard.

Where can pas put their faces in shame when anwar supported the security of the illegal state of Israel? Even Hamas denies anwar's stand. All the years of putting on great shows against US and Israel became undone when they choose to stick to anwar with such loyalty. Of course, as pas has mentioned, their stand differs from anwar. This is odd, if anwar becomes the President and supports Israel, will pas walk out on him? Perhaps RM20b will discourage them from doing so. Why did pas suddenly lose their balls to stand up for Islam when anwar supported Lina Joy's apostasy? I see, this will be a great nation when anwar becomes President and his strongest allies have different stands.

What is the big fuss that we have to face when pas, along with pkr and dap protest against the building of a religious school (Sekolah Agamka Rakyat) in Gopeng? Consider that a parallelity and in comparison to what's happening in Kedah, where pas decides to get rid of a historic Madrasah and use the waqf land to build a shopping center. None of pas members were present when Muslims demonstrated against the taking of the waqf land. When the parents of the SAR students demonstrated, pas turned their back to them. Worse still, pas mooned them by collaborating with Lee Boon Chye in proposing the destruction of the school.

The Qur'an is right when it said that those group of people who were locked behind a great mountain range always created mischief on Earth. Muslims against Muslims in the Middle East and Asia, Malays against Malays here...and they get to keep Baytul Maqdis and ensure no outside interference when it comes to eradicating Palestinians. One thing for sure, with pas proclaiming itself as "the most Islamic" in Malaysia, they damaged the religion more. They don't seem to care about Islam and the ummah though, all that matters is power. I guess the west succeeded in making them into one-eyed minds. M.ajis' once stated that it is okay in Islam to humiliate other leaders or individuals but went berserk when Tun Mahathir lambasted him silly in his popular blog. That, although a small example, is enough to show the dementia caused by the one-eyed minds of pas. They have now come to a point where they do not care about any criticisms made about them by religious figures of the world.

Anwar, I must say, is smart. By making pas legitimize or branding his actions as "halal", he managed to degrade pas. And knowing pas' arrogance and forever in denial-attitude, anwar used pas to his own benefit, such as turning the unit amal into a bunch of amateur terrorists to be used during bersih 3.0. Worse still, the stupid unit amal pas wore their silly uniforms and attacked the police instead of wearing normal shirts. Though they try to pin the blame on the police, many parts of the world, via alternative media, has seen the aggression made by the unit amal. Anwar, who disappeared early, got off scott-free. Pas joining pakatan for the sake of power and glory is the ultimate betrayal to the Muslims and Malays in Malaysia. They are now nothing but stooges for anwar and his one-eyed allies.

There was a time when Najib apoligized to Malaysia, on behalf of UMNO and Barisan Nasional for the wrongs done in the past...most of all, maybe during pak lah's time. Will Muslims ever see pas apologizing for all the deviations they committed on the ummah? Well, wouldn't it be surprising? Pas has never been Islamic, but we always know that.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Bersih 3.0 - Suffering The Consequences of Their Own Actions

It all started with a dream: anwar thought bersih 3.0 will finally make him President of Malaysia, Azmin thought he and nurul izzah will be Vice President, along with guan eng. They thought they'll be having Roman orgies in Putrajaya, all sexual allegations thrown aside and serve their masters well...well, that did not happen. What bersih 3.0 brought was nothing but misery, first to Malaysians, and now to pakatan themselves.

It has been seen how the squabble between the actual bersih demonstrators have now voiced out vocally against anwar's hijacking (or at least that's what they thought) of the event by his paid rioters. Those who came to actually protest peacefully saw their lives rolling in front of their eyes when the sponsored demonstrators took over and rampaged through the area. The young independent film-maker did confront anwar (for full story, click here ), but as usual, when anwar finds himself unable to defend or justify anything, he ensure that the young man was manhandled away from the press conference.

The ambiguous ambiga did not fare better either. After "strangely" unable to control (again and as usual) her bersih 3.0 demonstrators from going berserk on cue, she has since never apologized or at least try to look sorry for the paid destruction bersih 3.0 made. Traders and small entrepreneurs who have long been angry with bersih organizers this time set up peaceful protests and there's even a burger stall set up in front of her home. (for story, click here ). With burgers, ambiga was also served buns by Army veterans today (for full story, click here ). So far, we haven't seen anwar with sausages and azmin with refreshing medical ice-cream.

