How Many Syawals More Do We Have Before...

Spanish Inquisition On Muslims and Jews

History has seen how the Muslims faced numerous persecutions accross the world. The Spanish Inquisition was one of the most barbaric among all. Despite the massacres and tortures to force Muslims and Jews to convert to Christianity, it is also no secret that the Spanish retalitation was also based on the deep insult they felt being Europeans being conquered by an "uncivilized" sub-human: the Arabs and the Moors. It is also because of the inquisition that Spain consumes more pork than before, as it used to be their weapon for ethnic cleansing. They would hold banquets, and anybody who do not touch the pork will be arrested, tortured or even killed as they are deemed to be Muslims.

The vengeance was quite prolonged, when Spain conquered the Philipines, they forced the people there to convert to Christianity and forced them to rear pigs as well. The capital, Madinallah was changed to Manila. As a result, the Muslim majority (Moro) fled to Mindanao. Well, originally they were never called Moros but the appearance of the Muslim Malay warriors there reminded the Spaniards of the Moors who ruled them for hundreds of years, hence they called them Moro (Moor).

The Pol Pot regime of Cambodia, on the surface seemed to be unbiased in targetting their victims for mass murder, in reality they targeted the ethnic Cham people (Muslim Malays). The reason given is that the Chams are a different group of people who do not reflect Cambodia: the live differently, eat differently (halal), strong in their Islamic faith and have their own culture with strong family ties. This persecution was not new. The Muslim Chams, for a very short period of time, ruled Cambodia a few hundred years back before the Buddhist Khmers overran them, and the Khmers even tried to erase them from history.

Of course, the modern world is not spared from acts of persecution: the Bosnians, Kurds and of course, the Rohingyas.

Who are the Rohingyas? The Rohingyas, numbering less than 1 million in population are a Muslim ethnic group who resides in the Arakan region of western Myanmar. It’s amazing that Myanmarese (or Burmese) never considered them part of their own people despite them being there for the past 600 years. They are the descendants of Muslim Bengalese soldiers who were sent by the Sultan of Bengal to aide King Narameikhla to regain his kingdom in the Arakans. After the kingdom was established, they settled there. However, with the conquest of the Arakan by the Buddhist Burmese, the Rohingyas were persecuted, initiating their refugee status more than 400 years ago.  Is it strange that Burmese historians claim that there are no such people called Rohingyas in the history of Myanmar, when even the British conquerors of Burma recognized them? According to an article on the "Burma Empire" published by the British Francis Buchanan-Hamilton in 1799, "the Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan," "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." Hence, the term Rohingya was already established back then.

Where do they go from there? The “revered” democracy warrior Aung San Suu Kyi, has kept quiet about the whole Rohingya affair. She's more concerned about losing Myanmarese support if she places her support for the Rohingyas. (For full article, click here) The persecution is nearly complete: massacred, raped and pillaged by Burmese (every other junta does that to them), Japanese during WW2, and even unaccepted by Bangladesh.

We have seen the Palestinians suffering persecution by the non-semitic jews majority of the secular state of Israel for the last 60 years. These people, who came running down from high places after the great wall built by “He of Two Horns” came crumbling down at God’s promised time, have somehow felt that Jerusalem is theirs, despite never being from there at all. Just like the other persecuted Muslims in the world, we can only sit down and watch while the west legalizes their massacres. We try to help in certain ways, but we have also seen the Freedom Flotilla issue.

It seems that we have come to a point in time where being Muslims can be such a crime. Until the emergence of the Mahdi, we should be able to work with ourselves, unite and help our persecuted brethrens in any way possible. Is it still possible?

The Muslims in Malaysia is also moving towards destruction, if what is happening now is not stopped. We have seen how a self-proclaimed Islamic party called pas, became a tool of the One-Eyed when they made an alliance with anwar Ibrahim. We know that anwar has his strategies planned by people who are not even here. The west knows too well that the best way to destroy the Malays is to let them fight one another. It boggles the mind on how a "religious" party can work hand-in-hand with a group of anti-Islam like DAP, a socialist party. Then again, how surprisaed can we get if we know the truth about pas? With a politician self-proclaiming himself as ulama, and every larry, curly and moe leaders of pas getting automatically referred to as "Ustaz", whether they know anything about religion or not, the Hadiths on the end of times becomes clearer and clearer. Under their guidance, and anwar's, it's not a wonder that we see Malays joining dap. How can we be surprised anymore to see Muslim Malays joining anwar's NED-planned riots such as Bersih, even though they know too well that the events were created with jewish-sponsorship, the same money that was used to ensure the persecution that we read above.

We can work with the people who persecute us? Seriously...

What will happen to the Muslim, especially Muslim Malays if dap rules? We have seen how Rohingyas, Muslims of Spain, Bosnians and Chams become targets for extinction because at one time in the past, they were with fighting against the powers that be of today. Maybe it's too hard to imagine, but I leave you with what dap war-cry were during the May 13th 1969 incident:

From ParpuKari:

Pada 11 Mei penyokong DAP berteriak:

"Apa polis boleh buat, kita raja. Buang sama polis Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang pada hari yang sama, DAP melaung:

"Mati Melayu, sakai pergi masuk hutan."

Di Jalan Changkat Dollah pula mereka mengapi-apikan bahawa:

"KL sekarang Cina punya."

Sehari kemudian pada 12 Mei di Jalan Ipoh dan Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman, penyokong DAP menjerit:

"Melayu balik kampung, Melayu sekarang tidak ada kuasa. Sekarang kita Cina sudah 'control'."

How many Muslims have we killed?

Malah sejarah mencatat kenyataan angkuh Kit Siang sendiri di Jalan Khir, Kampung Baru, di hadapan orang Melayu ini denga berkata:

"Melayu keluar! Apa lagi duduk sini, kita hentam lu, sekarang kita sudah ada kuasa."

Keesokan harinya pada 12 Mei di hadapan Balai Polis Jalan Pudu, penyokong Cina DAP terus melaungkan:

"...semua Melayu kasi habis, kasi halau semua polis."

"Apa ini Melayu, kita sudah perintah dia negeri, ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, mata-mata lancau."

Hari yang sama mereka juga mengutuk bangsa Melayu di Jalan Canvel:

"Butuh Melayu, Malai si, pergi mati Melayu."

