After All The One Eyed's And West' Aid, Why Is Anwar Still The Opposition?

It must be said here that, the Holy Al-Al Qur’an and Hadith have forewarned the Muslims of the days to come. The messages may be cryptic and deciphering them on the whole might require more knowledge than human have now. We can be assured that some theories have been advanced and the world looks in a different way. The wall built to seal off the group of people who “causes mischief on earth" have long crumbled. Those people have already inter-bred with the people mainly in the west, where the sun is rising from now. The one-eyed, at one point of hidden history has met them and collaborated with each other, but each of them keeps a suspicious at each other as both parties want to dominate the world.

With the creation of the illegal secular state of Israel after World War 2, concentrations were given in keeping the security of the state. With US, UK and other European countries keeping an eye on the security, the "people from behind the mountains" that now rules Israel can run the world as it sees fit, by proxy.

The hadith on the end of times chronology stated about these people where God commanded to Jesus to bring his followers to a mountain for shelter from these attacking people, stating that no man can destroy them but God. It can be derived that these people, who originally were cunning barbarians that were feared by almost all civilizations, and were blocked from the world by "He of Two Horns", have now evolved into a civilized, disciplined and intellectual bunch of murderers who will not be defeated until the right time. They have always been smart: in the past, knowing that they could not withstand the might of the Muslim army, they devised an ideological war, which led to in-fighting amongst Muslims.

The west today, still learns and studies any movements, organizations and even countries they decide as a "threat" to their survival. We have seen in the past how "regime changes" came about as "the unbound voice of democracy arises." Somewhere along the line, there's always the west poking their fingers in that particular mess. During the Cold War, the west via CIA tried to assassinate Fidel Castro by so many ways but failed, but they managed to execute President Salvador Allende of Chile, a popularly elected leader who is also a Marxist. Their proxy was General Augusto Pinochet, who was given support and sponsorship to launch a coup de tat against Allende's government. The army under Pinochet "suicided" Allende. This was all done to protect US business interest in Chile, and for this, the country suffered the next 25 years under the brutal regime of Augosto Pinochet, US' proxy.

Even the clergy-powered, hardcore Shiite Iran was not spared. President George W Bush (yes, the hollow drunk) approved more than US100 dollar to NGOs in Iran to support the opposition parties against President Ahmadinejad during the 2009 elections. Sure enough, the Iranian opposition suddenly became grand with riots exploding everywhere, but with the clergies in the driving seat and Ahmadinejad's victory, along with the Iranian parliament calling for the executions for the 2 opposition leaders who have been inciting the riots with sponsored cash, the riots died down. Bush failed in his attempt to overthrow the Iranian government. Bush faced impeachment, where among the listed crimes was Article 21of the Kucinich/Wexler impeachment articles: "the president misled Congress and the American people about threats from Iran, and supported terrorist organizations within Iran, with the goal of overthrowing the Iranian government."

Even the Popular Uprising in the Middle East is not excluded from their prying hands. The two greatest events that took place which captured the global community were the Tunisian Revolution that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (Zainal Abidin Bin Ali) of Tunisia and the Egyptian Uprising that finally ousted Hosni Mubarak. The political scenarios were already ripe for revolutions as both leaders of the country had been staunch US allies and supporters, while the majority of the people were not. In Tunisia, the suicide of 26 year old Mohamad Bouazizi by burning himself because his livelihood was confiscated by authorities became the starting point of the revolution. In Egypt, the murder of Khaled Mohamed Saeed by Egypt's secret police culminated into the downfall of President Hosni Mubarak. Basic human rights and fair elections also became the rallying cry in their uprising. Economic conditions were added to these in Libya and Syria.

The uprising took a strange turn in Egypt when Muslims and Coptics (The Egyptian Orthodox Christians) starting clashing over religious intolerance. This is one of the most bizarre points as the Muslims, for hundreds of years, have always respected the Coptics.