Speaking of anwar and ambiguous...errr...ambiga, from the turmoil of anwar's press conference, it seems that: 1) Ambiga actually planned a peaceful demonstrations 2) anwar planned the riot 3) A miscommunication between anwar and ambiga almost cost the actual peaceful demonstrators their lives Really? It looks more like ambiga knows what anwar has been cooking all the while, but never bothered to tell her participants.

Still on the two pagliaccis, what about the so-called NGOs who supported the rally? It sounds grand when anwar and ambiga stated that 80 NGOs supported them, but really, why are 61 of them never existed? It's bad enough that bersih is funded by non-Malaysian groups who had more success in the Middle East, but a rally supported by non-existent groups too? (For full story and list, click here )

The bersih 3.o performance fiasco brought an almost forgotten individual back into the limelight. Tan Sri Rahim Noor, the former Police IGP, famous for giving anwar the black eye, called the decrepit n.ajis, pas' mursyidul am leader as Father of Infidels, or "Bapa Kafir." The statement was highly controversial, especially for devout pas worshippers who consider the statement as a sacrilege. For other Muslims who know n.ajis as just another politician disguised as an ulama, the statement was in a way, well, not very nice to say but accurate in many degrees. For a man who uses and manipulates Islam for his advantage in order to win polls just got what he deserved. Paying people in order to cause destruction and he branded the violent acts as halal? Praising a program sponsored by euro-jewish conspirators from the same piggy bank that was used to murder Palestinians and create chaos and deaths in other Muslim countries? Verily, n.ajis is a lost cause and a lost soul. We would suggest that he meet somebody like Sheikh Imran Hosein, but we know that n.ajis will claim that he's too pious for that.

Even the socialist dap was not spared from these ass-biting repercussions of bersih 3.0. The vocal protests from their own national Vice Chairman, YM Tunku Aziz Tunku Ibrahim was deemed too much by the socialists. The senator's term was not extended and the highly principled Tunku Aziz left dap with his dignity intact and the socialists in shambles.

Tunku Aziz joined dap in 2008 and was almost immediately appointed as Vice Chairman of the party in the same year. Of course, dap stated that it was the honor bestowed on Tunku although it was actually a bait trying to get Malays to join dap. Dap is no stranger to riots and unrests, as we have ready history, especially when it comes to the May 13th incident. Just like the communists who tried to enlist Malays to be in their godless and violent fight, dap tried to entice any Malays who are dimwitted enough to join their socialist group by placing a Malay at the top of their party. So, did dap take action on Tunku Aziz because he really spoke against the bersih rally or is it because Tunku Aziz was trying to stop fellow Muslim Malays from being jack-asses who had been played into the one-eyed game? We have seen in the past how dap always stayed at home everytime a demonstration erupts violently, where Muslims go against Muslims, Malays go against Malays. Dap would really love that. Tunku Aziz has parted way with dap(http://espresi.com/showthread.php?1085-Tunku-Aziz-quits-DAP), and it seems that dap's mega-bucks cannot buy him now.

Pas is now waiting with bated breath as the Saudi government will decide on the pilgrimage quota for Malaysia. It all started when some yellow-brained pas members decide to bring Bersih rally to Mecca, hoping it will go viral. Well, somebody please give that twit something anti-viral, the Saudi government went ballistic as they have seen the destructive force of something similar to that in the countries around them, and truth to say, bringing a jewish-sponsored program to Mecca is never a good idea. If the Saudi government really reduces the quota, then pas and pakatan will be condemned by thousands upon thousands of eager pilgrim-to-be who might just see their chances of going to pilgrimage to Mecca being delayed, all of this because some chaps from a party who thought they are most Islamic ruin them all with some yellow shirt and jewish-sponsored ideology.

The bersih rally cry during Najib's visit was described as something very comical. My cousin e-mailed me on this matter, and I saw it on Youtube. It seemed that only 2 or 3 people try to sabotage the event with the bersih chant, but instead of the chant getting viral, Najib replied to them kindly, and this in short humuliated the few, and the majority of Malaysians there were so happy when the hecklers finally shut up. It seems that Malaysians there are still talking about the cool reaction of Najib, and those few bersih supporters are still extremely angry because nobody supported them.