Di Jalan Bukit Bintang, DAP pula berkata;

"Ini negeri bukan Melayu punya, kita mahu kasi halau semua Melayu."

Their intention, even if it's 43 years ago, are very clear on the Malays.

To create more misery, even Christian movements are moving in to divert Malays away from Islam. Being from a Syed family, we have been always been aware of this for a very long time as there had been an old warning that the Syeds' conversion from Islam will fetch a very high price for any church. Of course, I don't know much detail on that except for the fact that we were taught that the enemies of Islam have always been afraid and intimidated by the descendants of the Prophet Muhammad's family.


We have heard how Malay and Malay-looking priests were brought in from Singapore, Indonesia and the Phillipines for this purpose. The churches have special units now to gain more "Christian Malays Where is pas' stand on this? We know anwar supports acts of apostacy, and pas has always been ball-less on this issue. Dr Hassan Ali's expulsion from pas and his exco position for the raid on a church in Selangor is a big proof on that. As Islam in pas weakens (if there were any), and with pas' use of religion only to intimidate people into voting for them, do the Muslims in Malaysia stand a chance? Well, with pakatan getting more and more anti-Malaysia and anti-Islam in their stand, I guess the road is open wide.

I understand that some churches have begun using Allah in their sermons. So, which is it? Is Allah the father, son or the holy ghost? Or is He all three? Is the Holy Ghost the same as the Pengundi Hantu? How many do you worship? Can 3 be 1? I'm lost here...send me a priest, maybe we can do an exorcism.

Is the future of the Muslim Malays persecution? Will they be persecuted just because they are Muslims? With dap gaining advantage from anwar's NED strategy and pas' cowardice, looks like we are heading there. We do not know when the one-eyed, or the al-masikh will show himself, maybe he's here already, or maybe not, but his plans have been in place for a very long time. Muslim Malays are just a speck in his plans, but Muslims as a whole has always been a problem to him. It's a question of faith. We have read how poverty and misery caused Muslims to convert after being helped by agents of the church, or a "saviour". Remember that, when the one-eyed is about to appear, the world will be in such a misery where economic turmoil and a water-lacking world turned barren made people, Muslims or not, run in droves to embrace the al-masikh as a saviour.

Syawal is here. Let us rejoice for what we have, but spare a thought of what we will lose if we do not stop going at each other's throats. Think of what our children will never have once anwar sell us to his masters. Spare a thought to our brothers who are being persecuted. Give some time to ensure our children understand our faith well. Will our future generations be celebrating Eid-ul-Fitri, or Christmas? Will they be making pilgrimage to Mecca or the Holy Sepulchre? The one-eyed plan is still on-going, and we have yet to witness the emergence of the Mahdi.

Muslims must unite beyond politics.

As of that, I wish all Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Fitri, Maaf Zahir dan Batin. Bapak3 signing off. Wassalam

The Immoral Of The Story Is...

It was an amazing read. There were several opposition MPs who behaved so badly during the installation of the Yang Dipertuan Agong recently. How could that be? With all the foreign dignitaries, and I mean foreign, all prim and proper and on their most dignified during the event, how could we have fellow Malaysians, members of Parliament, acting like monkeys on crack?

For full articles on who the MPs were and how they behanved, click here, here and here

Malaysia is a country rich in culture and tradition, being made up of the major groups of Malays, Chinese, Indians and many other ethnic groups. None of these cultures have ever taught their respective groups to ever disrespect a leader, or an elderly, or in this case, the Head of the Country. Is this the beginning of of the end of Malaysians as we know them? However, I was told that, nobody was really surprised about it.

Pakatan has always been proud to be known as a proxy for certain movements that have been trying to mold the world into the shape that they want. The saying "money corrupts" should have been something they should be aware. When pakatan sold their souls to these foreign powers for fundings and consultancy, they inadvertently sold everything that they own.

Look at pas, for example, so afraid of being cut off from anwar's bottomless pockets, necame a pariah in the Malaysian politics where Islam was thrown out in favor of anwar's design of a so-called negara kebajikan, up to a point that they become so toothless to make any stand against anwar's pro-Israel statement. They even let their balls be cut off by anwar when he ousted the ulama faction from the party. Anwar knows that the ulama faction of pas has always been influential, and they stand in the way for anwar and his sponsors in their grands design for Malaysia.

With haji hadi having his guts wrenched by anwar, the latter ensures pas is ruled by anwar's equal: mat sapu. Mat sapu, scandaous and lacking in anything Islamic had his victory ensured by anwar and his cohorts. Now we have the vice president of pas, who usurped somebody's wife in the past, going around talking about how great the communists were...ironically, communists worked hard to extinct any religion from their countries, including Islam.

I can't say much about dap, as they have always been socialists...that's a spin-off from communism, but with money as religion. Morality? Well, when dap ruled Perak, they ensured that the Malays were sidelined when it comes to land distribution. When they fell off the pedestal, suddenly you can find dap leaders quoting the Qur'an to the Malays. PKR? Well, with anwar at the top of the party and chinadolls and at the back of somebody, I rest my case.

Anwar has always tried to be liberal in so many ways; he has adapted an American presidential style of campaigning, a western-lifestyle-inspired approach of politics, such as supporting Israel instead of Palestine, saying yes to apostacy and supporting Lesbians, Gays, Bi-sexuals (not surprising, ain't it?) & Trans-genders. Anything that the west promotes, anwar has embraced it. Whether it is because of his principles or pre-requisite for the foreign-fundings is anybody's guess.

Let us look at the morality of these foreign hands that hide behind pakatan. The caucasian jews have long been at work, reshaping the world. Was World War 2 and the killing of 60,000 jews or a bit more in Europe worth it? Yes, they got Jerusalem. Who says crime doesn't pay...for them, at least. Konrad Adenaeur Foundation (KAF), the International Republican Institute(IRI), National Endowment for Democracy(NED) and Open Society had their offices raided in Egypt and arrested. In United Arab Emirates, they were kicked out. The unrest in the Middle East were instigated by these groups. How high are their morals if they start bloodshed between Muslims, or even between the same ethnic groups? But that's what they're doing here. We have seen Muslims going against Muslims, and if this goes on, we'll just be South East Asia's very own Palestine.