It is true that it was the conditions in each country by its respective leaders that led to the uprising, somewhere along the way, the west played their cards as well. Scores of sponsored NGOs and agents have been in those countries, such as National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Young Republicans and many more. For decades they have been seeding unrest by advocating western ideology, or maybe just pretending as humanitarian aid. Their tasks are not military, but more oratory and media-related. With the murder/suicide triggering their cue, hatred and hostility can easily be spread by tongue and received by the angry hearts of the people of the nation. With Mubarak and Ben Ali out, it goes to show that US never even bothered to help the very people they groomed and goes to show further that anybody chosen by the west is expendable.

The current Syrian unrest begs more question than ever. Over time, I have read how many Syrian soldiers and public left the army to join FSA (Free Syrian Army), and how smugglers had a hard job of supplying arms to them.. Their weapons are usually brand new and they are not from the Syrian army depot. Who is the actual group or individual sponsoring the weapons? What is more frightening is that the weapons seem to be more advanced compared to the army.

Will the new leaders of the countries be able to steer their people away from the turmoil? History denotes that each of those countries will face decades of unrest, or at least an uneasy peace. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq, despite the west placing their designed leader there, the fighting continues...just like what the west wanted. I wouldn't cheer for the new Islamist President of Egypt, Mohammed Mossi yet as I will need to read between the lines of whose alliance he is on and which direction he is taking.

These are the basic list of what they fought for in the Popular Uprising:
1) Basic human rights
2) Clean and fair elections
3) Economy

The west has indeed found the best and ultimate way to exercise regime change in countries they deem necessary, without military or any visible hand of theirs, by using the people of the nation. The days of sending snipers and sponsoring disgruntled generals of the army of that particular country may soon be over. What can be cleaner than instigating riots and violence that will oust the leader than by turning the citizens into puppets for their own play? We have seen how they butchered Gaddafi. Still, there are questions that remain unanswered:
a) How come people like Marcos and Ben Ali, among some, can never be extradited to their countries of origin?
b) Is it sheer coincidence that US-sponsored leaders like Hosni Mubarak and Soeharto were suddenly hit by stroke right after they were deposed?
c) How come leaders, who used to be US-allied, like Saddam Hussin were hastily tried and executed. Even the trial became more like a show to the world.

Never give the west an inch, or they'll take over your land. History taught us that, but it seems that even in Malaysia, after hundreds of years under colonization, anwar and pakatan seem to be opening up more space than needed in their lust for power.

In a true template to the west' design, anwar played the same card...although with different results. Along with dap, pkr and the dope among all, pas, they went around sowing seeds of disunity. Mind you, these "seeds of disunity" are the points that the west consider good enough to topple a country if exposed and strategically attacked.

The racial disunity card was played well by anwar and his pakatan. Institutions that help Malays and Bumiputras were condemned as corrupt and self-serving. They even attacked the New Economic Program as "a corrupt program that enriches only politicians."

Religious insensitivity was introduced by pakatan, spearheaded by DAP. Lim guan eng and the dyspeptic kapal sink were loud in making their anti-Islamic stand, followed suit by Bar Council. Worse, ambiga promoted the Inter-Faith Commission and along with pakatan, threw their weight in for the apostasy of Lina Joy.

Polis Diraja Malaysia received much of the brunt of the attack by pakatan. Painted as brutal, corrupt and government's dogs, pakatan even staged several dramas where they provoke police by attacking them, and once the police retaliate, they start taking pictures to be sold to the world. Unfortunately for anwar, he went to the same well one too many times. His stage plays have been recorded during the bersih riots. This is the usual effort to attack any country's public defense. I wonder why anwar never mentioned about the US police and National Guard bashing Occupy demonstrators in Minnesota a month or so ago.

 In another effort to further weaken the defenses of the nation, anwar attacked the army as well (click here for article) by claiming that the army is the hand that ensures Barisan's winning by ordering that all ballot papers must have Barisan Nasional checked beforehand. He also claimed that the army will always be ready to take over the country should ever Barisan lose the general election. This is necessary to create distrust between the public and the army and even among the army themselves. We should always remember, the police and the army played pivotal roles in securing the nation during the May 13th Riots.