So, what have been the benefits of bersih 3.0 to pakatan? Looks more like they had fire up in their asses, now ain't that a kick to their heads?

How would a rally which has been designed, strategized and funded by cronies of the one-eye benefit Malaysians when the same program in a different cover caused so much misery and death in other Islamic countries?

What's so Malaysian about bersih when the money for the program and participants come from outside of Malaysia?

How would Malaysians benefit from bersih when it made so much destruction on properties which have been paid for by Malaysians through their taxes?

Even when the program was taken abroad for viral reasons, it became pathetically insignificant, and even if it did, Malaysian Muslims who want to go on pilgrimage now are threatened with a reduction in quota because of it.

Malaysians have seen the violence and the terrible devastation brought upon by bersih 3.0, and I guess by now Malaysians really want to let anwar and his pakatan to feel the repercussions. Maybe it is ime for anwar and his pakatan to suffer the consequences of their own actions. On this, I remember my old Ustaz, who at one time said, "Evil intentions will only bring undesirable repercussions to one's self."

Too bad, Anwar. Maybe you'll need the one-eyed to send his army to make you President. 


Ambiga said, there'll be no Bersih 4...really, who believes her anyway? It's not her call anyway.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

The One-Eyed Factor Behind Anwar - Saying What Has Been Said


There were times over and over again when we tried to inform people of these shadowy movements lurking behind anwar ibrahim and his so-called reformasi movement, but for that, we were branded as madmen, doom-sayers, lunatics and list goes on and on.

Today, by the grace of God, Malaysians have finally seen or at least, sensed the existence of this unsavoury existence of the one-eyed element manifesting within anwar's actions.

On the shadowy elements behind anwar and his so-called movements, check out the article below:

The foreign factor on April 28
By M. VEERA PANDIYAN, The Star, 10 May 12

Bersih’s peaceful supporters have the right to know the nexus between the ‘free and fair’ polls movement, the Pakatan Rakyat leader and foreign financial and political backers.

SOMETIMES, knowing too many people can be painful, especially when they try to draw you into political discussions in the most unlikely of places.

As a rule, I have always refrained from talking politics in restaurants or pubs but these days, it’s become a guideline that’s hard to keep.

It appears that, recently, almost everyone has become an expert on politics – even those who had never bothered to vote before, despite being in their 40s and 50s.

The problem with these new political pundits is that they want to convert you to their side and refuse to listen to alternate viewpoints.

There is no doubt that the April 28 Bersih 3.0 protest has created more such people besides widening the gap between supporters of Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat.

The rally, the biggest that the country has seen so far, is also significant because most of those who turned up did so in peace, seeking free and fair elections.

Understandably, this group is upset that Opposition politicians hijacked the rally which turned ugly in the end.

A new website – www.dearambiga.com – says in its introduction: “We are angry. Why?

Because Bersih should be an NGO by the people, for the people of all races, areas and political views.

“But in Bersih 3.0, some Pakatan Rakyat bosses took advantage of our noble cause for their own political interests and benefit!”

The website has a clip of a heated exchange between independent filmmaker Benji Lim and Pakatan Rakyat’s Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim over the hijacking of the rally.

It also has a petition titled “Time to stop Pakatan Rakyat hijacking our movement”, and urges visitors to e-mail Ambiga on the issue.

Perhaps, the peaceful people and those behind the website should take a closer look at allegations that bigger forces are behind the movement.

Tony Cartalucci of the Land Destroyer Report website, for example, says that Bersih’s leadership is being supported financially and politically by foreign organisations.


He cited a Malaysian Insider report on June 27, 2011 in which the Bersih leader admitted receiving money from two US organisations – the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) – for projects which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 Bersih 2.0 march.

However, he wrote that the NDI website revealed that funding and training had indeed been provided before the organisation removed the information and replaced it with a more benign version, purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.


He said the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to the movement suggested “something more sinister at play”.

“That Anwar himself was Chair-man of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined NED’s Democracy Award and a panelist at an NED donation ceremony – the very same organisation whose subsidiaries are funding and supporting Bersih – casts irrefutable doubt on their official agenda for clean and fair elections,” he wrote.

As such, Cartalucci said claims by Bersih supporters that Anwar had hijacked their movement rang hollow when looking at both his and Bersih’s entwined foreign financial and political backers.