For article on PKR and Konrad Adenauer Foundation, click here and here

The moral of these immoralities is, the incredibly bad behaviour of the opposition MPs during the installation shouldn't even be suprising to us. When they embrace the foreign NGOs agenda, their morality went out the window. Let's face it: how Malaysian and/or how Islamic are you if you embrace agendas set by people whose intentions are for the worst for Malaysians and the Muslims. Anyway, didn't we learen from hadiths that, during the end of days, there will be leaders who are both immoral and ignorant? I guess, their behaviour at the palace is a prelude to what's coming up next. We shouldn't even worry how bad their behaviour was, we have to worry more on what these people with bad behaviour have in store for Malaysia, on behalf of their western masters.

P.S.: They will only be on their best behaviour if people like Obama is in front of them, or Benjamin Netanyahu.

Support Bersih 3.0

The time has come; let's throw in our undivided support for the planned Bersih 3.0. Forget about from which jewish supremacy group the money is from, don't bring up the fact about NED and foreign NGOs who have painstakingly designed and strategized this event. Let's go and give our undying support. For that, I have completed a promotional video on why we should be there, at Dataran Merdeka on 28th of April 2012 for the event.



Bersih 3.0 - Leading Malaysia To A New Era Under....

A Friend of My Friend (Anwar) Is Our Friend...Or Do We See The Dark Of The Moon?

I have indeed missed a week or two of events in Malaysia due to my travels. Upon return and updating myself, a few reports caught my attention.

Pas' spiritual advisor was quoted as saying, that Islam does allow its followers to work together and/or have business relations as long as they have no bad or evil agenda behind it. (For complete article of this, please click here ) With certain rarity, I am bound to agree with this statement in general.

From the Holy Al-Qur'an, Hadith and history, we mostly distinguish the Jews as the Israelites, from the same Semitic line as the Arabs. By the time Muhammad S.A.W. began his mission in Mecca, there were several groups of "Arab Jews" in the Arabian Peninsular. Despite the majority being descendents of Israelites, there were a smattering of them comprising of Arabs who converted to Judaism before Islam. Most of these Arab Jews came to be there:

 * after the collapse of Kingdom of Judah in 586 BCE,
 * after the Roman conquest of Judea and the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 CE, exiles found a home in the desert,
 * being survivors of the Bar Kochba Revolt, in 135CE, who sought religious freedom in the Arabian desert rather than live under oppression by the Romans,
 * immigration, around 300 CE, by people who are known in Islamic literature as the Banu Aus and the Banu Khazraj who fled the Ghassanids in Syria.
 * migration from Judea into southern Arabian Peninsula to ride the ascent of the Himyarite Kingdom around 380 CE.

Other descendents of Israelites made their homes in other Arabic countries and even in north Africa. Their expulsions, again and again from Jerusalem or Bait-ul-Maqdis were the result of their arrogance and their intolerable attitude and disregard towards God and their blatant persecution of the Prophets appointed by God. This was made clear in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own);
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95)

There were conflicts before between the Jews of Mecca/Medina during Muhammad's prophethood. Bani Qaynuqa, for example, were expelled from Medina by Muhammad S.A.W. for breaking the treaty today known as The Constitution of Medina. Despite their early indifferent towards the Muslim world, for more than 1,000 years, Muslims have done business and even lived side-by-side with the Jews. In the past, we have even seen a few Jews involved in the administration or governance of Islamic countries in the Middle East and North Africa. When the Christians captured Jerusalem during the First Crusades in 1099, they went on a bloody rampage, where thousand of Muslims and Jews were massacred as the Christians have no idea how to distinguish between the two. The Jews who fled knew that as long as they stick with the Muslims, they will be safe.

With the collapse of Spanish Muslims Cordoba Caliphate , the Spaniards introduced the Spanish Inquisition in 1480 that saw thousands of Muslims and Jews in Spain tortured to death in order to force them to convert. Again, the Jews fled with the Muslims, mostlt to Turkey and other Islamic countries. Among the favorite methods used by the Inquisitors to detect the Muslims was serving pork at banquets as both Muslims and Jews are forbidden to eat them.

Today, these descendents of Israelites comprise only 20% or less of the population in the modern state of Israel. So, who are the biggest jewish population of Israel?

History notes a bizarre twist in the Israelites' fate and a decline in their fortunes. The Israelites' Kingdom in Jerusalem were destroyed by the combined forces of Babylonian and Scythian army under Nebuchadnezzar in 597BC. The Scythians did most of the destruction, leaving behind a completely destroyed nation, almost wiping its trace from the world.

The Scythians were a powerful group, originating from the northern part of the world, behind a great mountain range of the north, the Caucasus. They were very destructive in nature and caused a lot of death, misery and damage wherever they attack and pillage. Their only way in and out of their homeland is a pass between the two mountainous range. Manybiblical prophets wrote in their testaments of these people, one even referring them as "a boiling cauldron from the north." Scythians can trace their line back to Noah through Japeth or Yafet bin Noh.

Israelites were captured and brought to Babylon where the Israelites spent the next 57 years as slaves. When a just king, Dhul Qarnain (Dzulqarnain) conquered Babylon in 540BC, he proclaimed the freedom for Israelites whereby returning them to Jerusalem where they remained until they were expelled again by the Romans in 70CE.

The rampage and destruction brought on by the Scythians drummed fear into almost every civilization in the then-known world. Some Islamic scholars believe that it was the Georgians who met and implored help from the just king, Dhul Qarnain to stop these barbarians, despite not being part of his empire. The just king constructed a dam-like wall of iron and copper that cuts off the pass between the two range which disallowed the Scythians from going in or out to the then-known civilization.

They said, "O Dhul-Qarnayn, indeed Gog and Magog are [great] corrupters in the land. So may we assign for you an expenditure that you might make between us and them a barrier?" He said, "That in which my Lord has established me is better [than what you offer], but assist me with strength; I will make between you and them a dam. Bring me sheets of iron" - until, when he had leveled [them] between the two mountain walls, he said, "Blow [with bellows]," until when he had made it [like] fire, he said, "Bring me, that I may pour over it molten copper." So Gog and Magog were unable to pass over it, nor were they able [to effect] in it any penetration.