Pakatan rakyat has been claiming of how bad the economy in Malaysia has been, with most GLCs facing disaster, i.e. Felda going bankrupt and that sort. But they were left with their mouth open and their cheeks slapped tight when Felda announced huge windfalls for Felda settlers. Even the settlers who have been severely critical of Felda had to force themselves to be unabashed to collect their cheques, while pakatan got bashed. Their red faces of embarrassment glowed so bright that one could swear that it was Chinese New Year.


Anwar and pakatan, along with ambiga and bar council staged the bersih rallies, sponsored by NED via George Soros. By strategic planning of the NGO, and paid spectators, bersih became the ugliest event in the country, causing millions of RM in damages. This move did confuse many, even in the west. With pakatan winning 5 states in the 2008 General Elections, why is anwar claiming that the election was dirty and corrupt? If BN keeps winning all the time with more than 90% majority (like in the case of Ben Ali), it would've been a different question altogether. On the other hand, the bersih rally was a blessing to Malaysians: they get to see how pakatan degraded themselves to be terrorists and became pawns of the west. In return, the final bersih rally threw dirt into anwar and pakatan's face when they had to deal with so much anger from the public. I must say that, despite getting Malaysians to be angry, anwar and pakatan got them on the wrong side of the scale.

Let's see now, anwar and his pakatan rakyat have followed the recipe given by the west and spent the sponsorship freely, but what went wrong? Why are they still the opposition? Why isn't anwar the President of the Republic of Malaysia yet? Didn't the west studied Malaysia's fragile points already and taught anwar properly on how to strategically destroy them? In fact, Malaysia has always been a strong opposition to Israel and has always been vocal about it, shouldn't the west want that threat neutralized?

Maybe anwar should wonder to himself, is the west serious in their attempts to place him as the leader of this nation? Have they forsaken him because he spoke against Israel on the Freedom Flotilla issue? Or because he keeps mucking up by having more and more of his tight secrets being revealed by his once-loyal-supporters and Ummi Hafilda? The latest revelation on his a few billions of RM in his accounts is making him more popular in the wrong way. His support for Israel's security, while it puts a smile on the west, made him enemies of the Muslims and his reputation with Hamas is questionable...although it has always been questionable in the first place. The lack of attendants to his ceramahs is beginning to show how much liability he is to pakatan and to the west. With more videos slated to be released on anwar's slam-bang-thank you-ma'am by his once loyal close aides, the west might have to rethink of their strategies.

History has shown how the west chose less-than-clean individuals to be the replacement leader of certain nations, as they always need skeletons in the closet for controlling factorbut it is not supposed to be that obvious. Even anwar's face demonstrates the diminishing luster and aura. Is the west dumping him? Even if they do, the damage has been done, and it will take time to repair them. Pas might have to look deep into their hearts; their reputation (if any) has been annihilated by their participation with anwar in pakatan. The mega-pig farm, Madrasah Salihiah waqf land, pubs and nite-clubs in Kedah, their support for Lina Joy's apostasy, their non-action on the use of "Allah" by other religions, their shameful act of turning Unit Amal into terrorists and their ever loyal support for a man who supports Israel and supported by Jews despite their so-called Islamic stand, these have so much eroded Muslims' trust in pas. Having anwar, pkr and dap turning their backs on the Muslims and Malays is a grave injury, but with pas joining them to do the same made it fatal.


I don't think the west really cares what happens to anwar after this; the Neo-cons have lost their power base under Obama. To the jews, Malaysia is not located anywhere on the land which they claim is God's promise to Abraham: from the banks of the Nile to the banks of Euphrates. To the one eyed, anwar is just a speck of dust of one wannabe leader whose worth is 5 sen a dozen.

While the Muslims and Malays fight one another in Malaysia, guess who's laughing at the dap hq. Oh yes, by the way, with all of the Muslim countries fighting amongst themselves, including us, guess who's laughing in the conquered land of Bayt-ul Maqdis?