He said with Bersih leaders’ recipients of aid from NED and OSI, and Anwar being a functionary of the IMF, it was certain that no matter how genuine Bersih’s rank and file might be, the fruits of their efforts would be the destabilisation and neo-recolonisation of a country that had fought long and hard to work its way out from Western imperialism.

If indeed the movement is about civil society’s rights to free and fair elections, Malaysians deserve to know more about these links.

But I doubt if people would rush to check the veracity of such reports or demand an explanation.

Blame it on what psychologists call “confirmation bias”. It is the propensity to look for what confirms one’s beliefs and ignore what contradicts them. It’s more pronounced when it comes to politics.

> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this quote by English philosopher William Penn: Passion is the mob of the man, that commits a riot upon his reason.


Was it all necessary in the first place? For anwar, it seems that the politics of anger is about to devour him alive. People were angry with the government back in 2008 during the nitwit and son-in-law's reign. Najib's diplomacy and radical transformations seemed to be in favor of Malaysians on the whole, much to anwar's ire. With much to gain from the programs and policies, anger has been long discarded and this put anwar's dream in jeopardy. For pakatan to keep their dreams of winning alive, they need people to remain angry. Spin and spin, lies after lies but nothing seem to work, and they had banked a lot on the bersih program.

Bersih 3.0 was supposed to be viral, or at least on paper, which was supposed to lead to a major revolt, overthrowing the government and implementing a regime change to which anwar would benefit, and it all started with a few simple instructions to his refreshing dessert, azmin ali just be fore anwar disappeared from view totally. It was the beginning of the biggest flop ever, and like the movie Heaven's Gate, it was hugely budgeted, massively constructed but tanked dismally. Anwar still wakes up every morning, asking himself, "Why am I still not a President?" The anger most Malaysians have now is with anwar and his pakatan for the massive destruction they had caused to the taxpayers.

Will his sponsors now commit to a bigger and more unscrupulous, more massive scaled riot called Bersih 4? Rumours has it that the next bersih riot will be held during the general election, with riots to be conducted if Pakatan loses. Will that happen? With the huge budgets they have distributed and failure after failure that were returned, would those NGOs dare to sponsor a regime change on behest of one chap who's lusting for power?

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Mansuh PTPTN To Bersih 3.0 - Our Money Against The Sponsored

I must say that the surprise is gone. There's no more shocks or suspense. The scripts have been lame, cliched and mass-produced. No, I'm not talking about Malay movies, I'm talking about anwar's strategy.

People like anwar and his one-eyed sponsors such as NED and Open Society must be wondering on what is wrong with Malaysia? And why won't the population explode into a full scale riot for anwar everytime they sponsor a demonstration or unrest? Millions have been spent, but no results has been satisfying. Will the caucasian sponsors finally pull the plug and abandon anwar?

Every unrest has been carefully designed since 1998. Agent provocateurs were surreptitiously planted during demonstrations in order to create the chaos. To generate award-winning sympathetic pictures, they will charge threateningly at the police, and the police retaliates by shooting tear-gas, pictures will be taken to manufacture "police brutality." True to NED's design, everything is news, even if cut yourself while shaving before the rally, it will be used to portray brute force used by the police. I am sure there are plans and directives by pakatan to have those students "attacked" or something similar by "UMNO" to provoke sympathy. It's an all too familiar story by anwar.

University students have always been the target by these foreign NGOs as they have learned the strength and power that these students have to generate impacts and changes in a country. The US in the late 1960s and 1970s had their policies influenced and sway by the university students' movements. Theone-eyed organizations have harnessed its power and used it to their advantage. Now that they have the issue of PTPTN, they feel that the time is ripe to unleash their fury via the students.

The meddling of these foreign NGOs in the Middle East has yielded its results: bloody, chaotic and shattering, but that's the design. The university students play quite a large and significant role in places like Egypt. It is the same plot and script being used in Malaysia by them via pakatan. Let us just hope that it will not end in the same bloody gore that we saw there.

It is quite unfortunate for anwar and pakatan to have only 200 students attending, although half of them is still unverified whether they're there as students and for the money or just for the money. They were cursing at the rest of the 200,000 students who never bothered to attend. There were also those who went there looking for romance and a chance to get laid, but that's another story. So now, while nurul izzah is embarking on an oddyssey to solve the greatest mystery amongs all...yes, whether he has another sister or not...the students are camping at Daran Merdeka, waiting for Bersih 3.0.