[Dhul-Qarnayn] said, "This is a mercy from my Lord; but when the promise of my Lord comes, He will make it level, and ever is the promise of my Lord true." And We will leave them that day surging over each other, and [then] the Horn will be blown, and We will assemble them in [one] assembly.
Surah Al-Kahfi 94-99

As time passes, the Scythians evolved and cultured themselves, officially embracing Judaism in the 8th century. Their kingdom was known as Khazaria. The attacks by the Russians drove the Khazars away into Europe where they blend in with the population, "surging over each other. Yes, I agree with some of the Islamic scholars that the iron and copper wall is no more. Is there any surprise that most white people are known as Caucasians? Despite the Jews flooding into eastern europe, the German Jews became quite dominant, especially the Ashkenazi Jews. Yiddish, which is a high german language of the German Jews, written in Hebrew alphabets became the almost official language of the non-Semitic European or Caucasian Jews.

The Caucasian jews replicated the Israelite jews so much, to a point of perfection, up to a point that they feel that they are Israelites and the land prmosed to Abraham's children is theirs, and theirs alone. The land stretches from the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. They were almost solely responsible for introducing usury-based systems in banking and insurance to Europe where it flourished. Migrations to the new world (USA) gave them more opportunities to control significant elements that will influence and shape the future, such as mass-media and the entertainment industry. The caucasian jews-controlled media manipulated the term Semitic to include them, and exclude the Arabs. Movie studios, controlled by these jews churned out movies which in the long run, plays into their favor, amplifying their manufactured wars on the plight of the Jews in Europe to gain sympathy. They loaned billions of dollars for US to fight the war, and in return, the British Mandate of Palestine fell into their hands.

Caucasian jews were already accumulating in areas surrounding Jerusalem in the late 19th century. Is it strange to see how jewish terrorists and all the jewish heroes of Israel in Palestine of the past were comprised of non-semitic jews? Moshe Dayan was a Ukrainian Jew, and none of the Prime Ministers of Israel are Israelites. Even the founder of Zionism is non-Semitic. The very organized Jewish Mafia of Israel comprise of non-semitic jews as well.

Let's understand a few basic elements here:
1) Not all Israelites are Jews, some have converted to other religion such as Islam and Christians throughout time
2) Not all jews are Israelites (semitic), the Caucasian (Russian/European) Jews are descended from Japhet Bin Noh.
3) Not all Caucasians are Jews
4) Not all Jews are Zionists; there are many Jews (both Semitic & Non-Semitic) who are against the killing of Palestinians and there are also Jews who feels that there SHOULDN'T even be a state of Israel.
5) Not all Zionists are Jews; many Christians are Zionists as well, such as Al Gore, Joe Biden and Madeleine Albright (despite her background of being Czech-jewish parentage, she is a Roman Catholic)
6) Lastly, a very well known but less spread information : Being an anti-jew is never anti-semitic. To be anti-semitic means that one has hatred and against the children of Sem bin Noh, namely 2 ethnics (brethrens): Arabs and Israelites

By a strange twist, or perhaps, irony, the tribe that destroyed the Kingdom of Israel and Judah became the saviour for the Israelite descendants. The Caucasian Jews brought the Israelites back to Jerusalem, fulfilling the prophecy stated in the Qur'an:

“But there is a ban on a town which We have destroyed: that they (the people of the town) shall not return (to reclaim that town as their own); until Gog and Magog are let through (their barrier), and they swiftly spread out in every direction (replicating themselves amongst all the peoples of the world).”
(Qur’an, al-Anbiyah, 21:95-96)

The requirements were completed. The Israelites were returned to Bait-ul-Maqdis by the already-blended Caucasian Jews who were freed from the iron-copper wall. The end of times are here, the countdown has been on even when Muhammad S.A.W. was appointed as the final Prophet by God. We are currently living in a Pax America world, but we can already smell the coming of Pax Judaica, a world run by the the children of Scythians for their one-eyed master, ruling from Jerusalem.

After all of these long walks into history, let's go back to nik aziz' statement. His statement seems to be double edged, and I am not absolutely sure who it is really meant to. If he was supporting Haji Hadi when the latter stated that it is okay to deal with Jews, it certainly is a selfish one, as pas usually is. I don't want to bring up the Israeli cricket team issue of the 1990s anymore as other blogs have dealt with it. However, I would like to see nik aziz stating this to anwar ibrahim over his choice of friends and allies. Why does anwar chose to ally with people like Paul Wofowitz, a Polish Jew, also a neo-con who master-minded the attack on Iraq? He is a strong supporter of the Zionists and associated with the think-tank known as Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). He is responsible for the attack on Iraq.

Another good friend of Anwar and pakatan is Madeleine Albright, a daughter of Czech-Jewish parents who converted to Roman Catholic when Hitler invaded the country. Long considered as a "close friend of Zionists", she was quoted on 60 Minutes, on 12 May 1996, in reference to genocidal sanctions against Iraq,

Questio: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

Madeleine Albright responded, "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it."

Anwar's other friends include Joe Esposito, Michael Camdessus and many more who are long associated with the close relationship to Zionists. Also included are his association with National Endowment for Democracy, Council for Foreign Relations, Accountability, Foundation for the Future and Open Society which receive funds from the same piggy bank that donates billions to the Zionists. These are not the zionists who has no evil agenda behind them.

Nik aziz and pas, along with the Muslims in pkr, must ask themselves, "Is the friend of my beloved leader is our friend?" Or has the moon darken itself in pas? Talk to anwar then, does pas really want to be another so-called Islamic party that is run by and bows down to Zionists? At least, if nik aziz stands his ground, he can finally carry out his responsibilities as a caring Muslim for once. Are anwar's allies the friends that we Malaysians need? Or should we understand more on what Surah Al-Rum is trying to tell us?

Nik aziz's statement is like a blanket too short, it covered Hadi, yet it uncovered anwar's butt, opening it to slaps and pokes.

Jawatankuasa Pemandu : Driving Kedah To Utter Confusion

Much has been said about this Jawatankuasa Pemandu which was suggested by phahrolrazi's zionist-loving pakatan group. It has always been anwar's dream to have any pakatan state obey and adhere to anything that he says and supports him in any wrong-doings. With this Jawatankuasa Pemandu, his dreams move a step closer with phahrolrazi as his dummy.

