The One Eyed's Smaller Grand Design: Anwar, Soros, Open Society and The Currency Crisis 1997

The 1997 Currency/Economic Crisis of Malaysia was a worrying one. I remembered the time very well. I was with my first job in a big corporation, and they were in trouble: their shares went down to paper value, they couldn't take loans from banks to finance their projects because of the huge interest rates the Finance Minister of the time, Anwar Ibrahim imposed, they couldn't service the monthly interest charges for the loan they took as the interest was very high (again); things look gloomy. The company paid us by the skin of their teeth. Later, when anwar was kicked out and the currewncy peg was introduced with the interest lowered, the company managed to get through one of the most difficult periods of the time. That company is still around today, despite changing its name and it is still listed on the 2nd Board of KLSE.

For many who read between the lines have found the crisis to be too bizarre. There were some Chinese businessmen friendsof mine were saying that somebody is playing with their money a year before. Tun Mahathir, who defied the world and the "God-like" IMF, took an alternative because he recognizes the manipulation designed to crash the Malaysian economy. George Soros was finally exposed as the culprit behind the scheme.

George Sorosis no stranger to Malaysians...and to many Asian nations that he destroyed. Born as Schwartz Gyorgy in 1939, this Hungarian Jew rose to prominence through his business of currency trading and speculation.

Below is an interesting article that spells out the details of Soros' manipulative activities during the Asian Currency Crisis and who his "chosen one" is. This article is taken from George Soros NWO Dossier (full article) and also at AIDC

The Case of Malaysia

by Alexandra Perebikovsky

Technically, Malaysia gained its independence from the British Empire in 1957. Since then however, the British intention has been to continue using the nation as its very own playground for its free trade chaos and looting operations. In 1997 Lyndon LaRouche stated, “free trade, practiced against the nations of Southeast Asia, is simply a new form of colonialism, whose fruit is mass murder. In that sense, there is no difference, in effect on people, between free trade and Nazism.”

Up until the mid 90’s currency crisis, Malaysia was a staunch follower of globalization, albeit taking significant steps toward development in the years following their independence. Since the British deployment of George Soros into Southeast Asia to loot the currencies of these nations, Malaysia has changed its view. In the mid-1990’s, Lyndon LaRouche forecast that the so-called “Tigers” of Southeast Asia,1 after years of globalization, hot money flows, and destructive speculative activity would suffer the same fate as Mexico after 1995—utter collapse. Indeed, in the months leading up to July 1997, Soros worked tirelessly to carry out London’s currency warfare, with the intent to collapse the Southeast Asian economies. The Tiger

economies had succumbed to the flood of hot money in the 1990s, which created bubble economies based on inflated stock values and financial services. The government “guarantees” on foreign investments, imposed by the western speculators, ultimately bankrupted the Southeast Asian national economies.

Soros financed a large portion of this hot money. He began his attack on the Thai and Malaysian currencies in February of 1997 “with a zeal I haven’t seen since the successful assault on several European currencies around three years ago” according to one analyst. 2 Through speculation in futures markets, Soros’ Quantum Fund leveraged $1.2 trillion. He took short positions against the Thai baht, the Philippine peso, the Indonesian rupiah, and the Malaysian ringgit, sending these currencies falling by 40-70%, collapsing stock markets, and wiping out currency reserves. The breaking point was in July of 1997 when the Thai baht was forced to float, with greater than 20% devaluation, after the government had unsuccessfully spent over $15 billion trying to defend the currency. The IMF austerity conditions imposed on these nations following the collapse drove their economies back 15-20 years in their potential for development and their standard of living.

On September 20, 1997, Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohammed stood before the IMF and defiantly spoke out against the looting policies of the British Empire: “We in Malaysia laughed at the suggestion that our country would follow the fate of Mexico. . . . But now we know better. We know why it was suggested that Malaysia would go the way of Mexico. We know now that even as Mexico’s economic crash was manipulated and made to crash, the economies of other developing countries, too, can be suddenly manipulated and forced to bow to the great fund managers who have now come to be the people to decide who should prosper and who shouldn’t.”