There are many in pakatan who feels that bersih 3.0 is unnecessary, but for anwar and his sponsors, there is no turning back. The strategy has been drawn, the money has been allocated, the provocateurs have been trained, and anwar is hoping that this might be the one to lead him to Putrajaya. It will look good for him, being portrayed as being led to the leadership of a country on the shoulders of his paid-people. Wolfowitz, Gore and other accomplices might just sing praises of him for that.

The crux of the matter remains that both demos, Mansuh PTPTN and Bersih have nothing to do with their names. Why do I say that? Simple: looking at the banners and placards of the demos, they reflect nothing about the issue they're supposed to carry. Most of their banners are condemning Najib, his wife, UMNO and BN. Maybe anwar feels that with 200 students extra, he has the momentum to launch a full scale assault on Malaysia for his sponsors.

The things about university students...well, I was at one time too, is that they are idealistic, yet easily manipulated. They can easily be swayed to go against PTPTN but without any clue on the objectives and mechanism on why PTPTN is like that. Of course, there are some who are there for selfish reason like, they know that they're just aberage in their academics and they feel that paying back loans is a pain just like studying. It's always "we want this and/or that" but never considering what the majority wants. They are the best candidate for liberalism and the so-called human rights as they feel that, as university students, they are the smartest people on the planet. These are the students who become tools for these foreign NGOs without realizing it as they are so engrossed in doing what they do instead of studying. Would they ever wake up from the unreal slumber and realize that one of their eyes are blind? Yes, for most of them, but it will be years from now. Many of the university students who became Reformasi activists in 1998/99 have realized what they had done, but then a decade has passed. A few even commented on how they almost destroyed a country for a man with skeletons in his closet. Will the present crop of tumbleweeds at Dataran Merdeka realize? They will, but along the way, they might just be the collapse of the country and play into the hands of pax judaica.

What has happened and what is happening only further proves to us that, these people might be students who could be doing well in academics, but fails to use their brain in the real world. If they succeed in putting anwar on the throne, anwar will be taking care of them for a short time before saying "go to hell" after getting what he desires.

Is there at any time, our tax dollars can ever defeat the money coming in for pakatan via the NGOs? Can our billions of RM ever defeat their trillion of USD? They have the resources to replicate strategies which they succesfully used in other countries, they can hire provocateurs to play racial cards,

religious enmity, dissatisfaction towards the electoral system, the government and even the armed forces. All of this done to ensure cracks in the Malaysian integrity, weakening them so that their plots can move along without opposition. They also hope that there will be a total abolition of ISA asit has been a bane in their existence, making their task difficult.

As taxpayers, we work very hard for our money, and being glad that we have the basic necessity, benefits and infrastructure in the country, we pay our annual income tax. There are other taxes that we pay. All the monies, along with the one collected from other government bodies such as EPF, Petronas etc are used for so many things, such as benefits for the disabled, subsidies, maintenance of infrastructure and many more, including the PTPTN loans given out to those students. So, can the students who are camping at Dataran Merdeka return our money then? If they refuse, go back to your studies then. We expect them to get good grades and go on to become somebody useful, not as tools of the new world order via anwar. I don't care how small the percentage of our tax is involved in PTPTN, I want it back since the students are against it. Why would I want to pay my taxes so that some dimwitted ingrate who ends up being a pawn for the foreign NGOs misuses it?

Bersih organizers claim that Dataran Merdeka belong to the rakyat and not DBKL, in that case why are we letting those who are a proxy and pawns to foreign NGOs with dark agendas rule our hard-earned-tax-RM-maintained area? Even now it's full of students who use our money to do everything but study. We have a right to go to the students' camps and pull out the camps, roll the canvas, turn them up sideways and cram it up their candied behinds. Who gave them the right to ruin our hard-earned money-maintained-area with their sponsored agendas anyway? If they work for money from outside of the country, move there then.

To the students who complaint about PTPTN loans, give us back the money, there are thousands of students out there who wants the place in the university and need the loan. Their money, on the other hand, will flow more from today to Bersih and who knows, to the next General Election.

Popular Posts