Pas' offcial schwarz-schtick, mahfuz was quoted in Sinar  as saying that the MB's power will not be usurped in any way. This is because the Jawatankuasa Pemandu is appointed to advice the leaders and not in the matters of administration...really. Seriously, can pas, next time, send somebody with an IQ of more than 25 to make statements? I could almost swear my cat committed suicide the moment mahfuz said that.

So, the Pemandu Committee does not usurp the MB's power? Let's see, contrary to mahfuz' statement, on March 5th Phahrolrazi was quoted as saying that (full article, click here )

“Yang paling penting matlamat kami tercapai iaitu inginkan perubahan dalam corak pentadbiran negeri, di mana kuasa bukan lagi dominan pada Menteri Besar dan mesyuarat Exco semata-mata. Kini, jika ada pandangan berbeza, boleh dirujuk pada jawatankuasa ini,”
(What is most important is that our objectives are achieved which is to see a change in the pattern of state administration, where power will not be dominated by the Menteri Besar and the Exco exclusively. Now, should there be any difference in opinion, it can be referred to this committee)

For a chap who claims to be a professional like phahrolrazi, ignorance and anwar must've blinded him. The constitution recognizes the Menteri Besar as the state leader, and his power over the running of the state administration is in his hands. Executive decisions are made by him and his exco. The majority in the exco over-rides the minority, and if phahrolrazi does not agree on something but the majority of the exco does, then know your role and shut your mouth. You are running a state and there's no time for you to run and cry to your mama just because other exco members do not support you.

Where will the Jawatankuasa Pemandu be placed in the constitution?

The Menteri Besar is appointed by The Sultan, usually the leader of a party which won the election, or somebody nominated by the respective winning parties. The Sultan, with advice from his council, will choose and endorse the suitable candidate.

The MB, in turn, appoints his exco, and there is no provision how many they are and what portfolio they hold. Exco members hold a term of 1 year of office. Little known fact is, the State Secretary and State Financial Officer from the State Civil Service are also part of the exco. It was also known that, during Dato Syed Nahar Shahabuddin's tenure as MB, the Pengarah Tanah & Galian was also an exco member to facilitate the many inquiries on land matters.

Unless it is by royal commission, or appointed by the MB, the Jawatankuasa Pemandu has no where to be placed in the state constitution.

Is the committee above the Sultan? Well, even pas members know well never to go there...unless they're contemplating suicide.

Is the committee above the MB? Only the Sultan is above the MB as he reports directly to the Sultan and take any advice from the Sultan without any buffers. Is the committee above the Exco? Exco is appointed by the MB and in no way, can have the committee in between.

So what if phahrolrazi and maybe one or two more do not agree with azizan? If 3 out of 10 disagree and the rest agree, what more do you want to say? You're out-voted. To have the committee referred to everytime one or two disagree with the MB will only lead to the state not having any progress at all...not that it has any in the first place.

So, how does phahrolrazi want to deny the powers stipulated by the state constitution? The committee will be political, not executive or administrative in any way whatsoever. So, what terms of reference will phahrolrazi bring if he tries to bring the committee into the picture? In fact, wouldn't it be downright rude and unworthy for anybody to usurp the power of the crown by placing themselves as the power to advice instead of the Sultan? Isn't it also unconstitutional to bring a group of people, elected or not, from this state or not, to interfere the running of the state? Kedahans will ask then who's running the state; the government they chose, or the sponsors who contributed to anwar's funds along with the massacre of palestinians?

How fair will the committee be? Even among pas' supporters, talks are rife that the Jawatankuasa Pemandu will be filled of anti-azizan members, hell-bent on ousting him from the seat. Plots have also been drawn to name azizan as the sacrificial lamb if pas loses Kedah in PRU-13. Even that doesn't really surprise me. In the hunt for power, and with anwar poking in from behind, do you think pas cares about Islam? That'll be the first thing that is thrown out the window.

Safe be said, Jawatankuasa Pemandu is unconstitutional, as stated by azizan. It has no place in the governance of the state nor does it have executive and administrative power. As many concluded, the committee is a ploy to sabotage the running of the state just because one or two key people who are pro-anwar LGBT pakatan disagree. Where is the democracy then?

Maybe phahrolrazi and his jewish-supporting pakatan cohorts should stop assuming that Kedahans are gullible and stupid. Never ever assume that, just because many Kedahans are from kampungs doesn't mean they have no idea what the constitution is all about?

For Kedahans, all of these events have the elements that mark the coming of change to Kedah. The demolitions, the destructions, the conspirings, the in-fightings and the hunger for power amongst pas leaders only serve as the catalyst to a countdown. Kedahans are ready for a change, and Gelombang Merah is coming with it.

Anwar Met Hamas? When Did Who Say What?

It all began with his statement to the Wall Street Journal:

"I support all efforts to protect the security of the state of Israel," said Mr. Anwar, although he stopped short of saying he would open diplomatic ties with the Jewish state, a step which he said remains contingent on Israel respecting the aspirations of Palestinians. Malaysia has consistently refrained from establishing diplomatic relations with Israel, although limited commercial ties exist between private companies in the two countries.
Full article here

From his statement above, it can be clearly seen that anwar is a proponent of the "two-state solution", which has been championed by the west, whereby 2 states will be recognized, Palestine and Israel.

Anwar was quoted as saying that he had explained to pas spiritual leader, n.ajis what he had explained to the leader of Hamas, Khaled Mashal during his meeting with Khaled and Sheikh Yusuf Qardhawi.


In short he stated that he met Khaled Mashaal and Khaled understood that Israel will only be recognized once all the contingents or pre-requisites are honored, or obeyed.

It should be a nice ending with anwar meeting the top leader of Hamas and Qardawi, we were even treated with nice pictures of anwar and the two leaders. In fact, all of these would be a very sweet ending to the whole "Anwar-pro-Israel" statement that he made to the Wall Street Journal.

Anwar posted on his blog, 2 pictures of him meeting Khaled Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusof Qardawi but kept mum on what were discussed. Other pro-anwar blogs followed suit with the pictures, but with no explanation. It's very strange that no media in Palestine and the world reported or mentioned this meeting in their newspapers, television, radio and/or their on-line publications. We spent hours searching the net for any news on the meeting itself and/or what they discussed about.