Prior to the attack on the Southeast Asian markets, Mahathir had been an outspoken follower of globalization. However, following the British Empire’s organized takedown of the Malaysian economy, the fantasy of “free trade” was broken. Reflecting the proposals of economist Lyndon LaRouche, Dr. Mahathir launched his own attack against speculator George Soros, calling him a “moron.” EIR’s special report “The true story of Soros the Golem; A profile of mega speculator George Soros,” circulated widely in Malaysia’s leading circles. London, surprised by Mahathir’s sudden backlash, unleashed a string of slanders, including an article published in the Asian Wall Street Journal on September 19, 1997, titled: “Malaysia’s Mahathir Finds Strange Source for Soros Campaign; Asian Country’s Media Tap U.S. Conspiracy theorist Lyndon LaRouche, Jr.”

In an attempt to destroy any influence or connection Malaysia had to LaRouche, London deployed Soros once more to clean up the mess. Soros was given a chance to defend himself against Prime Minister Mahathir’s accusations and attempted to deny the charges—he was not successful:

Ted Koppel: “You’re talking here about the Malaysian Prime Minister.”

George Soros: “That’s right.”’

Ted Koppel: “And he, I mean his charge is that you, in effect, systematically set out to destroy Malaysia’s currency.”

George Soros: “And that is absolute nonsense. Now, you know, what more can I say? It’s just absolutely no foundation at all.”

Ted Koppel: “Because—I mean put it in easily understandable terms. I mean if you could have profited by destroying Malaysia’s currency, would you have shrunk from that?”

George Soros: “Not necessarily, because that would have been an unintended consequence of my action. And it’s not my job as a participant to calculate the consequences. This is what a market is. That’s the nature of a market. So I’m a participant in the market.”

Ted Koppel: “Apolitical, amoral?”

George Soros: “That’s exactly right.”

The Backlash

In September 1998, Dr. Mahathir shocked the world by declaring sovereign currency controls on the Malaysian ringgit, pegging their currency to a fixed exchange rate against the dollar, and thereby effectively ending the speculators ability to loot the country through currency speculation.Soros, and the entire western financial oligarchy, went berserk, claiming that Dr. Mahathir’s actions against IMF orthodoxy would bring damnation down upon his country. In fact, as was later obvious to all, his defense of the nation’s sovereignty saved the population from the devastation suffered by every other nation that had been subjected to Soros’ butcher knife.

Following Malaysia’s break with globalization, London launched an even nastier operation to create an internal crisis in Malaysia. Anwar Ibrahim was the deputy prime minister and chosen heir to Mahathir; he became the target to carry out the Empire’s brutal operation.

Sponsored by Soros and his one eyed master

Anwar was later kicked out of his post as deputy prime minister because he “lacked the moral standards required” to lead the nation. Financed by Soros and his cronies through the Open Society Foundation, Anwar proceeded to launch a campaign to bring down the government of Malaysia. He portrayed himself as a freedom fighter and champion of free market society, denouncing the new government’s protectionist economic policies and accused them of carrying out a conspiracy to destroy him. Meanwhile, Soros’ Human Rights and Open Society organizations played their part in labeling Mahathir as the “last of the old-line Asian authoritarians” and showed Anwar as the “reformer” trying to free the people of Malaysia. The western media, including the Wall Street Journal, continued to fuel the turmoil in Malaysia, saying: “The sacking Wednesday night of Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim signaled the end of a battle for the soul of an important nation. . . . At home and abroad, Mr. Anwar had come to symbolize the democratic aspirations and open-mindedness of a new generation, more at ease in the world and less burdened with the pain of old sleights and frustrations than the man he was expected to succeed.”

Gee...I wonder why he's so buddy-buddy with anwar?