All searches on the net on anwar meeting Hamas leaders only return to anwar's blog. So, how come only anwar's blog claimed that he met Khaled Mashal without anydescription of what transpired? To say that all other medias in the world were on leave is highly speculative. When exactly did they meet?

We find it bizarre: when anwar stated his infamous remarks of supporting the security of Israel, it was reported on a global scale. The Islamic world views it as a sort of a death wish on anwar's part. Anwar should be pleased, after years of self proclaiming himself as a statesman, he finally got a reaction like one. The man stirred the Muslim world, and yet when he meets Hamas leaders, nobody bothers to report on the situation. In fact, no where can be found that Hamas met, discussed or even agreed with anwar's stand.

So, what did anwar claim he told n.ajis? Basically, what he claimed that a view shared by Hamas and himself: Anwar said he had explained that his stand on Israel is consistent with that of the Palestinian political factions Hamas and Fatah.

"I feel good as I could explain. In the end I said I follow the desires of Hamas and Fatah and what was negotiated among them in Doha two weeks ago," he said.


Anwar also, in the video above, quoted Ismail Haniyeh, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority representing Hamas:


“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognize them.”


Anwar also claims that the Hamas leader is clear on his stand and understands it.

We have searched media archives on the net looking for this, as we could not find this stand made by either Hamas, but we did find that the quote was made by Ismail Haniyeh in 2006, just days before becoming the Prime Minister, which was reported by The Washington Post. (An copy still available here)

However, a day later, Ismail Haniyeh made a statement that Washington Post misquoted him; that he never made any statement or has any intention of recognizing Israel. Full article here 

Alleviating anwar's problem, on 11th of February 2012, while in Iran, Ismail Haniyeh announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, full article here 

How could anwar claim that what he has explained is the stand that Hamas took, when Ismail Haniyeh himself refuted it? Whose stand did he share, Hamas or Washington Post? How come he used a refuted 6-year old interview as his basis?

Does N.ajis share his view on the "two state solution"? This report clears the air, here

So, anwar, when did who say what? His interview in the video above clearly shows his support for a two state solution, a stand that Hamas clearly condemn. Did anwar actually explain his stand to Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi? If he did, I'm surprised anwar got back to Malaysia fully intact. Here's part of a profile on Qardhawi:

Qaradawi similarly expressed his desire to see a "conquered" Jerusalem in a January 24, 2011, fatwa in which he negated Jewish attachment to Jerusalem and stated that it is the duty of Muslims to"defend" Jerusalem with "their lives, their money and all they possess, or else they will be subject to Allah's punishment."


This fatwa is part of Qardhawi's long record of inciting violence against Jews and Israel. During a sermon that aired on the Arabic satellite channel Al-Jazeera TV on January 28, 2009, Qaradawi told his audience, "I will shoot Allah's enemies, the Jews, and they will throw a bomb at me, and thus I will seal my life with martyrdom." In another sermon on January 9, 2009, Qaradawi lashed out at Jews, including calling on God to "kill them, down to the very last one."


He has also refused to dialogue with Jews. Qardawi declined to participate in the 8th annual conference organized by the Doha International Center for Interfaith Dialogue because of the participation of Jews.


In a statement released by Qaradawi's office, he reportedly said, "How can we conduct a dialogue in a time when they seize lands, shed blood, burn farms, and demolish houses? Palestine's conundrum has to be resolved first before we sit together at the same table."
(Reference taken from Dr. MIM, here)

Even anwar's attempt to have the contingents honored before giving recognition to the state of Israel contravenes the 1988 fatwa issued by 66 mufti that any action that gave recognition to Israel's existence is an act that opposes Islam, or does anwar really not bothered? Doesn't his action also swipe Sheikh Yusoff Qardhawi in his face?

Anwar claimed that his stand is in-line with Hamas and Fatah's stand when he met the groups in Doha two weeks earlier. The Hamas-Fatah Deal signed and endorsed in Doha has nothing about a "two-state solution" nor any mention or intention of recognizing Israel as a state. The Doha Agreement by Hamas and Fatah is a move to reconciliate both parties after years of conflict. (Read here) In fact, check out the Hamas Charter here. No where we can find anything on the terms and recognition.

For Hamas and Fatah to reach and seal the agreement in Doha, they would have to be unanimous in their stand and secisions. Any terms or attempts to recognize Israel as a state in a slightest way will end up with more hostility between the two groups. Do you think any of these 2 share the stand that anwar claim?

What was the point of accusing Malaysian media of twisting his statement on his support for Israel by deleting the word "contingent" when anwar himself twisted and used a misquoted statement made 6 years ago by Ismail Haniyeh to The Washington Post, and disguising it to make it look as if it is the stand stated by Hamas?

Despite all that anwar claimed, we understand that the Prime Minister of Palestine Authority, Ismail Haniyeh was outraged and saddened by anwar's support to Israel's security. How did we know that? Well, Ismail Haniyeh was told by YB Nasharuddin Mat Isa,when he met with Haniyeh in Kuwait. Nasharuddin was there as Pengerusi Pentadbiran Yayasan al-Quds Malaysia, a Malaysian foundation in aid of the Palestinian plight, chaired by YB Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir.

Let's simplify all of this chronologically, so that even Mahfuz can understand:

2006 - Ismail Haniyeh was quoted by Washington Post saying:

“If Israel withdraws to the ’67 borders, then we will establish a peace in stages... Number one, we will establish a situation of stability and calm which will bring safety for our people — what (Hamas founder) Sheikh (Ahmed) Yassin called a long-term hudna (truce). If Israel declares that it will give the Palestinian people a state and give them back all their rights, then we are ready to recognise them.”


2006 (a day later) - Ismail Haniyeh refuted the interview, saying that Washington Post misquoted him as he never made any statement saying that he will recognize Israel as a state.

26 January 2012 - Anwar made his famour remark on his support for Israel - and starts using the Washington Post misquoted article as the basis of his stand

Early February 2012 - Hamas and Fatah signs and endorses an agreement in Doha, reconciling after years of conflict. Agreement stipulates only ruling and administrative details with nothing pointing to any stages or intentions of recognizing Israel as a state whatsoever.

11 February 2012 - Anwar Ibrahim's blog released 2 pictures showing him meeting the Hamas Leader, Khalid Mashal and Sheikh Dr Yusoff Qardhawi. No details were given, and no other media in the world reported the meeting. Anwar's supporters mostly assume and claim that this is the meeting where anwar explained his stand, which is purportedly "in line" with the stand taken by Hamas on Israel.

11 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Iran, announced that Hamas will never recognize Israel, putting more holes into anwar's claims

14 February 2012 - Ismail Haniyeh and Hamas officials conveyed their shock and dismay to anwar's support for Israel through Nasharuddin Mat Isa, MP for Bachok. Message was conveyed to him in Kuwait.

21 February 2012 - Anwar met with nik aziz, and during interview, he reiterated his stand, quoting almost all the points based on the Washington Post misreporting. In fact, he used the misquoted Washington Post report to justify his stand.

Again, anwar, when did who say what? Why was it so difficult for you to retract the Israel support statement? I guess to be the one-eyed's bitch is better than being a group of displaced and oppressed people who are fighting with their lives for their freedom. Why? Hey, the one-eyed's organizations can one day make him a Prime Minister!

It seems that n.ajis distanced himself from anwar's statement, and yet pas remains in the totally misleading pakatan. According to anwar, the pas spiritual leader accepted his stand. One question arises: does anybody in pas ever make references and research over what anwar stated? If anybody has any reference that Hamas did actually make their stand as what anwar claim, please send me a link.

Looking at how the religious ones are abandoning pas, I wonder if n.ajis will be the solitary figure to demand retractions and apologies from anwar over the Israel remark? Or keep himself quiet in fear of reprisals from anwar followers in pas? 


Anwar might need to explain more, such as when was his meeting with the Hamas leader and maybe some clarification from them. In the meantime, can we send somebody to meet up with Hamas and/or Ismail Haniyeh and clarify anwar's story...or shall I say, work of fiction?

As The Sun Rises From The West, Anwar Rises With One-Eyed?

Perhaps it is true, Anwar must be the Anugerah Tuhan and Mahadi, all in one. He has the power to capture people's mind, and his strength is doubled with the strong support of 3 groups that Muslims have read in the Al-Qur'an and Hadiths:

1) The chosen tribe: Bani Israel, or the Israelites

2) The descendents of a destructive tribe who were at one time enclosed behind a wall between two mountain range. At the chosen time, the wall crumbled and these people came running down from high places. They try to pass themselves off as "The Thirteenth Tribe" of the lost tribes of Israel. In trying to make themselves more Semitic, the brought the tribe in No. 1 above back to a town which was destroyed at one time and forbidden to them. Today, with inter-breeding, Caucasians populate half of the world and controls the world. As the hadith says, only God can destroy these people.

3) At a few times, they were destroyed in apocalyptic punishments; then they were hush-hush about themselves, but now they are slowly gaining power and exerting their power. Yes, they are the perverted tribe who Lot was sent to.

Now who dares to go against somebody who has power endowed by these 3 groups? Even with anwar supporting the safety of Israel, nobody in pakatan dares to challenge it. Even the decrepit n.ajis found himself lacking in balls, at first showing off authority demanding anwar retract the statement, then stating that it is not pas' concern for the statement. Now that's a guy who has been a Menteri Besar of Kelantan for more than 2 decades, proclaim himself as ulama despite his many shortcomings, and tried to pass himself as such a holy man. Of course, if Umno backs Israel, we'll see massive demonstrations and riots, but because it's anwar, nothing goes.

Now why doesn't that surprise me? Seriously, this is the guy who stated that:

i) It is better to be friends with the devil than being with their Muslim brothers in UMNO

ii) It is okay to slander and use cursory foul language...as long as it is not directed at pas...

iii) Funds provided by enemies of Islam, such as for Bersih 2.0 to topple Muslim majority government is allowed because the ends justify its means...also, it enables pas to make money by being federal government officials.

Well, according to the dingbat known as mahfuz omar, n.ajis will be meeting with anwar today to discuss their stand on the Israel issue. Most probably anwar will use his claims that the Palestinian President is okay with it.

In what is labeled as a very unsurprising move, mahfuz has also claimed that the Israel issue is UMNO's fault and UMNO should apologize. Seriously, dude, I wouldn't blame pas kedah for calling mahfuz stupid, although I prefer the term "intellectually-impaired." Who said what? Who quotation was it in Wall Street Journal? Anwar has repeatedly in the past stated that he is for the establishment of two entities, Israel and Palestine existing together. By stating so, he recognizes Israel and the monstrosity that they do...now wouldn't that contravene the fatwa issued by ulamas of the Islamic world? Why does UMNO has to apologize? Mahfuz should be the one apologizing for his disappearing act during the 2010 floods in Kedah.

N.ajis might be too much of a gutless clod in the Anwar-Israel issue, but Malaysian Muslims seem to be more vocal. So far, we have seen how anwar claims that his car was attacked when he was at a ceramah in Mersing. As usual, he blames UMNO.


Somehow, noticing that this is anwar, along with his spin-master extraordinaire, Saifuddin Nasution, I would take that with a pinch of salt...well, maybe more. Pakatan has always made so much drama about being attacked, jeered and many others. The one eyed, via organizations such as NED taught pakatan very well. Acting, drama and manufactured reports can sell very well abroad. What are the examples? Let's see:

1) It was during Bersih 2.0 that anwar (as usual) claims that he was brutalized by some "thugs." It is strange that he spoke very well after that and before posing as a half dead sodomite, as sown below:

I have to say this again, I'm sorry, but it is always important that anwar must have his followers blinded in one eye, like him. In the same video, you can hear his supporters shouting the Takbir during Bersih 2.0, an event sponsored by a group whose funding also goes to the killing of Palestinians and creating unrest in Islamic countries, where thousands of Muslims are slain.

Accordin to the good doctor who treated anwar's back, anwar is still in pain and should not do any sudden and straining movement...really?

Of course, his back also seems extraordinarily fine with a chinadoll around.

2) Everybody knows Tiang Chua as the loyal bitch...well, maybe better labeled as "Right Hand Man", which better than being at the receiving rear end. One can see his his acting clearly in this video, despite tiang chua's cowardly hesitation. He charges, although always looking back, towards the police, and once the police takes defensive action, commanded his people to snap pictures, then selling to western media as "police brutality."