Even Soros buddy, Al Gore, threw his weight behind the speculators.5 On November 13, 1998, President Clinton had been invited to speak at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum, hosted by Malaysia. Due to the severity of the Iraq crisis, Clinton was forced to stay back and dispatched Al Gore in his place. The resulting catastrophe occurred on November 16 when Gore delivered a speech to the APEC business advisory council where he called for “short term” recovery by allowing “free markets to work their magic” and, though not naming him, endorsed Anwar Ibrahim over Mahathir to lead the nation. Sprinkling salt in the wound, Gore echoed Anwar’s cries for a new government: “People will accept sacrifice in a democracy, not only because they have had a role in choosing it, but because they rightly believe they are likely to benefit from it. . . . The message this year from Indonesia is unmistakable: People are willing to take responsibility for their future—if they have the power to determine that future. . . .Democracy confers a stamp of legitimacy that reforms must have in order to be effective. And so, among nations suffering economic crises, we continue to hear calls for democracy and reform in many languages—‘people’s power,’ ‘doi moi,’ ‘reformasi.’ We hear them today—right here, right now—among the brave people of Malaysia.” With the Malaysian government incensed and the Malaysian people riled up, Gore promptly left the venue. A few days later, then foreign minister Abdullah Badawi, sent the US a heated letter of protest, warning that the United States would be held accountable for inciting instability.

Malaysia Today

The escapades of Soros, Gore, and other London cronies in Malaysia can only be seen in one light—the British Empire’s continued aims at destabilization in Southeast Asia. Today, Abdullah Badawi has taken over the post of prime minister and Anwar, with one hand permanently glued to Soros’ gluttonous money bags, is still running operations aimed at destabilizing the government, including his intended buy-off of parliamentarians in the opposition party, the United Malays Political Organization. The fate of Malaysia remains to be seen. However, in the context of the current global financial collapse, its future lies in the implementation of Lyndon H. LaRouche’s four powers agreement and in the destruction of the British Empire and its crony, George Soros.

More On Malaysia Today

Malaysia saw drastic changes when the nation-destructing Pak Lah was indirectly ousted from his position and Datuk Seri Najib Tazak took over. However, Najib has a major task to perform. The odious anwar and his sponsors have caused a lot of mischief in Malaysia. Seeds of disunity was sown through politics of hatred and distrust. How strong are the funds by Soros and his organizations? Pas became dap and pkr's errant boy, ditching Islam and the ulama faction out of their party, replacing the ulamas with entertainers whose 10 cents worth of religious knowledge is being used on stage to get people to vote for them. By spreading the funds on targeted people, you have blank headed youths stomping pictures of leaders and showing their buttocks off in public...strangely they are more embarassed when they were arrested compared to when they showed private parts to public.

Soros' funds have been targeted for destabilization of the Malaysian government and at the same time, profit from it. When do they reap the profits? I guess when the Opposition Leader becomes the Prime Minister then. The destabilization movement by pakatan has been going on for the past few years. Riots, chaos, dramatizations and many more have been played so well to feed the western media so that they can sell to the world a picture of an oppressed Malaysia.

Through all of these, we recognize that anwar ibrahim, pakatan and acts of terrorism go hand in hand. So, is it a surprise when even anwar's bodyguard threatened protesters with a gun. Strange, isn't it that anwar's paid rioters can run riot and cause chaos, beat up people who do not support them and claim that it is freedom of expression and yet his bodyguard threaten public with a gun when anwar's bus was blocked by people who disagree with him. Well, I guess the west really have their perfect product: a dictator for another Asian country. anwar is their perfect Nimrod. Of course, at this point, pas and many Muslim supporters have become jokes in the Muslim world: Open Society has been funding pakatan via anwar with the same wad of cash that's also being used to create death and destruction in Palestine, Libya, Egypt and many other Muslim countries, and yet Muslim Malays in pakatan have been have been shouting Allahu Akbar during programs paid for by the same organization.

Maybe for the Malay Muslims of pakatan, it's a simple solution: hey, the one eyed is going to control the world one day, and the jews and gog and magog will be in control as well, and even the hadith says that no man can defeat gog and magog except for God, so, why not just accept the fact and surrender to them now? I don't know, they seem not to think about anything in the first place.

What happened in 1997 is a Grand Design of the one-eyed on a very small scale, and what we see today is slightly larger. Whether they succeed or not depends on whether Malaysians are deceived by pakatan or not.