It is interesting to see that, judging from his cowardly turn arounds, we feel that if he turns around and sees nobody charging with him, he might just flee. He has always been popular with provocation, such as biting and bashing the police. Still, what goes around, comes around. At a ceramah in Gadek, a very frightened tiang chua had to actually ask help from the Police against a hostile reception.


Well, that's what he gets for his racist days.

Anwar will be explaining...or in the process of explaining his stand for Israel to the Majlis Syura Pas today. He will be explaining why he stands firm on it and the consequences that will befall on pas if they don't follow what he says.

What does anwar possess to create so much fear in his his pakatan? Is it his ability to make people vanish? Or is it something to do with his pockets?

Is the one-eyed's favorite pet really rising? He has, after all, qualified and passed through all the western requirements with flying colors. He has supported Israel, got himself sponsors from the west and even made alliances with LGBT? So, when will they make him PM? But is that all enough to make anwar the PM? Is he required to do more? We wouldn't be surprised anymore.

One day, the "sun" will rise from the west...actually, it is in the process right now. So far, poerful nations such as China and Rusia is making it difficult to happen. But the day will come where either both countries will be vanquished physically or certain "regime changes" will happen that make both countries submit to the west.

What's happening in Malaysia has only revealed a more sickening scenario: the cancerous anwar is getting more and more desperate for the west to instigate the "regime change" for him as his popularity plummets down the IWK sewage pipe. In his heart, he might just be shouting that he has supported all the groups that Islam has singled out to be dangerous deviants and perverts, why isn't he a Prime Minister yet? But even support and money coming from jewish-sponsored organizations cannot guarantee anwar will ever be a good leader. Is he that good? Why then did all close friends chose to leave PKR while anwar was busy selecting his family and close friends to become leaders?

The question is also asked on whether Malaysians can see him for what he really is through BOTH eyes and not one eyed like himself and his organization's true boss? There are evidences that Malaysians are finally seeing the truth about anwar, but time will tell.

I'll leave this article with a good video on the rise of the brave and couragous Muslims towards anwar in Gadek.


and on Anwar, this:

Vanishings - For The Sake of PKR's Mahdi?

So now we know where he has been. Well, we know where he was in when he was working for dap's elly wong, it's the question where he disappeared to after the scandal of elly wong's less-than-desired photos exploded.

As we have all noticed, since 2008 that pakatan keeps "disappearing" their people, especially those with troubles in pkr. We do have ideas of why but only the malevolent anwar knows why he wants them away.

Looking back at the case few years ago, when the exposure of the pictures of the exposed elly came about, many ask who could do such a thing...and how she could let him. Well, we don't really care anymore about elly and helmi having a knick-knack paddywhack, give a dog a boner part. Anwar, in strict principle of the one-eyed strategy blamed UMNO. Seriously, who gains from the issue? And for goodness sake, please tell mahfuz that Britney Spears looks nothing like elly wong!!!

Looking deeper...no, not into elly wong's hair-raising pictures, looking deeper into the issue, how would the scandal benefit BN? They have no majority still even if elly resigns. There was an issue of elly wong supporting the complaint against mosques using loud-speakers but even that is too trivial. However, I did notice that elly has always been vocal about the racist dap's stand in selangor. She issued the typical threat of dap pulling out of pakatan if the lkatter refuses to adhere to dap's whims and design, i.e. the mega pig farm for selangor.

The explosive nature of the scandal seem to neutralize her fangs as she became less vocal about everything. What, is it "message received"? Anwar was the one who refused to let her resign, and even that was a strong yet strange questionionable move. Is that another message saying "Now you do what we want or worse things will happen?" Even pas, the pakatan's office boys" were instructed to support her despite committing...well, naughty things with hilmi. Well, at least her strength in facing that gave her the legendary title of Zina The Warrior Princess.

So, who actually benefitted from the scandal? UMNO gained nothing but the blame while the actual perpetrating party reaps its benefit. They are well organized definitely.

PKR is no stranger in making people disappear. So, who else has disappeared so far?

The former Bukit Selambau PKR assemblyman, V. Arumugam, was made to disappear when strong indications hinted that he will join Barisan. He was "vanished" to Mumbai and has since returned.

The private investigator who made 2 statutory declarations, one accusuing and the latter, retracting, P. Balasubramaniam. He was believed to be sent to a neighbouring country and later, London as well. Ah yes, jolly old London, where else.

The PUSRAWI general practitioner, Dr Osman Abdul Hamid, whose modified report was used partially to show that he did not commit sodomy, which sounded nice in fiction.

They all went missing at one time. India, Thailand and God-knows-where have been their selected destination, they disappear overnight, just like that, before authorities have any chance of taking action on whatever they did. Almost all of them claim that, despite Anwar and the one-eyed dominated pakatan gaining from it, "being threatened by government agents." I do recognize that method: it was all scripted, and only one guy can direct such a production...and he's off searching for more money from his friends and his jewish-sponsored groups.

The questions that many ask have been consistent: how could they afford to disappear away to foreign countries at a snap of a finger? It's not cheap, those involved are not that rich, but they seem to be able to bring them and their families there at ease. Where did they get funding for that? Or were they funded? In Hilmi's case, the Indonedian police revealed that he was staying in Indonesia at the expense of an opposition party...ooo...the mystery thickens...well, not so, we already know which opposition party has a bottonmless pocket, pouring in from their "friends" with one eye.

In elly wong's case, she didn't disappear, but the pkr boy toy did. That's that, it's good to be there. Get married, have fun with wife, have fun with boss and get sent to live in Indonesia...more fun there, and of all places, Batam...Singapore's favorite vice den.

Looking at the disappearaces, and the alleged murder over illegal sand mining in Selangor, I have to agree with Selangor Bangkit bloggers that pakatan is nothing more than an organized crime. Send people in create damages, get them out to safe houses. If you are about to lose your own people, "vanish" them at keep them at bay until such time when the coast is clear. Of course, this all depends on the Godfather's wishes, such as where to send them, let them live or not, will it be a beauty boy or a china-doll tonight and such.

Maybe I shouldn't write too deeply on this matter, I might just "disappear,"